Des militants manifestent à Montgomery pour défendre le droit de vote

Des milliers de personnes se sont rassemblées samedi à Montgomery, en Alabama, pour protester contre les récentes décisions de la Cour suprême concernant les circonscriptions électorales et pour retracer le parcours de la marche pour les droits civiques de 1965.

L'événement, baptisé All Roads Lead to the South, a attiré des participants venus en bus de Géorgie et de Caroline du Sud sur Dexter Avenue. Les manifestants visaient à relancer les efforts pour la représentation politique des Noirs après qu'une décision de 6 contre 3 de la Cour suprême a invalidé une circonscription à majorité noire en Louisiane. Les organisateurs de Fair Fight Action ont coordonné le rassemblement deux jours après le souvenir de l'anniversaire de la marche.

Articles connexes

Illustration of Supreme Court allowing Alabama's disputed congressional map
Image générée par IA

Supreme Court allows Alabama to use disputed congressional map

Rapporté par l'IA Image générée par IA

The Supreme Court issued a 6-3 unsigned order Tuesday night permitting Alabama to implement a congressional map that eliminates a district held by a Black Democrat. The decision applies and expands the Court's recent ruling in Louisiana v. Callais. Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's April 29 ruling in Callais v. Louisiana—which struck down a second majority-Black congressional district as racial gerrymandering—civil rights advocates in the Deep South have condemned the decision as a threat to Black representation. States including Alabama, Tennessee, and Louisiana are redrawing maps, prompting vows of lawsuits and midterm mobilization.

Rapporté par l'IA

The U.S. Supreme Court last week issued a ruling in Louisiana v. Callais that dismantled key elements of the Voting Rights Act. The decision has prompted swift redistricting efforts in multiple states. Revelations about the lead plaintiff have also surfaced.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on April 29 that Louisiana's congressional map, which included a second majority-Black district, constitutes an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the majority that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act requires proof of intentional discrimination, not just disparate impact. The decision, in Louisiana v. Callais, limits race-based redistricting and prompts new maps in several states.

Rapporté par l'IA

The Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling on April 29 that significantly limited the reach of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. The decision in Louisiana v. Callais has prompted several states to redraw congressional maps. Lawmakers in affected states have cited partisan reasons for the changes.

The U.S. Supreme Court issued an order on Monday allowing its April 29 decision in Louisiana v. Callais to take immediate effect, bypassing the usual 32-day waiting period. This enables Louisiana to cancel its congressional primaries and redraw maps before the 2026 midterms. The move sparked a sharp exchange between Justice Samuel Alito's concurrence and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissent.

Rapporté par l'IA

Protests demanding a re-run of local elections marred by ballot shortages continued for the ninth day on June 13.

 

 

 

Ce site utilise des cookies

Nous utilisons des cookies pour l'analyse afin d'améliorer notre site. Lisez notre politique de confidentialité pour plus d'informations.
Refuser