Courtroom illustration of EEOC suing The New York Times for alleged race and sex discrimination in a 2025 promotion decision involving a white male employee.
Courtroom illustration of EEOC suing The New York Times for alleged race and sex discrimination in a 2025 promotion decision involving a white male employee.
Bilde generert av AI

EEOC sues The New York Times over 2025 promotion decision, alleging race and sex discrimination

Bilde generert av AI
Faktasjekket

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed a lawsuit Tuesday in federal court in Manhattan alleging that The New York Times passed over a white male employee for a deputy real estate editor role in early 2025 because of his race and/or sex, citing the company’s diversity goals as a motivating factor.

The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and alleges violations of federal employment discrimination law.

According to the EEOC, the employee—an editor at the Times—had experience with real estate journalism but was not advanced to the final round of panel interviews. The agency alleges that the four candidates who did advance were all not white men.

The EEOC says the Times ultimately selected an outside candidate for the deputy real estate editor position, describing the hire as a multiracial woman and alleging she had little or no experience in real estate journalism. The complaint also cites internal evaluation and interview notes, including an interviewer’s characterization of the successful candidate as “a bit green overall,” according to reporting on the filing.

The lawsuit further alleges that the makeup of the final interview pool consisted of a white woman, a Black man, an Asian woman, and a multiracial woman.

The Times rejected the allegations. In a statement reported by multiple outlets, company spokesperson Danielle Rhoades Ha said the decision was merit-based and that the EEOC’s case was politically motivated, adding that race and gender did not play a role and that the company would defend itself in court.

Hva folk sier

Initial reactions on X include conservative accounts highlighting alleged DEI bias against the white male employee, neutral reports from outlets like WSJ and OANN summarizing the EEOC claims and NYT's denial, and skeptical opinions questioning the employee's long-term position or the rarity of such EEOC suits. Discussions focus on the promotion process details, diversity goals as a factor, and potential settlement outcomes, with posts from journalists, news accounts, and users showing varied sentiments.

Relaterte artikler

Illustration of Planned Parenthood Illinois executives signing $500K EEOC settlement over DEI-related racial discrimination claims.
Bilde generert av AI

Planned Parenthood of Illinois settles EEOC case over DEI practices

Rapportert av AI Bilde generert av AI

Planned Parenthood of Illinois has agreed to pay $500,000 to resolve an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission investigation into discrimination claims linked to its diversity, equity and inclusion efforts. The EEOC found the affiliate violated federal civil rights laws by segregating employees by race and harassing white staff. The settlement follows charges from multiple employees.

A federal judge in Florida dismissed President Trump's $10 billion defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch over a story linking him to Jeffrey Epstein. U.S. District Judge Darrin P. Gayles ruled that Trump failed to adequately allege actual malice, but allowed an amended complaint. The decision came Monday following a July lawsuit prompted by the newspaper's report on a 2003 letter.

Rapportert av AI Faktasjekket

A federal judge in Boston granted a preliminary injunction Friday blocking the Trump administration from enforcing a new requirement that public universities submit detailed admissions data to show they are not considering race, after a lawsuit brought by 17 Democratic state attorneys general.

Ed Martin, serving as U.S. pardon attorney in the Trump administration, has been accused of ethical violations for threatening sanctions against Georgetown University Law Center over its diversity programs. The D.C. Bar's disciplinary counsel also alleges he improperly pressured judges to interfere with an investigation into his conduct. These claims stem from a complaint by a retired California judge.

Rapportert av AI Faktasjekket

Two San Francisco taxpayers and a civil-rights group have sued the city over an ordinance that created a Reparations Fund intended to support programs for Black residents. The plaintiffs argue that administering a fund tied to race and ancestry violates equal-protection guarantees under the U.S. and California constitutions.

Dette nettstedet bruker informasjonskapsler

Vi bruker informasjonskapsler for analyse for å forbedre nettstedet vårt. Les vår personvernerklæring for mer informasjon.
Avvis