Judge dismisses X's lawsuit against advertisers over boycott

A US District Judge has dismissed with prejudice X's antitrust lawsuit claiming advertisers colluded to boycott the platform. Judge Jane Boyle ruled that X failed to show consumer harm required for an antitrust claim. The decision comes after advertisers pulled ads citing concerns over content moderation on X.

On Thursday, US District Judge Jane J. Boyle of the Northern District of Texas dismissed X Corp.'s lawsuit against major advertisers, ruling that their decision to pause advertising did not violate antitrust laws. X, formerly Twitter, had accused members of the World Federation of Advertisers' Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM) of conspiring to boycott the platform following Elon Musk's acquisition and changes to content moderation policies in 2022. Named defendants included companies such as Shell, Nestlé, Colgate, Mars, Twitch, and Lego, who cited brand safety concerns amid reports of increased hate speech on the site under lighter moderation rules. Advertisers formed GARM to enforce collective standards for ad placements, gaining leverage over platforms by threatening coordinated action if standards were not met. Musk received warnings from GARM after taking over Twitter, leading to a meeting, but the boycott persisted, slashing X's revenue by up to 59% in early 2023, as reported by The New York Times. In her opinion, Boyle wrote, “The very nature of the alleged conspiracy does not state an antitrust claim, and the Court therefore has no qualm dismissing with prejudice.” She emphasized that antitrust injury requires harm to consumers, not just competitors, and noted X's claims—that reduced revenue hindered platform improvements—fell short. Boyle also criticized X's early push for broad discovery as a “fishing expedition,” focusing on general GARM involvement rather than boycott specifics. Advertisers maintained their decisions were independent, based on individual brand safety assessments. The ruling, which bars refiling, may impact X's separate lawsuit against Media Matters, though Musk has not commented. GARM was suspended in 2024 amid related litigation.

Verwandte Artikel

News illustration depicting FTC officials in settlement talks with major ad agency executives amid antitrust probe on ad placements steered from X platform.
Bild generiert von KI

Report: FTC in talks with major ad agencies amid probe into alleged coordination over ad placement decisions

Von KI berichtet Bild generiert von KI Fakten geprüft

The Federal Trade Commission is in discussions with several of the world’s largest advertising agencies—including WPP, Publicis Groupe, Dentsu, Havas and Horizon Media—about a possible settlement tied to an antitrust inquiry into whether ad dollars were steered away from certain online platforms, including Elon Musk’s X, for political or ideological reasons, according to The Wall Street Journal as summarized by The Daily Wire.

Elon Musk's X has invoked a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision to argue that music publishers' copyright infringement claims against it should be dismissed. The platform contends the ruling rejects the theory of contributory liability alleged in the suit. Publishers disagree but agreed to pause discovery while briefing the issue.

Von KI berichtet

A federal judge in Sacramento temporarily halted Nexstar Media Group's operation of Tegna stations following the company's $6.2 billion acquisition, approved by regulators last month. The move came amid antitrust lawsuits from eight states and DirecTV, alleging the deal violates competition laws. Chief Judge Troy Nunley heard arguments last week and plans to rule soon.

Writer Beatriz Gutiérrez Müller publicly questioned Elon Musk after receiving an X notification about temporary reduced visibility on her account due to 'unusual activity'. She ironized in her post about the notice, suggesting it targets accounts inconvenient to political interests. The platform states the measure resolves in days or weeks if rules are followed.

Von KI berichtet

A US federal judge has dismissed with prejudice Musi's lawsuit against Apple, ruling that Apple could delist the free music streaming app with or without cause. The judge also sanctioned Musi's lawyers for making up facts in their claims. The decision upholds Apple's removal of the app from its App Store in September 2024.

A federal judge in California has permitted a class-action lawsuit against Tesla to move forward, alleging the company favors foreign workers on H-1B visas over U.S. citizens. The suit, filed by software engineer Scott Taub, claims systematic hiring preferences and disproportionate layoffs of American workers. The ruling advances the case to discovery, though some claims were dismissed.

Von KI berichtet

In a follow-up to its landmark Cox decision, the US Supreme Court has vacated a lower court ruling holding internet service provider Grande Communications liable for subscribers' copyright infringement and remanded it for reconsideration. The order, issued Monday, reinforces that ISPs face contributory liability only if they intend infringement, potentially benefiting other providers like Verizon.

 

 

 

Diese Website verwendet Cookies

Wir verwenden Cookies für Analysen, um unsere Website zu verbessern. Lesen Sie unsere Datenschutzrichtlinie für weitere Informationen.
Ablehnen