Supreme Court moves Plaquemines Parish Chevron lawsuit to federal court

The US Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that a lawsuit by Plaquemines Parish against Chevron must be transferred from state to federal court, effectively voiding a $745 million judgment against the oil company. The decision stems from Chevron's activities during World War II as a military contractor off Louisiana's coast. Legal experts describe the move as frustrating but not a final win for the oil industry.

The Supreme Court ruled earlier this month that Plaquemines Parish's case accusing Chevron of damaging coastal wetlands through canal dredging and drilling should proceed in federal rather than state court. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that the company's work as a military contractor during World War II warranted the shift. This unanimous decision cancels the prior $745 million award from a Louisiana state court jury after a decade-long fight, requiring the case to restart nearby in federal court. “Frankly, it’s a ridiculous situation,” said Patrick Parenteau, emeritus professor at Vermont Law and Graduate School. “All this time and effort has gone into litigating these issues before a jury in Louisiana. Now you have to do it all over again, but you’re doing it sort of up the street in the federal courthouse.” Edward P. Richards, a law professor at Louisiana State University, noted surprise that the case was not originally in federal court, citing federal aspects like dredging in navigable waterways. He suggested even liberal justices agreed due to these factors. Louisiana faces severe coastal land loss—over 2,000 square miles in the last century, with a football field vanishing every 100 minutes—and expects another 3,000 square miles gone by 2050 without action. The ruling drew applause from the Trump administration, seen as more industry-friendly, but experts say oil companies still face a Louisiana jury. Governor Jeff Landry, a Republican and oil supporter who has called climate change a hoax, backs these parish lawsuits. The decision is unlikely to affect broader climate lawsuits from states like Hawaii and Rhode Island, which target oil companies' past disinformation.

Verwandte Artikel

Illustration of the Supreme Court with maps of redrawn districts in Louisiana and Alabama for a news article.
Bild generiert von KI

Supreme Court speeds up redistricting changes for southern states

Von KI berichtet Bild generiert von KI

The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a series of recent orders allowing Louisiana and Alabama to redraw congressional maps that eliminate Black opportunity districts. The rulings came in the Louisiana v. Callais case and related Alabama litigation. They mark a sharp shift in the court's approach to voting rights enforcement under the Voting Rights Act.

The U.S. Supreme Court issued an order on Monday allowing its April 29 decision in Louisiana v. Callais to take immediate effect, bypassing the usual 32-day waiting period. This enables Louisiana to cancel its congressional primaries and redraw maps before the 2026 midterms. The move sparked a sharp exchange between Justice Samuel Alito's concurrence and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissent.

Von KI berichtet

The Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling on April 29 that significantly limited the reach of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. The decision in Louisiana v. Callais has prompted several states to redraw congressional maps. Lawmakers in affected states have cited partisan reasons for the changes.

The U.S. Supreme Court has allowed its Louisiana v. Callais decision to take immediate effect, enabling states to redraw congressional maps in ways that could reduce minority representation.

Von KI berichtet

Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry (R) postponed the state's U.S. House primaries until at least mid-July via emergency executive order following the Supreme Court's April 29, 2026, ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, which struck down the congressional map as unconstitutional under the Voting Rights Act. The move, praised by President Trump and Speaker Mike Johnson but challenged by a lawsuit, has caused voter confusion amid ongoing early voting for other races, as Republicans eye redistricting gains.

In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's April 29, 2026, decision in Louisiana v. Callais declaring the state's congressional map an unconstitutional racial gerrymander (as covered previously in this series), Louisiana has suspended its upcoming primaries for U.S. House races. The ruling affects one of the state's two Democratic-held majority-Black districts. Other primaries, including U.S. Senate, proceed May 16.

Von KI berichtet

Virginia Democrats filed a lawsuit with the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday seeking to overturn a state court decision that struck down a voter-approved congressional map. The move comes after the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Louisiana v. Callais effectively weakened the Voting Rights Act, prompting several Southern states to redraw districts.

 

 

 

Diese Website verwendet Cookies

Wir verwenden Cookies für Analysen, um unsere Website zu verbessern. Lesen Sie unsere Datenschutzrichtlinie für weitere Informationen.
Ablehnen