Sen. Bernie Moreno announces Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025 at press conference, with U.S. flag and symbolic dual citizenship imagery.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Republican senator introduces bill to end dual U.S. dual citizenship

AI에 의해 생성된 이미지
사실 확인됨

A bill introduced by Ohio Republican Senator Bernie Moreno would require many Americans with dual citizenship to choose between their U.S. nationality and another. The Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025 is framed by its supporters as enforcing exclusive loyalty to the United States, while critics warn it would create a tiered system of citizenship and face serious constitutional challenges.

On December 1, 2025, Senator Bernie Moreno, a Republican from Ohio, introduced the Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025 in the U.S. Senate, according to his office and multiple news reports.

The legislation targets U.S. citizens who also hold another nationality, generally requiring them to choose between retaining their American citizenship or the other. Under the bill, existing dual nationals would have one year after the law takes effect to renounce their foreign citizenship or relinquish U.S. citizenship; failure to do either would result in the person being treated as having voluntarily given up U.S. nationality under Section 349(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, according to summaries from Moreno’s office and legal analyses.

Moreno, who was born in Colombia and became a naturalized U.S. citizen at age 18, has said that being American should involve exclusive allegiance. In a statement released by his office and quoted widely in regional and national outlets, he said: “One of the greatest honors of my life was when I became an American citizen at 18, the first opportunity I could do so. It was an honor to pledge an Oath of Allegiance to the United States of America and ONLY to the United States of America! Being an American citizen is an honor and a privilege—and if you want to be an American, it’s all or nothing. It’s time to end dual citizenship for good.”

The bill is part of a broader Republican push to tighten the terms of citizenship and eligibility in public life. In recent months, Republicans in Congress have advanced measures such as the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, which would require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in federal elections, and some GOP lawmakers and allied groups have renewed calls to narrow birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment—though those efforts have not changed current law and would likely face constitutional challenges.

Legal experts note that Moreno’s proposal would collide with long-standing Supreme Court precedent. In cases such as Afroyim v. Rusk and Vance v. Terrazas, the Court held that Congress cannot strip citizenship without a citizen’s voluntary and intentional renunciation. Because the Exclusive Citizenship Act would deem people to have relinquished U.S. citizenship if they fail to act within a set period, analysts say it is likely to be tested in court if it advances.

Critics argue the measure would, in practice, create tiers of citizenship by forcing millions of dual nationals to choose between their legal rights and family, cultural or economic ties abroad. Advocacy organizations such as Voto Latino have condemned the bill as an attack on American multiculturalism, saying it would force Americans to choose between their citizenship and their identities. Some scholars also warn that tying citizenship more closely to exclusive national allegiance echoes approaches seen in more authoritarian systems.

Supporters of the bill, including Moreno and some conservative commentators, counter that it is intended to ensure “sole and exclusive allegiance” to the United States and to avoid potential conflicts of interest involving dual nationals. The legislation would direct the State Department and the Department of Homeland Security to create procedures to verify exclusive citizenship status and update federal records.

Birthright citizenship—rooted in the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause and reaffirmed by Supreme Court precedent—remains a central feature of U.S. law. While hard‑line immigration critics continue to press for changes through legislation or executive action, any effort to curtail it, like Moreno’s proposal to end dual citizenship, would face steep legal and political hurdles. For now, the Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025 stands as a symbolic marker of intensifying debates over loyalty, identity and what constitutes full American citizenship.

사람들이 말하는 것

Reactions on X to Sen. Bernie Moreno's Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025 are polarized. Supporters, including conservative influencers, hail it as a necessary measure for undivided U.S. loyalty and America First policy. Critics, from immigrants' rights groups to dual citizens, call it unconstitutional, discriminatory, and a threat to millions, potentially affecting figures like Melania Trump. High-engagement posts highlight both enthusiasm and backlash, with skepticism about its passage.

관련 기사

Illustration depicting the U.S. Supreme Court reviewing a challenge to President Trump's birthright citizenship executive order, with three infants and their noncitizen parents in the foreground.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to Trump Birthright Citizenship Order

AI에 의해 보고됨 AI에 의해 생성된 이미지 사실 확인됨

Three infants born to noncitizen parents are at the center of Barbara v. Trump, a class‑action lawsuit challenging President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to limit birthright citizenship for some children born in the United States. The Supreme Court has agreed to review the dispute over the order, which targets babies whose mothers lack legal status or are in the country on temporary visas and whose fathers are neither U.S. citizens nor lawful permanent residents.

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to rule on President Donald Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship, drawing on 1960s precedents that affirm citizenship for those born on American soil regardless of parental status. These cases, often overlooked, involved denationalization efforts that affected over 120,000 Americans between 1946 and 1967. The rulings unanimously upheld the 14th Amendment's guarantee of citizenship by birth.

AI에 의해 보고됨

2024년 신규 미국 시민 중 3번째로 큰 그룹인 귀화 필리핀인들은 트럼프 행정부의 귀화 박탈 추진에 점점 불안해지고 있다. USCIS가 이전 보도에서 상세히 다뤘던 월 100-200건의 사례 추천 목표를 시행하면서 변호사들은 과거 신청서에 대한 잠재적 감사에 대비한 보호 조치를 촉구한다.

일본 정부는 금요일 외국인 관련 문제를 해결하기 위한 포괄적인 대책 패키지를 채택했다. 이는 토지 취득과 국적에 대한 더 엄격한 규칙 계획을 포함하며, 시민들의 불안과 불공정 감정을 해소하기 위한 것이다.

AI에 의해 보고됨 사실 확인됨

The U.S. House of Representatives has overwhelmingly approved a bill that would bar members of Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, the Palestine Liberation Organization and individuals involved in the October 7, 2023, attacks against Israel from entering the United States or receiving immigration benefits. The measure, authored by Rep. Tom McClintock, now heads to the Senate.

An excerpt published by The Daily Wire from an upcoming book by author Peter Schweizer recounts remarks attributed to SEIU leader Eliseo Medina in July 2009 arguing that immigration reform could eventually expand the electorate through naturalization, a claim the excerpt ties to broader Democratic political strategy.

AI에 의해 보고됨

마르코스 주니어 대통령이 반왕조 법안을 우선 추진한 데 이어, 아크바얀당 하원의원 Percival Cendaña는 하원 의장 Faustino Dy III와 Sandro Marcos 의원이 제출한 버전을 비판하며, 이 법안들이 가족 구성원이 정부 각급에서 직위를 차지할 수 있게 함으로써 정치 왕조를 억제하기보다 굳건히 하는 것으로 경고했다—이는 1987년 헌법의 취지에 위배된다.

 

 

 

이 웹사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다

사이트를 개선하기 위해 분석을 위한 쿠키를 사용합니다. 자세한 내용은 개인정보 보호 정책을 읽으세요.
거부