New York Times publishes leaked supreme court memos on 2016 clean power plan

The New York Times published leaked internal Supreme Court memos from 2016 on Saturday, revealing the justices' debate leading to a stay on President Barack Obama's Clean Power Plan. Chief Justice John Roberts pressed colleagues for swift action in the documents. The memos highlight concerns over the EPA rule's implementation amid lower court proceedings.

The memos, including a 'Memorandum to the Conference' from Roberts' chambers, show his push against the Clean Power Plan, an EPA rule aimed at shifting states' energy generation toward greener technology to combat climate change. Industry groups and Republican-led states challenged the plan, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit denied an emergency stay and scheduled oral arguments. Plaintiffs then sought Supreme Court intervention before that hearing, resulting in a 5-4 stay that halted the rule's enforcement despite compliance deadlines years away—2018 for states and 2022 for fossil fuel companies, as Justice Stephen Breyer noted in his memo. Justice Samuel Alito also weighed in, warning that failing to act could undermine the court's authority and institutional legitimacy, citing EPA comments as treating the rule as irreversible without court intervention. Roberts quoted an EPA administrator's interview expressing confidence in the plan's embedding into the system regardless of Congress, writing: 'I am of the mind that a rule designed to transform a substantial swath of the nation’s economy should be tested by this Court before it is presented as a fait accompli. But it seems that the EPA is sufficiently confident of this rule’s immediate implications that not even the combined efforts of Congress and the President could reverse its effects.' Memos from Justices Elena Kagan, Anthony Kennedy, and Sonia Sotomayor also surfaced, with Kagan previously calling the one-paragraph stay unprecedented. As first reported by Jodi Kantor and Adam Liptak in The New York Times, these documents shed light on the origins of the court's 'shadow docket' practice for emergency rulings.

관련 기사

U.S. Supreme Court building with ExxonMobil and Suncor lawyers entering amid Boulder climate activists protesting, illustrating the climate damages lawsuit appeal.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Supreme Court to hear bid by ExxonMobil and Suncor to move Boulder climate-damages case out of state court

AI에 의해 보고됨 AI에 의해 생성된 이미지 사실 확인됨

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review a Colorado Supreme Court ruling that let Boulder and Boulder County pursue state-law tort claims against ExxonMobil and Suncor over alleged climate-change harms, a case with potential implications for similar lawsuits around the country.

The Supreme Court is set to issue rulings in nearly two dozen cases over the next few weeks, including several high-stakes matters involving immigration and presidential authority.

AI에 의해 보고됨

The Supreme Court is preparing to issue major rulings in the coming weeks on issues including birthright citizenship and executive power.

이 웹사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다

사이트를 개선하기 위해 분석을 위한 쿠키를 사용합니다. 자세한 내용은 개인정보 보호 정책을 읽으세요.
거부