Sen. Bernie Moreno announces Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025 at press conference, with U.S. flag and symbolic dual citizenship imagery.
Sen. Bernie Moreno announces Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025 at press conference, with U.S. flag and symbolic dual citizenship imagery.
Billede genereret af AI

Republican senator introduces bill to end dual U.S. dual citizenship

Billede genereret af AI
Faktatjekket

A bill introduced by Ohio Republican Senator Bernie Moreno would require many Americans with dual citizenship to choose between their U.S. nationality and another. The Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025 is framed by its supporters as enforcing exclusive loyalty to the United States, while critics warn it would create a tiered system of citizenship and face serious constitutional challenges.

On December 1, 2025, Senator Bernie Moreno, a Republican from Ohio, introduced the Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025 in the U.S. Senate, according to his office and multiple news reports.

The legislation targets U.S. citizens who also hold another nationality, generally requiring them to choose between retaining their American citizenship or the other. Under the bill, existing dual nationals would have one year after the law takes effect to renounce their foreign citizenship or relinquish U.S. citizenship; failure to do either would result in the person being treated as having voluntarily given up U.S. nationality under Section 349(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, according to summaries from Moreno’s office and legal analyses.

Moreno, who was born in Colombia and became a naturalized U.S. citizen at age 18, has said that being American should involve exclusive allegiance. In a statement released by his office and quoted widely in regional and national outlets, he said: “One of the greatest honors of my life was when I became an American citizen at 18, the first opportunity I could do so. It was an honor to pledge an Oath of Allegiance to the United States of America and ONLY to the United States of America! Being an American citizen is an honor and a privilege—and if you want to be an American, it’s all or nothing. It’s time to end dual citizenship for good.”

The bill is part of a broader Republican push to tighten the terms of citizenship and eligibility in public life. In recent months, Republicans in Congress have advanced measures such as the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, which would require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in federal elections, and some GOP lawmakers and allied groups have renewed calls to narrow birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment—though those efforts have not changed current law and would likely face constitutional challenges.

Legal experts note that Moreno’s proposal would collide with long-standing Supreme Court precedent. In cases such as Afroyim v. Rusk and Vance v. Terrazas, the Court held that Congress cannot strip citizenship without a citizen’s voluntary and intentional renunciation. Because the Exclusive Citizenship Act would deem people to have relinquished U.S. citizenship if they fail to act within a set period, analysts say it is likely to be tested in court if it advances.

Critics argue the measure would, in practice, create tiers of citizenship by forcing millions of dual nationals to choose between their legal rights and family, cultural or economic ties abroad. Advocacy organizations such as Voto Latino have condemned the bill as an attack on American multiculturalism, saying it would force Americans to choose between their citizenship and their identities. Some scholars also warn that tying citizenship more closely to exclusive national allegiance echoes approaches seen in more authoritarian systems.

Supporters of the bill, including Moreno and some conservative commentators, counter that it is intended to ensure “sole and exclusive allegiance” to the United States and to avoid potential conflicts of interest involving dual nationals. The legislation would direct the State Department and the Department of Homeland Security to create procedures to verify exclusive citizenship status and update federal records.

Birthright citizenship—rooted in the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause and reaffirmed by Supreme Court precedent—remains a central feature of U.S. law. While hard‑line immigration critics continue to press for changes through legislation or executive action, any effort to curtail it, like Moreno’s proposal to end dual citizenship, would face steep legal and political hurdles. For now, the Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025 stands as a symbolic marker of intensifying debates over loyalty, identity and what constitutes full American citizenship.

Hvad folk siger

Reactions on X to Sen. Bernie Moreno's Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025 are polarized. Supporters, including conservative influencers, hail it as a necessary measure for undivided U.S. loyalty and America First policy. Critics, from immigrants' rights groups to dual citizens, call it unconstitutional, discriminatory, and a threat to millions, potentially affecting figures like Melania Trump. High-engagement posts highlight both enthusiasm and backlash, with skepticism about its passage.

Relaterede artikler

U.S. Supreme Court justices hearing oral arguments on birthright citizenship challenge in Trump v. Barbara.
Billede genereret af AI

Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in Birthright Citizenship Challenge

Rapporteret af AI Billede genereret af AI

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments on March 30, 2026, in Trump v. Barbara, challenging President Trump's executive order limiting birthright citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants or those on temporary visas. As previously covered, the order—issued January 20, 2025—interprets the 14th Amendment as not granting automatic citizenship in these cases. A ruling, expected in coming months, could impact hundreds of thousands of children born after February 20, 2025.

Republicans in the US Senate plan to vote this week on the SAVE America Act, a bill pushed by President Trump requiring proof of citizenship for voter registration. The measure aims to prevent noncitizen voting, described as rare by experts, but could disenfranchise millions lacking documents. Its passage faces hurdles due to the filibuster.

Rapporteret af AI

The SAVE America Act, which mandates proof of citizenship for voter registration and ID at polls, passed the House but faces resistance in the Republican-led Senate. President Trump urged its passage in his State of the Union address, yet Majority Leader John Thune has expressed caution over procedural strategies amid ongoing Department of Homeland Security funding issues. Democrats strongly oppose the bill, warning it could disenfranchise millions of voters.

The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments on April 1, 2026, in Trump v. Barbara, challenging President Donald Trump’s executive order limiting birthright citizenship. Trump attended the hearing in person—the first sitting president to do so—before leaving midway and posting criticism on Truth Social. A majority of justices expressed skepticism toward the administration’s arguments.

Rapporteret af AI

Senate Majority Leader John Thune indicated that advancing the SAVE Act, which requires proof of citizenship for voter registration, faces significant procedural hurdles despite pressure from President Donald Trump. Much of the push for the bill comes from online influencers rather than within the Senate. Internal GOP disputes and other legislative priorities add to the uncertainty.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune announced that Republicans plan to revise the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act to mandate photo identification for federal elections. The change aims to address gaps in current election laws by requiring ID at polling places. The original bill, which passed the House in April 2025, focused on proof of citizenship during registration.

Rapporteret af AI Faktatjekket

Sen. Bill Hagerty said on Fox News that Democrats’ resistance to the Republican-backed SAVE America Act is tied to illegal immigration, arguing that voter ID and citizenship checks are broadly popular. Sen. Susan Collins said she supports the House-passed bill but only if Republicans do not try to weaken or eliminate the Senate filibuster—leaving the measure with a steep 60-vote hurdle.

 

 

 

Dette websted bruger cookies

Vi bruger cookies til analyse for at forbedre vores side. Læs vores privatlivspolitik for mere information.
Afvis