Supreme Court allows same-sex couples to co-own properties

The Supreme Court has ruled that same-sex couples can co-own properties under Article 148 of the Family Code, provided there is proof of contribution. This stems from the Josef v. Ursua case involving a house and lot dispute. The decision offers legal recognition to aspects of their relationships.

On February 11, 2026, the Supreme Court issued a decision in the Josef v. Ursua case, clarifying that same-sex couples can be recognized as co-owners of properties acquired during their cohabitation if there is evidence of joint contributions. Jennifer Josef filed a petition against her former partner Evalyn Ursua over a dispute involving the sale of a house and lot registered solely in Ursua's name. Initially, they agreed to sell the property and split the proceeds equally, but Ursua later refused to acknowledge Josef's co-ownership. The Regional Trial Court in Quezon City Branch 87 and the Court of Appeals denied Josef's petition, prompting her to elevate the case to the Supreme Court. Associate Justice Jhosep Lopez penned the ruling, supported by concurring opinions from Senior Associate Justice Marvic Leonen and Associate Justice Amy Lazaro-Javier. Article 147 of the Family Code applies to unmarried man-woman relationships, while Article 148 covers other cohabitations, including same-sex ones. Leonen stated, 'To be different is not to be abnormal. A same-sex relationship is a normal relationship and therefore should be covered by Article 148.' Lazaro-Javier supported extending protections to the LGBTQI+ community. Family law professor Flordeliza Vargas noted, 'It can affect other aspects of same-sex relationship because there is now a recognition under the law of their status as a relationship that our laws need to recognize and protect.' The decision remanded the case to Quezon City RTC for further proceedings. Although same-sex unions remain unrecognized in the Philippines, this ruling marks a significant step for LGBTQ+ rights, according to experts. Bahaghari chairperson Reyna Valmores Salinas welcomed it and called for marriage equality. The Philippine LGBT Chamber of Commerce urged passage of the Equality Bill and other measures.

Artigos relacionados

O Tribunal Superior determinou que a certidão de casamento não é o único fator considerado na partilha de bens após o fim de uma união. A decisão reconhece contribuições não financeiras, como o cuidado com familiares e o trabalho doméstico. O veredito decorre de um caso que envolveu duas décadas de dedicação à família.

Reportado por IA

Meghalaya High Court has permitted quashing POCSO cases in consensual 'Romeo-Juliet' teen relationships. Allahabad High Court ruled that a married person can live with a consenting adult woman. These judgments strengthen personal liberty.

India's Supreme Court indicated on Wednesday that uniform guidelines on judicial intervention in faith and rights disputes are neither feasible nor desirable, preferring case-by-case assessments. The observation came during the seventh day of hearings on the Sabarimala Temple entry reference.

Reportado por IA

O prefeito de Huechuraba, Maximiliano Luksic, apoiou a isenção de imposto predial para primeiras moradias de pessoas com mais de 65 anos, ao mesmo tempo em que pediu uma emenda ao Senado para que aqueles com condições financeiras continuem pagando.

 

 

 

Este site usa cookies

Usamos cookies para análise para melhorar nosso site. Leia nossa política de privacidade para mais informações.
Recusar