P Chidambaram critiques US invasion of Venezuela

Former Union Minister P Chidambaram has criticized US President Donald Trump's invasion of Venezuela as a violation of the Monroe Doctrine in his column. He termed it the Bush-Trump doctrine and saw it as a sign of imperialism's return. He also questioned India's neutrality on the issue.

Two hundred years after the Monroe Doctrine was declared by the fifth US President in 1823, it was invoked by the 47th President despite doubts about its power. On the night of January 2/3, 2026, President Donald Trump used US military power to invade Venezuela, capture elected President Nicolas Maduro, and take him to face trial in a New York criminal court. Chidambaram described this as a transgression of every basic tenet of the doctrine, noting no foreign power had interfered in Venezuela's affairs.

Maduro was elected by the people, though the election was bitterly contested, and he had turned undemocratic and authoritarian. Chidambaram called the new approach the Bush-Trump doctrine, drawing parallels to the 1989 US invasion of Panama under George Bush Sr., aimed at regime change. He referenced the failed Iraq invasion in 2003 over fabricated WMD threats and the 2001-2021 Afghanistan war against al Qaeda and the Taliban as part of the 'war on terror'. In Venezuela, Maduro was accused of drug trafficking and narcotics smuggling into the US, but without public evidence.

From Trump's statements, it was clear Maduro was a casualty in the pursuit of controlling Venezuela's vast oil reserves, the world's largest, which were shifting toward China for exports, arms, and investment. Shortly after the capture, Trump said large US oil companies would be allowed to 'produce and sell' Venezuelan oil and 'make money'. The four-hour Operation Absolute Resolve demonstrated US military superiority, snatching Maduro from a heavily protected presidential house without casualties.

Chidambaram warned that this gives a free pass to imperialism, potentially emboldening Russia and China—Trump hinted at grabbing Greenland, and China might intrude into India's borders. India remained unnoticed; Trump snubbed Narendra Modi twice, and India's official statement on 'recent developments in Venezuela' urged peaceful dialogue without condemning the US or Maduro's capture. Chidambaram noted India is isolated among BRICS founders and Europe, losing relevance in world affairs despite 'Vishwaguru' claims. He portrayed Trump as the most interventionist US president in history, tallying actions in Palestine, Iran, Syria, Yemen, Nigeria, and now Venezuela, mourning the return of imperialism and the demise of national sovereignty.

Artigos relacionados

Trump dismisses Machado's leadership role after U.S. detains Maduro, with oil price spikes and prisoner release calls.
Imagem gerada por IA

Trump descarta papel de Machado após EUA deterem Maduro

Reportado por IA Imagem gerada por IA

Na sequência do ataque dos EUA ao Venezuela e da detenção do presidente Nicolás Maduro, Donald Trump rejeitou a capacidade da líder da oposição María Corina Machado de liderar uma transição democrática. A atitude alimentou especulações sobre um acordo com aliados chavistas de Maduro, em meio a temores de aumento nos preços do petróleo. A figura da oposição Edmundo González renovou os apelos pela libertação de prisioneiros políticos.

Global reactions continue to pour in after the U.S. military operation on January 3, 2026, that captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. India now faces a diplomatic bind, as the unilateral U.S. action under President Donald Trump conflicts with New Delhi's advocacy for a rules-based international order and non-intervention—principles many in the Global South expect India to uphold.

Reportado por IA

Após o ataque militar dos EUA em 3 de janeiro de 2026 que capturou o presidente venezuelano Nicolás Maduro por acusações de drogas, autoridades americanas de ambos os partidos expressaram preocupações significativas sobre a legalidade, constitucionalidade e alinhamento da operação com os princípios da política externa dos EUA, provocando um debate intenso.

New reactions to the January 3, 2026, US capture of Nicolás Maduro highlight contradictions among European nationalists, as French divisions persist amid fears of Trump alienating support for Ukraine.

Reportado por IA

O presidente Trump expressou intenções de tomar o controle do petróleo da Venezuela e anexar a Groenlândia, enquadrando esses movimentos como essenciais para o sucesso dos EUA. Essas ações, parte de uma 'Doutrina Donroe' mais ampla, sinalizam uma mudança para o imperialismo impulsionado por recursos no Hemisfério Ocidental. Críticos alertam para um retrocesso às políticas da era colonial em meio a tendências autoritárias crescentes.

Após a captura de Nicolás Maduro pelos EUA em 3 de janeiro de 2026, o presidente Donald Trump acusou o presidente colombiano Gustavo Petro de laços com o tráfico de drogas, levando a Colômbia a implantar 11.000 tropas ao longo de sua fronteira compartilhada, temendo influxos de refugiados e instabilidade regional.

Reportado por IA

No início da manhã de 3 de janeiro de 2026, forças dos EUA realizaram uma operação em grande escala em Caracas, capturando o presidente venezuelano Nicolás Maduro e sua esposa Cilia Flores, que enfrentam acusações dos EUA por narco-terrorismo e tráfico de drogas. O presidente Donald Trump anunciou a ação via Truth Social, afirmando que os EUA administrarão temporariamente a Venezuela para garantir uma transição estável. A medida gerou divisões acentuadas, com democratas a denunciando como inconstitucional e republicanos a elogiando como decisiva.

 

 

 

Este site usa cookies

Usamos cookies para análise para melhorar nosso site. Leia nossa política de privacidade para mais informações.
Recusar