Supreme Court allows same-sex couples to co-own properties

The Supreme Court has ruled that same-sex couples can co-own properties under Article 148 of the Family Code, provided there is proof of contribution. This stems from the Josef v. Ursua case involving a house and lot dispute. The decision offers legal recognition to aspects of their relationships.

On February 11, 2026, the Supreme Court issued a decision in the Josef v. Ursua case, clarifying that same-sex couples can be recognized as co-owners of properties acquired during their cohabitation if there is evidence of joint contributions. Jennifer Josef filed a petition against her former partner Evalyn Ursua over a dispute involving the sale of a house and lot registered solely in Ursua's name. Initially, they agreed to sell the property and split the proceeds equally, but Ursua later refused to acknowledge Josef's co-ownership. The Regional Trial Court in Quezon City Branch 87 and the Court of Appeals denied Josef's petition, prompting her to elevate the case to the Supreme Court. Associate Justice Jhosep Lopez penned the ruling, supported by concurring opinions from Senior Associate Justice Marvic Leonen and Associate Justice Amy Lazaro-Javier. Article 147 of the Family Code applies to unmarried man-woman relationships, while Article 148 covers other cohabitations, including same-sex ones. Leonen stated, 'To be different is not to be abnormal. A same-sex relationship is a normal relationship and therefore should be covered by Article 148.' Lazaro-Javier supported extending protections to the LGBTQI+ community. Family law professor Flordeliza Vargas noted, 'It can affect other aspects of same-sex relationship because there is now a recognition under the law of their status as a relationship that our laws need to recognize and protect.' The decision remanded the case to Quezon City RTC for further proceedings. Although same-sex unions remain unrecognized in the Philippines, this ruling marks a significant step for LGBTQ+ rights, according to experts. Bahaghari chairperson Reyna Valmores Salinas welcomed it and called for marriage equality. The Philippine LGBT Chamber of Commerce urged passage of the Equality Bill and other measures.

関連記事

Activists in an Oregon park collect signatures for a ballot initiative to protect marriage equality, abortion rights, and gender-affirming care under a banner reading 'Equal Rights for All'.
AIによって生成された画像

オレゴンのキャンペーン、結婚の平等、中絶権、ジェンダー肯定ケアのための憲法上の保護を求める

AIによるレポート AIによって生成された画像 事実確認済み

オレゴンの連合が2026年の投票イニシアチブを推進し、州憲法を改正して結婚の平等、生殖アクセス、ジェンダー肯定ケアを明示的に保護しようとしている。Equal Rights for Allキャンペーンは、資格を得るために2026年夏までに約156,000の有効署名が必要だと述べている。主催者はその閾値を大幅に上回ることを目指し、初期のボランティアの勢いを報告している、とThe Nationによると。

Divorce in Kenya goes beyond ending a marriage to encompass financial rights and property division based on each spouse's contributions. Courts weigh factors like marriage duration, income, and lifestyle to ensure fairness. Recent rulings have clarified these laws.

AIによるレポート

The High Court has dismissed a woman's attempt to claim half of the property she alleged belonged to her ex-husband. The judge ruled that she failed to prove the property was marital. This decision underscores that marriage is not a business for acquiring assets.

Following President Marcos Jr.'s prioritization of an anti-dynasty bill, Akbayan Rep. Percival Cendaña criticized House versions filed by Speaker Faustino Dy III and Rep. Sandro Marcos, warning they would entrench rather than curb political dynasties by allowing family members to hold positions across government levels—contradicting the 1987 Constitution's intent.

AIによるレポート

In a follow-up to the San Luis Potosí 'Spouse Law' controversy, President Claudia Sheinbaum firmly rejected mandatory gender alternation for governorships on December 22, arguing the INE's parity quotas suffice. Morena continues to oppose the reform as unconstitutional.

A Tacloban court has convicted community journalist Frenchie Mae Cumpio and lay worker Mariel Domequil of terror financing after six years in preventive detention. The ruling, carrying sentences of 12 to 18 years, has drawn sharp criticism from press freedom advocates as an assault on journalism and human rights. Groups warn it exemplifies the misuse of anti-terrorism laws against government critics.

AIによるレポート

Argentina's Congress turned the 'Fiscal Innocence' bill into law on December 26, introducing tax system reforms that simplify declarations and update penalties. The measure aims to normalize patrimonial situations and draw undeclared savings into the formal economy. Critics view it as a disguised money laundering scheme, while supporters praise it for reducing fiscal persecution.

 

 

 

このウェブサイトはCookieを使用します

サイトを改善するための分析にCookieを使用します。詳細については、プライバシーポリシーをお読みください。
拒否