Members of the House and Senate Armed Services committees have viewed the full video of a September 2 U.S. military strike on a suspected drug-smuggling boat, after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth declined to release the footage to the public. The viewing has sharpened partisan divisions over the Trump administration’s expanding campaign against Venezuela-linked narcotics networks.
Members of the House and Senate Armed Services committees were scheduled to see — and on Wednesday did see — the full video of a controversial U.S. strike on a small boat earlier this year, according to reporting by NPR. The Pentagon has said the vessel was involved in drug trafficking near Venezuela, while critics have questioned the legality of the operation.
NPR reports that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth decided the unedited recording would not be made public, limiting access instead to lawmakers on the House Armed Services Committee (HASC) and Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC). Committee members viewed the footage on December 17 as part of ongoing oversight of the strikes.
According to recent congressional and media accounts, the September 2 attack has drawn particular scrutiny because of allegations that a follow-on strike killed survivors in the water after the initial hit on the boat. Lawmakers are reviewing whether the operation complied with the laws of armed conflict, especially rules governing the treatment of shipwrecked or otherwise incapacitated persons. The Pentagon has defended the broader campaign as a lawful effort to disrupt narcotics smuggling operations tied to Venezuelan networks.
Supporters of the campaign, including many Republicans, frame the strikes as a necessary extension of long-running counterterrorism and counternarcotics efforts. Critics — among them some military lawyers and human rights advocates — have warned that certain tactics, particularly so‑called double‑tap strikes on survivors, could amount to unlawful killings under international law. The dispute has deepened partisan divides in Congress over how far the United States may go in pursuing alleged narco‑terror groups at sea.
Senate Majority and Minority leaders have both pressed for greater clarity on the legal framework governing the Caribbean and eastern Pacific operations, although they differ sharply on the scope of presidential authority. Some Democrats have described elements of the campaign as “deeply troubling,” pointing to the secrecy surrounding the September 2 boat strike and the Pentagon’s refusal so far to release the full video to the public.
Democratic Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, however, has publicly rejected portrayals of the strikes as indiscriminate. In a recent interview with NewsNation highlighted by The Daily Wire, he said some media coverage wrongly suggested "the military’s just picking off any boat that comes across." "That’s just not true," Fetterman said, arguing that there is “extensive intelligence” behind the operations and that commanders "know exactly who’s on that boat and they know what’s actually on that boat." He emphasized that, in his view, commanders act only when they have a high degree of confidence about the target and often decline to strike when that standard is not met.
The maritime campaign forms part of a broader U.S. pressure strategy against Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. The Daily Wire, citing U.S. officials, reports that since September the U.S. military has struck more than 20 boats and semi‑submersible vessels in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean in operations targeting suspected narco‑terrorists. The outlet also reports that, last week, U.S. forces seized an oil tanker off the coast of Venezuela tied to the country’s state‑owned oil sector, aiming to cut off a key source of revenue for Maduro’s government.
In public remarks this month, President Donald Trump ordered what he called a “complete blockade” of sanctioned oil tankers entering and leaving Venezuela, accusing the Maduro regime of stealing oil and land. In his comments, and in statements by senior aides, the administration has linked Venezuelan oil revenue to support from Iran, Russia and China, arguing that funds from sanctioned shipments can ultimately help finance terrorism and other illicit activities.
As Congress reviews the classified video and weighs new reporting requirements for the Pentagon, lawmakers in both parties say they expect further briefings and legal analysis on the September 2 strike and the broader maritime campaign. The central questions they face are whether the operations are effective in curbing narcotics flows — and whether they remain within the bounds of U.S. and international law.
