International criticism of U.S. withdrawal from 66 global organizations

Following President Donald Trump's executive order withdrawing the U.S. from 66 international organizations, Chinese experts and officials have sharply criticized the move as undermining global governance and U.S. credibility.

President Donald Trump's Wednesday executive order—announced earlier in the day—withdrawing the U.S. from 66 international bodies has drawn swift international backlash, particularly from China.

The order targets organizations the administration deems ineffective or harmful to U.S. interests, including key climate bodies like the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (basis for the Paris Agreement), UN Women, and the UN Population Fund.

Yuan Sha, deputy director of the China Institute of International Studies' Department for Global Governance and International Organizations, highlighted the focus on climate, environmental, education, health, and development aid groups. She warned of a "considerable negative impact," including financial crises as the U.S. funds about 20% of the UN system's budget. "They are likely to face operational and functional crises," Yuan said, adding that it could undermine these organizations' effectiveness and authority.

Zhu Jiejin, deputy director of Fudan University's Center for the Study of the UN and International Organizations, called it a departure from international norms, noting the unprecedented speed and scale compared to Trump's first term. "The Trump administration is now bypassing those protocols by directly ceasing participation and funding," Zhu said, citing the recent shutdown of the U.S. Agency for International Development.

At a Thursday briefing, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning reaffirmed China's commitment to multilateralism and the UN's role in global affairs.

Experts frame the U.S. actions as "America First" unilateralism, eroding multilateralism. "Trump's approach of 'use it if it fits, quit if it doesn't' prioritizes absolute national interests," Zhu argued, warning of a return to 'law of the jungle.' Yuan noted other nations would seek to fill the gaps.

Awọn iroyin ti o ni ibatan

Illustration of Trump announcing the Board of Peace amid mixed international reactions, with a world map highlighting acceptances and declines.
Àwòrán tí AI ṣe

Trump's Board of Peace elicits mixed global responses

Ti AI ṣe iroyin Àwòrán tí AI ṣe

U.S. President Donald Trump has initiated the Board of Peace to address global conflicts, beginning with Gaza. While numerous countries have accepted invitations, several European allies have declined. Diplomats warn that the initiative could undermine the United Nations' work.

President Donald Trump has signed an executive order pulling the United States out of 66 international organizations, many focused on climate and gender issues. The move follows a review ordered by Trump in February and targets groups deemed harmful to American interests by the administration. Officials emphasized prioritizing US sovereignty and economic priorities.

Ti AI ṣe iroyin

The United States has withdrawn from an international organization focused on internet freedom, prompting warnings from digital rights experts. They argue that Americans should be concerned about the implications for global digital standards. Critics highlight the risk of China gaining more influence in setting these standards.

A US Supreme Court ruling on tariffs may weaken President Trump's negotiating position with Chinese President Xi Jinping ahead of a Beijing summit. However, this does not automatically give China an edge. Experts note that Beijing must offer concessions for Trump to claim a success in his transactional style.

Ti AI ṣe iroyin

Despite rising international tensions, countries still seek cooperation based on shared interests. An opinion piece in the South China Morning Post argues that multilateral institutions must embrace this trend to address today's economically diffuse, environmentally constrained, and politically fragmented world.

The Trump administration has released a new National Security Strategy that breaks with previous U.S. policy blueprints, according to The Nation. The document is described as abandoning an explicit goal of global hegemony while emphasizing culture-war politics in Europe, economic competition with China, and renewed U.S. military dominance in the Western Hemisphere—an agenda analysts say exposes contradictions at the heart of Trump’s foreign policy.

Ti AI ṣe iroyin

A recent episode of CGTN Español's "Coffee and Tea" podcast explores the development concept proposed by Chinese President Xi Jinping a decade ago, based on five fundamental pillars. The program contrasts this vision with U.S. withdrawals from UN organizations and highlights multilateralism's importance in global challenges like public health. Experts from Argentina, Costa Rica, and Cuba participate, along with the Granma newspaper.

 

 

 

Ojú-ìwé yìí nlo kuki

A nlo kuki fun itupalẹ lati mu ilọsiwaju wa. Ka ìlànà àṣírí wa fun alaye siwaju sii.
Kọ