Sen. Bernie Moreno announces Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025 at press conference, with U.S. flag and symbolic dual citizenship imagery.
AI 生成的图像

Republican senator introduces bill to end dual U.S. dual citizenship

AI 生成的图像
事实核查

A bill introduced by Ohio Republican Senator Bernie Moreno would require many Americans with dual citizenship to choose between their U.S. nationality and another. The Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025 is framed by its supporters as enforcing exclusive loyalty to the United States, while critics warn it would create a tiered system of citizenship and face serious constitutional challenges.

On December 1, 2025, Senator Bernie Moreno, a Republican from Ohio, introduced the Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025 in the U.S. Senate, according to his office and multiple news reports.

The legislation targets U.S. citizens who also hold another nationality, generally requiring them to choose between retaining their American citizenship or the other. Under the bill, existing dual nationals would have one year after the law takes effect to renounce their foreign citizenship or relinquish U.S. citizenship; failure to do either would result in the person being treated as having voluntarily given up U.S. nationality under Section 349(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, according to summaries from Moreno’s office and legal analyses.

Moreno, who was born in Colombia and became a naturalized U.S. citizen at age 18, has said that being American should involve exclusive allegiance. In a statement released by his office and quoted widely in regional and national outlets, he said: “One of the greatest honors of my life was when I became an American citizen at 18, the first opportunity I could do so. It was an honor to pledge an Oath of Allegiance to the United States of America and ONLY to the United States of America! Being an American citizen is an honor and a privilege—and if you want to be an American, it’s all or nothing. It’s time to end dual citizenship for good.”

The bill is part of a broader Republican push to tighten the terms of citizenship and eligibility in public life. In recent months, Republicans in Congress have advanced measures such as the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, which would require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in federal elections, and some GOP lawmakers and allied groups have renewed calls to narrow birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment—though those efforts have not changed current law and would likely face constitutional challenges.

Legal experts note that Moreno’s proposal would collide with long-standing Supreme Court precedent. In cases such as Afroyim v. Rusk and Vance v. Terrazas, the Court held that Congress cannot strip citizenship without a citizen’s voluntary and intentional renunciation. Because the Exclusive Citizenship Act would deem people to have relinquished U.S. citizenship if they fail to act within a set period, analysts say it is likely to be tested in court if it advances.

Critics argue the measure would, in practice, create tiers of citizenship by forcing millions of dual nationals to choose between their legal rights and family, cultural or economic ties abroad. Advocacy organizations such as Voto Latino have condemned the bill as an attack on American multiculturalism, saying it would force Americans to choose between their citizenship and their identities. Some scholars also warn that tying citizenship more closely to exclusive national allegiance echoes approaches seen in more authoritarian systems.

Supporters of the bill, including Moreno and some conservative commentators, counter that it is intended to ensure “sole and exclusive allegiance” to the United States and to avoid potential conflicts of interest involving dual nationals. The legislation would direct the State Department and the Department of Homeland Security to create procedures to verify exclusive citizenship status and update federal records.

Birthright citizenship—rooted in the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause and reaffirmed by Supreme Court precedent—remains a central feature of U.S. law. While hard‑line immigration critics continue to press for changes through legislation or executive action, any effort to curtail it, like Moreno’s proposal to end dual citizenship, would face steep legal and political hurdles. For now, the Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025 stands as a symbolic marker of intensifying debates over loyalty, identity and what constitutes full American citizenship.

人们在说什么

Reactions on X to Sen. Bernie Moreno's Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025 are polarized. Supporters, including conservative influencers, hail it as a necessary measure for undivided U.S. loyalty and America First policy. Critics, from immigrants' rights groups to dual citizens, call it unconstitutional, discriminatory, and a threat to millions, potentially affecting figures like Melania Trump. High-engagement posts highlight both enthusiasm and backlash, with skepticism about its passage.

相关文章

Illustration depicting the U.S. Supreme Court reviewing a challenge to President Trump's birthright citizenship executive order, with three infants and their noncitizen parents in the foreground.
AI 生成的图像

Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to Trump Birthright Citizenship Order

由 AI 报道 AI 生成的图像 事实核查

Three infants born to noncitizen parents are at the center of Barbara v. Trump, a class‑action lawsuit challenging President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to limit birthright citizenship for some children born in the United States. The Supreme Court has agreed to review the dispute over the order, which targets babies whose mothers lack legal status or are in the country on temporary visas and whose fathers are neither U.S. citizens nor lawful permanent residents.

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to rule on President Donald Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship, drawing on 1960s precedents that affirm citizenship for those born on American soil regardless of parental status. These cases, often overlooked, involved denationalization efforts that affected over 120,000 Americans between 1946 and 1967. The rulings unanimously upheld the 14th Amendment's guarantee of citizenship by birth.

由 AI 报道

2024年新增美国公民中规模第三大的归化菲律宾人,对特朗普政府的公民身份剥夺举措日益焦虑。随着USCIS实施每月100-200个案件转介目标——此前报道详述——律师敦促采取防范措施,以防过去申请的潜在审计。

日本政府周五采纳了一揽子综合措施,以应对与外国人相关的问题,包括收紧土地收购和国籍规则的计划。这些政策旨在回应民众的不安和不公感。

由 AI 报道 事实核查

The U.S. House of Representatives has overwhelmingly approved a bill that would bar members of Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, the Palestine Liberation Organization and individuals involved in the October 7, 2023, attacks against Israel from entering the United States or receiving immigration benefits. The measure, authored by Rep. Tom McClintock, now heads to the Senate.

An excerpt published by The Daily Wire from an upcoming book by author Peter Schweizer recounts remarks attributed to SEIU leader Eliseo Medina in July 2009 arguing that immigration reform could eventually expand the electorate through naturalization, a claim the excerpt ties to broader Democratic political strategy.

由 AI 报道

在小马科斯总统优先推动反王朝法案后,阿克巴延党众议员Percival Cendaña批评众议院议长Faustino Dy III和议员Sandro Marcos提出的版本,警告称这些法案将通过允许家庭成员在政府不同层级任职来巩固而非遏制政治王朝——这违背了1987年宪法的意图。

 

 

 

此网站使用 cookie

我们使用 cookie 进行分析以改进我们的网站。阅读我们的 隐私政策 以获取更多信息。
拒绝