Illustration of a federal appeals court gavel blocking Trump's border 'invasion' proclamation, with asylum seekers at an opening U.S.-Mexico border gate.
Illustration of a federal appeals court gavel blocking Trump's border 'invasion' proclamation, with asylum seekers at an opening U.S.-Mexico border gate.
AI 生成的图像

Appeals court blocks Trump’s ‘invasion’ border proclamation, clearing path to resume asylum processing

AI 生成的图像
事实核查

A federal appeals court on Friday ruled that President Donald Trump’s proclamation describing migration at the U.S.-Mexico border as an “invasion” and using that finding to suspend access to asylum exceeds the authority Congress granted in immigration law. The decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit could require the government to restart at-the-border asylum processing, though the administration has indicated it plans to seek further review.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said the Immigration and Nationality Act gives noncitizens the right to apply for asylum when they are physically present in the United States, including at the border, and does not allow the president to replace Congress’s framework with “procedures of his own making.”

The ruling stems from a proclamation Trump issued on Jan. 20, 2025—Inauguration Day—declaring conditions at the southern border an “invasion” and directing authorities to suspend migrants’ ability to seek asylum until he determines the invasion has ended.

In a brief statement carried by The Daily Wire, the outlet said the Trump administration is expected to appeal, which could delay changes on the ground.

Separate government releases and analyses have reported that unlawful border crossings and Border Patrol apprehensions fell sharply after Trump returned to office in January 2025. A July 2025 Homeland Security Department announcement, for example, said Border Patrol logged 8,039 apprehensions nationwide in a recent reporting period, describing it as a record low.

The court’s decision addresses the legality of using the “invasion” proclamation to suspend asylum access, not whether the government can pursue other enforcement measures under existing statutes.

人们在说什么

Reactions on X to the D.C. Circuit ruling blocking Trump's 'invasion' proclamation and asylum suspension are polarized. Trump supporters decry activist judges undermining border security efforts. Critics of the policy praise the court for upholding asylum rights and congressional authority. Legal experts note the decision's focus on statutory limits and likely Supreme Court appeal.

相关文章

Illustration of Spanish Supreme Court ruling on immigrant regularization, showing judges in courtroom with immigrants and officials.
AI 生成的图像

Supreme court rejects suspension of immigrant regularization

由 AI 报道 AI 生成的图像

Spain's Supreme Court on Friday rejected a request to suspend the extraordinary regularization process for immigrants. The ruling came after a hearing involving the Madrid regional government, Vox and other groups.

Five months after the Trump administration paused immigration processing from high-risk countries following a deadly D.C. shooting, the policy—now covering 39 nations—has stranded thousands already in the U.S. in legal limbo, facing job losses, stalled careers, and deportation fears. Personal stories highlight hardship, while lawsuits yield court orders for relief.

由 AI 报道

The Department of Justice failed to secure a stay of a lower court order blocking its policy requiring advance notice for visits to immigration detention facilities. The unanimous ruling from the D.C. Circuit came on Friday after judges found the government had not demonstrated sufficient harm from unannounced congressional oversight. U.S. Circuit Judge Neomi Rao, in a concurring opinion, agreed that the administration fell short despite her view that the government is likely to prevail on appeal.

此网站使用 cookie

我们使用 cookie 进行分析以改进我们的网站。阅读我们的 隐私政策 以获取更多信息。
拒绝