Judge dismisses X's lawsuit against advertisers over boycott

A US District Judge has dismissed with prejudice X's antitrust lawsuit claiming advertisers colluded to boycott the platform. Judge Jane Boyle ruled that X failed to show consumer harm required for an antitrust claim. The decision comes after advertisers pulled ads citing concerns over content moderation on X.

On Thursday, US District Judge Jane J. Boyle of the Northern District of Texas dismissed X Corp.'s lawsuit against major advertisers, ruling that their decision to pause advertising did not violate antitrust laws. X, formerly Twitter, had accused members of the World Federation of Advertisers' Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM) of conspiring to boycott the platform following Elon Musk's acquisition and changes to content moderation policies in 2022. Named defendants included companies such as Shell, Nestlé, Colgate, Mars, Twitch, and Lego, who cited brand safety concerns amid reports of increased hate speech on the site under lighter moderation rules. Advertisers formed GARM to enforce collective standards for ad placements, gaining leverage over platforms by threatening coordinated action if standards were not met. Musk received warnings from GARM after taking over Twitter, leading to a meeting, but the boycott persisted, slashing X's revenue by up to 59% in early 2023, as reported by The New York Times. In her opinion, Boyle wrote, “The very nature of the alleged conspiracy does not state an antitrust claim, and the Court therefore has no qualm dismissing with prejudice.” She emphasized that antitrust injury requires harm to consumers, not just competitors, and noted X's claims—that reduced revenue hindered platform improvements—fell short. Boyle also criticized X's early push for broad discovery as a “fishing expedition,” focusing on general GARM involvement rather than boycott specifics. Advertisers maintained their decisions were independent, based on individual brand safety assessments. The ruling, which bars refiling, may impact X's separate lawsuit against Media Matters, though Musk has not commented. GARM was suspended in 2024 amid related litigation.

Relaterede artikler

Courtroom scene depicting X appealing a €120 million EU Digital Services Act fine, with lawyers, judges, and symbolic elements.
Billede genereret af AI

X appeals EU €120 million ($140 million) Digital Services Act fine

Rapporteret af AI Billede genereret af AI Faktatjekket

X said it has appealed a €120 million ($140 million) fine imposed by the European Commission for breaches of transparency obligations under the EU’s Digital Services Act, in what could become a first major court test of the bloc’s new online-platform rulebook.

Elon Musk's X has invoked a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision to argue that music publishers' copyright infringement claims against it should be dismissed. The platform contends the ruling rejects the theory of contributory liability alleged in the suit. Publishers disagree but agreed to pause discovery while briefing the issue.

Rapporteret af AI

Elon Musk's xAI lost its bid for a preliminary injunction to block California's Assembly Bill 2013, which requires AI firms to disclose training data details. US District Judge Jesus Bernal ruled that xAI failed to demonstrate the law reveals trade secrets or causes irreparable harm. The company must now comply with the law, effective since January, while the lawsuit proceeds.

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal by Texas citizen journalist Priscilla Villarreal, leaving in place a divided ruling that she cannot sue local officials over her 2017 arrest for obtaining nonpublic information from police. Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued a lone dissent, calling the arrest an obvious First Amendment violation.

Rapporteret af AI

A federal judge in Manhattan has ruled that customers accusing Binance of selling unregistered tokens can pursue their claims in court rather than through arbitration. The decision rejects the cryptocurrency exchange's attempt to enforce arbitration for these disputes. Binance, the world's largest crypto platform, faces ongoing legal challenges over alleged illegal sales.

The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission has expressed concerns about Netflix's proposed $83 billion acquisition of Warner Bros., citing potential issues in the streaming market. However, the FCC lacks authority to review the deal. Regulators including the Justice Department and FTC are examining it for antitrust implications.

Rapporteret af AI

Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos will appear before a Senate committee next month to address antitrust concerns over the streamer's $83 billion acquisition of Warner Bros.' studios and streaming business. Warner Bros. Discovery's chief strategy officer Bruce Campbell will also testify at the February hearing. The session comes amid opposition from lawmakers and industry groups worried about market concentration and job losses.

 

 

 

Dette websted bruger cookies

Vi bruger cookies til analyse for at forbedre vores side. Læs vores privatlivspolitik for mere information.
Afvis