Judge dismisses X's lawsuit against advertisers over boycott

A US District Judge has dismissed with prejudice X's antitrust lawsuit claiming advertisers colluded to boycott the platform. Judge Jane Boyle ruled that X failed to show consumer harm required for an antitrust claim. The decision comes after advertisers pulled ads citing concerns over content moderation on X.

On Thursday, US District Judge Jane J. Boyle of the Northern District of Texas dismissed X Corp.'s lawsuit against major advertisers, ruling that their decision to pause advertising did not violate antitrust laws. X, formerly Twitter, had accused members of the World Federation of Advertisers' Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM) of conspiring to boycott the platform following Elon Musk's acquisition and changes to content moderation policies in 2022. Named defendants included companies such as Shell, Nestlé, Colgate, Mars, Twitch, and Lego, who cited brand safety concerns amid reports of increased hate speech on the site under lighter moderation rules. Advertisers formed GARM to enforce collective standards for ad placements, gaining leverage over platforms by threatening coordinated action if standards were not met. Musk received warnings from GARM after taking over Twitter, leading to a meeting, but the boycott persisted, slashing X's revenue by up to 59% in early 2023, as reported by The New York Times. In her opinion, Boyle wrote, “The very nature of the alleged conspiracy does not state an antitrust claim, and the Court therefore has no qualm dismissing with prejudice.” She emphasized that antitrust injury requires harm to consumers, not just competitors, and noted X's claims—that reduced revenue hindered platform improvements—fell short. Boyle also criticized X's early push for broad discovery as a “fishing expedition,” focusing on general GARM involvement rather than boycott specifics. Advertisers maintained their decisions were independent, based on individual brand safety assessments. The ruling, which bars refiling, may impact X's separate lawsuit against Media Matters, though Musk has not commented. GARM was suspended in 2024 amid related litigation.

Verwandte Artikel

Courtroom scene depicting X appealing a €120 million EU Digital Services Act fine, with lawyers, judges, and symbolic elements.
Bild generiert von KI

X appeals EU €120 million ($140 million) Digital Services Act fine

Von KI berichtet Bild generiert von KI Fakten geprüft

X said it has appealed a €120 million ($140 million) fine imposed by the European Commission for breaches of transparency obligations under the EU’s Digital Services Act, in what could become a first major court test of the bloc’s new online-platform rulebook.

Das Unternehmen X von Elon Musk hat sich auf eine aktuelle Entscheidung des U.S. Supreme Court berufen, um eine Abweisung der Urheberrechtsklagen von Musikverlagen gegen die Plattform zu erreichen. X macht geltend, dass das Urteil die in der Klage angeführte Theorie der mittelbaren Haftung (contributory liability) zurückweise. Die Verlage widersprechen dieser Ansicht, stimmten jedoch einer Aussetzung des Beweisaufnahmeverfahrens zu, während die Rechtsfrage schriftlich erörtert wird.

Von KI berichtet

Elon Musk's xAI lost its bid for a preliminary injunction to block California's Assembly Bill 2013, which requires AI firms to disclose training data details. US District Judge Jesus Bernal ruled that xAI failed to demonstrate the law reveals trade secrets or causes irreparable harm. The company must now comply with the law, effective since January, while the lawsuit proceeds.

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal by Texas citizen journalist Priscilla Villarreal, leaving in place a divided ruling that she cannot sue local officials over her 2017 arrest for obtaining nonpublic information from police. Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued a lone dissent, calling the arrest an obvious First Amendment violation.

Von KI berichtet

A federal judge in Manhattan has ruled that customers accusing Binance of selling unregistered tokens can pursue their claims in court rather than through arbitration. The decision rejects the cryptocurrency exchange's attempt to enforce arbitration for these disputes. Binance, the world's largest crypto platform, faces ongoing legal challenges over alleged illegal sales.

Der Vorsitzende der Federal Communications Commission hat Bedenken hinsichtlich des von Netflix vorgeschlagenen 83-Milliarden-Dollar-Übernahmes von Warner Bros. geäußert und mögliche Probleme im Streaming-Markt genannt. Die FCC hat jedoch keine Befugnis, den Deal zu prüfen. Aufsichtsbehörden wie das Justizministerium und die FTC untersuchen ihn auf Kartellrechtsverstöße.

Von KI berichtet

Netflix-Mit-Geschäftsführer Ted Sarandos wird nächsten Monat vor einem Senatsausschuss erscheinen, um Kartellbedenken bezüglich des 83-Milliarden-Dollar-Übernahmes der Studios und des Streaming-Geschäfts von Warner Bros. durch den Streamer zu klären. Warner Bros. Discovery-Strategiechef Bruce Campbell wird ebenfalls bei der Februarhörung aussagen. Die Sitzung findet inmitten von Opposition von Gesetzgebern und Branchengruppen statt, die sich um Marktkonzentration und Arbeitsplatzverluste sorgen.

 

 

 

Diese Website verwendet Cookies

Wir verwenden Cookies für Analysen, um unsere Website zu verbessern. Lesen Sie unsere Datenschutzrichtlinie für weitere Informationen.
Ablehnen