International criticism of U.S. withdrawal from 66 global organizations

Following President Donald Trump's executive order withdrawing the U.S. from 66 international organizations, Chinese experts and officials have sharply criticized the move as undermining global governance and U.S. credibility.

President Donald Trump's Wednesday executive order—announced earlier in the day—withdrawing the U.S. from 66 international bodies has drawn swift international backlash, particularly from China.

The order targets organizations the administration deems ineffective or harmful to U.S. interests, including key climate bodies like the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (basis for the Paris Agreement), UN Women, and the UN Population Fund.

Yuan Sha, deputy director of the China Institute of International Studies' Department for Global Governance and International Organizations, highlighted the focus on climate, environmental, education, health, and development aid groups. She warned of a "considerable negative impact," including financial crises as the U.S. funds about 20% of the UN system's budget. "They are likely to face operational and functional crises," Yuan said, adding that it could undermine these organizations' effectiveness and authority.

Zhu Jiejin, deputy director of Fudan University's Center for the Study of the UN and International Organizations, called it a departure from international norms, noting the unprecedented speed and scale compared to Trump's first term. "The Trump administration is now bypassing those protocols by directly ceasing participation and funding," Zhu said, citing the recent shutdown of the U.S. Agency for International Development.

At a Thursday briefing, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning reaffirmed China's commitment to multilateralism and the UN's role in global affairs.

Experts frame the U.S. actions as "America First" unilateralism, eroding multilateralism. "Trump's approach of 'use it if it fits, quit if it doesn't' prioritizes absolute national interests," Zhu argued, warning of a return to 'law of the jungle.' Yuan noted other nations would seek to fill the gaps.

Artikel Terkait

Illustration of Trump announcing the Board of Peace amid mixed international reactions, with a world map highlighting acceptances and declines.
Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

Trump's Board of Peace elicits mixed global responses

Dilaporkan oleh AI Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

U.S. President Donald Trump has initiated the Board of Peace to address global conflicts, beginning with Gaza. While numerous countries have accepted invitations, several European allies have declined. Diplomats warn that the initiative could undermine the United Nations' work.

Presiden Donald Trump telah menandatangani perintah eksekutif yang menarik Amerika Serikat dari 66 organisasi internasional, banyak di antaranya berfokus pada isu iklim dan gender. Langkah ini mengikuti tinjauan yang diperintahkan Trump pada Februari dan menargetkan kelompok-kelompok yang dianggap merugikan kepentingan Amerika oleh pemerintahan. Pejabat menekankan prioritas kedaulatan AS dan prioritas ekonomi.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

Amerika Serikat telah mundur dari organisasi internasional yang berfokus pada kebebasan internet, memicu peringatan dari pakar hak digital. Mereka berpendapat bahwa warga Amerika harus khawatir terhadap implikasinya bagi standar digital global. Kritikus menyoroti risiko China memperoleh pengaruh lebih besar dalam menetapkan standar tersebut.

A US Supreme Court ruling on tariffs may weaken President Trump's negotiating position with Chinese President Xi Jinping ahead of a Beijing summit. However, this does not automatically give China an edge. Experts note that Beijing must offer concessions for Trump to claim a success in his transactional style.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

Despite rising international tensions, countries still seek cooperation based on shared interests. An opinion piece in the South China Morning Post argues that multilateral institutions must embrace this trend to address today's economically diffuse, environmentally constrained, and politically fragmented world.

Pemerintahan Trump telah merilis Strategi Keamanan Nasional baru yang berbeda dari cetak biru kebijakan AS sebelumnya, menurut The Nation. Dokumen tersebut digambarkan sebagai meninggalkan tujuan hegemoni global yang eksplisit sambil menekankan politik perang budaya di Eropa, persaingan ekonomi dengan China, dan dominasi militer AS yang diperbarui di Hemisfer Barat—sebuah agenda yang menurut analis mengungkap kontradiksi di jantung kebijakan luar negeri Trump.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

A recent episode of CGTN Español's "Coffee and Tea" podcast explores the development concept proposed by Chinese President Xi Jinping a decade ago, based on five fundamental pillars. The program contrasts this vision with U.S. withdrawals from UN organizations and highlights multilateralism's importance in global challenges like public health. Experts from Argentina, Costa Rica, and Cuba participate, along with the Granma newspaper.

 

 

 

Situs web ini menggunakan cookie

Kami menggunakan cookie untuk analisis guna meningkatkan situs kami. Baca kebijakan privasi kami untuk informasi lebih lanjut.
Tolak