International criticism of U.S. withdrawal from 66 global organizations

Following President Donald Trump's executive order withdrawing the U.S. from 66 international organizations, Chinese experts and officials have sharply criticized the move as undermining global governance and U.S. credibility.

President Donald Trump's Wednesday executive order—announced earlier in the day—withdrawing the U.S. from 66 international bodies has drawn swift international backlash, particularly from China.

The order targets organizations the administration deems ineffective or harmful to U.S. interests, including key climate bodies like the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (basis for the Paris Agreement), UN Women, and the UN Population Fund.

Yuan Sha, deputy director of the China Institute of International Studies' Department for Global Governance and International Organizations, highlighted the focus on climate, environmental, education, health, and development aid groups. She warned of a "considerable negative impact," including financial crises as the U.S. funds about 20% of the UN system's budget. "They are likely to face operational and functional crises," Yuan said, adding that it could undermine these organizations' effectiveness and authority.

Zhu Jiejin, deputy director of Fudan University's Center for the Study of the UN and International Organizations, called it a departure from international norms, noting the unprecedented speed and scale compared to Trump's first term. "The Trump administration is now bypassing those protocols by directly ceasing participation and funding," Zhu said, citing the recent shutdown of the U.S. Agency for International Development.

At a Thursday briefing, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning reaffirmed China's commitment to multilateralism and the UN's role in global affairs.

Experts frame the U.S. actions as "America First" unilateralism, eroding multilateralism. "Trump's approach of 'use it if it fits, quit if it doesn't' prioritizes absolute national interests," Zhu argued, warning of a return to 'law of the jungle.' Yuan noted other nations would seek to fill the gaps.

Relaterade artiklar

Illustration of Trump announcing the Board of Peace amid mixed international reactions, with a world map highlighting acceptances and declines.
Bild genererad av AI

Trump's Board of Peace elicits mixed global responses

Rapporterad av AI Bild genererad av AI

U.S. President Donald Trump has initiated the Board of Peace to address global conflicts, beginning with Gaza. While numerous countries have accepted invitations, several European allies have declined. Diplomats warn that the initiative could undermine the United Nations' work.

President Donald Trump har undertecknat ett exekutivt direktiv som drar tillbaka USA från 66 internationella organisationer, många inriktade på klimat- och jämställdhetsfrågor. Åtgärden följer en granskning som Trump beordrade i februari och riktar sig mot grupper som administrationen bedömer som skadliga för amerikanska intressen. Tjänstemän betonade prioritering av amerikansk suveränitet och ekonomiska prioriteringar.

Rapporterad av AI

USA har dragit sig ur en internationell organisation fokuserad på internetfrihet, vilket väckt varningar från digitala rättighetsexperter. De menar att amerikaner bör oroa sig för konsekvenserna för globala digitala standarder. Kritiker pekar på risken att Kina får större inflytande över dessa standarder.

A US Supreme Court ruling on tariffs may weaken President Trump's negotiating position with Chinese President Xi Jinping ahead of a Beijing summit. However, this does not automatically give China an edge. Experts note that Beijing must offer concessions for Trump to claim a success in his transactional style.

Rapporterad av AI

Despite rising international tensions, countries still seek cooperation based on shared interests. An opinion piece in the South China Morning Post argues that multilateral institutions must embrace this trend to address today's economically diffuse, environmentally constrained, and politically fragmented world.

Trumpadministrationen har släppt en ny nationell säkerhetsstrategi som bryter med tidigare amerikanska policydokument, enligt The Nation. Dokumentet beskrivs som att det överger ett explicit mål om global hegemoni samtidigt som det betonar kulturkrigspolitik i Europa, ekonomisk konkurrens med Kina och förnyad amerikansk militär dominans i Västra hemisfären – en agenda som analytiker säger avslöjar motsägelser i hjärtat av Trumps utrikespolitik.

Rapporterad av AI

A recent episode of CGTN Español's "Coffee and Tea" podcast explores the development concept proposed by Chinese President Xi Jinping a decade ago, based on five fundamental pillars. The program contrasts this vision with U.S. withdrawals from UN organizations and highlights multilateralism's importance in global challenges like public health. Experts from Argentina, Costa Rica, and Cuba participate, along with the Granma newspaper.

 

 

 

Denna webbplats använder cookies

Vi använder cookies för analys för att förbättra vår webbplats. Läs vår integritetspolicy för mer information.
Avböj