International criticism of U.S. withdrawal from 66 global organizations

Following President Donald Trump's executive order withdrawing the U.S. from 66 international organizations, Chinese experts and officials have sharply criticized the move as undermining global governance and U.S. credibility.

President Donald Trump's Wednesday executive order—announced earlier in the day—withdrawing the U.S. from 66 international bodies has drawn swift international backlash, particularly from China.

The order targets organizations the administration deems ineffective or harmful to U.S. interests, including key climate bodies like the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (basis for the Paris Agreement), UN Women, and the UN Population Fund.

Yuan Sha, deputy director of the China Institute of International Studies' Department for Global Governance and International Organizations, highlighted the focus on climate, environmental, education, health, and development aid groups. She warned of a "considerable negative impact," including financial crises as the U.S. funds about 20% of the UN system's budget. "They are likely to face operational and functional crises," Yuan said, adding that it could undermine these organizations' effectiveness and authority.

Zhu Jiejin, deputy director of Fudan University's Center for the Study of the UN and International Organizations, called it a departure from international norms, noting the unprecedented speed and scale compared to Trump's first term. "The Trump administration is now bypassing those protocols by directly ceasing participation and funding," Zhu said, citing the recent shutdown of the U.S. Agency for International Development.

At a Thursday briefing, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning reaffirmed China's commitment to multilateralism and the UN's role in global affairs.

Experts frame the U.S. actions as "America First" unilateralism, eroding multilateralism. "Trump's approach of 'use it if it fits, quit if it doesn't' prioritizes absolute national interests," Zhu argued, warning of a return to 'law of the jungle.' Yuan noted other nations would seek to fill the gaps.

Artigos relacionados

Illustration of Trump announcing the Board of Peace amid mixed international reactions, with a world map highlighting acceptances and declines.
Imagem gerada por IA

Trump's Board of Peace elicits mixed global responses

Reportado por IA Imagem gerada por IA

U.S. President Donald Trump has initiated the Board of Peace to address global conflicts, beginning with Gaza. While numerous countries have accepted invitations, several European allies have declined. Diplomats warn that the initiative could undermine the United Nations' work.

O presidente Donald Trump assinou uma ordem executiva retirando os Estados Unidos de 66 organizações internacionais, muitas focadas em questões climáticas e de gênero. A medida segue uma revisão ordenada por Trump em fevereiro e visa grupos considerados prejudiciais aos interesses americanos pela administração. Autoridades enfatizaram priorizar a soberania dos EUA e prioridades econômicas.

Reportado por IA

Os Estados Unidos se retiraram de uma organização internacional focada na liberdade na internet, provocando alertas de especialistas em direitos digitais. Eles argumentam que os americanos devem se preocupar com as implicações para os padrões digitais globais. Críticos destacam o risco de a China ganhar mais influência na definição desses padrões.

A US Supreme Court ruling on tariffs may weaken President Trump's negotiating position with Chinese President Xi Jinping ahead of a Beijing summit. However, this does not automatically give China an edge. Experts note that Beijing must offer concessions for Trump to claim a success in his transactional style.

Reportado por IA

Despite rising international tensions, countries still seek cooperation based on shared interests. An opinion piece in the South China Morning Post argues that multilateral institutions must embrace this trend to address today's economically diffuse, environmentally constrained, and politically fragmented world.

A administração Trump lançou uma nova Estratégia de Segurança Nacional que rompe com os planos de política anteriores dos EUA, de acordo com The Nation. O documento é descrito como abandonando um objetivo explícito de hegemonia global enquanto enfatiza a política de guerra cultural na Europa, a competição econômica com a China e o renovado domínio militar dos EUA no Hemisfério Ocidental — uma agenda que analistas dizem expor contradições no coração da política externa de Trump.

Reportado por IA

Um episódio recente do podcast «Coffee and Tea» da CGTN Español explora o conceito de desenvolvimento proposto há uma década pelo presidente chinês Xi Jinping, baseado em cinco pilares fundamentais. O programa contrasta essa visão com as retiradas dos EUA de organizações da ONU e destaca a importância do multilateralismo em desafios globais como a saúde pública. Participam especialistas da Argentina, Costa Rica e Cuba, além do jornal Granma.

 

 

 

Este site usa cookies

Usamos cookies para análise para melhorar nosso site. Leia nossa política de privacidade para mais informações.
Recusar