US Supreme Court rules Line 5 pipeline case stays in Michigan state court

The U.S. Supreme Court has unanimously decided that Michigan's dispute over the Line 5 oil pipeline belongs in state court, advancing the state's long effort to potentially shut it down. The ruling clears the path for judges to assess risks from the pipeline's crossing of the Straits of Mackinac. Attorney General Dana Nessel hailed the decision as a victory against the threat of a catastrophic spill.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote for the unanimous court that Enbridge Energy waited too long to seek federal jurisdiction, dismissing the company's arguments. The Canadian-owned pipeline spans 645 miles from Superior, Wisconsin, to Sarnia, Ontario, including a 4.5-mile segment along the lakebed of the Straits of Mackinac, which connect Lakes Michigan and Huron. Nessel has sought to revoke the easement since 2019, citing spill risks to the Great Lakes. “For far too long, following years of Enbridge’s delay tactics, the fear of a catastrophic spill from Line 5 has haunted our state,” she said in a statement. Enbridge argued for federal court due to safety laws and international ties, noting Canada's reliance on the line for half its oil supply to Ontario and Quebec. Michigan countered that it concerns state resource management. Legal experts view the ruling as significant. Andy Buschbaum of the Great Lakes Business Network called it a “big deal,” allowing state courts to decide if the pipeline should remain under the Great Lakes or pursue alternatives. All 12 Michigan tribes support shutdown, citing threats to waters and treaty rights. Whitney Gravelle, president of the Bay Mills Indian Community, said it creates space to uplift tribal voices. The case awaits resolution of a related federal appeal: Enbridge sued Governor Gretchen Whitmer in 2021 over her shutdown attempt, with the Sixth Circuit ruling for the company last November. Enbridge spokesperson Ryan Duffy emphasized federal safety findings of no issues warranting closure. Meanwhile, Enbridge seeks permits for a replacement tunnel, with decisions pending this summer.

相关文章

U.S. Supreme Court building with ExxonMobil and Suncor lawyers entering amid Boulder climate activists protesting, illustrating the climate damages lawsuit appeal.
AI 生成的图像

Supreme Court to hear bid by ExxonMobil and Suncor to move Boulder climate-damages case out of state court

由 AI 报道 AI 生成的图像 事实核查

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review a Colorado Supreme Court ruling that let Boulder and Boulder County pursue state-law tort claims against ExxonMobil and Suncor over alleged climate-change harms, a case with potential implications for similar lawsuits around the country.

The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments on whether the controversial Line 5 pipeline case belongs in state or federal court. Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel seeks to shut down the pipeline due to risks to the Great Lakes, while Enbridge Energy argues for federal oversight. The procedural dispute could affect the pipeline's operation across the Straits of Mackinac.

由 AI 报道

The U.S. Supreme Court is considering a narrow procedural question in a dispute over the Line 5 oil pipeline, which could decide whether Michigan state courts or federal courts handle the case. The pipeline crosses the ecologically sensitive Straits of Mackinac, sacred to Anishinaabe peoples and protected by treaty rights for several tribal nations. Michigan officials seek to shut it down due to spill risks, while Enbridge argues for its continued operation.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on February 20, 2026, in Learning Resources v. Trump that President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) exceeded his authority. Chief Justice John Roberts' majority opinion invoked the major-questions doctrine to limit executive power over taxation, while concurring liberal justices emphasized statutory text and legislative history. The decision, expedited due to ongoing tariff revenue collection, spares some targeted duties but introduces uncertainty amid Trump's vows for alternatives.

由 AI 报道

President Donald Trump has threatened to prevent the opening of the Gordie Howe International Bridge connecting Windsor, Ontario, to Detroit, Michigan, citing ongoing trade imbalances with Canada. The bridge, under construction for nearly eight years, is set to open this year but could face delays due to Trump's stance on tariffs and Canada's trade talks with China. Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer remains confident in the project's completion.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York overturned on Friday the first-instance ruling ordering Argentina to pay over $16 billion for the 2012 YPF expropriation. President Javier Milei hailed the decision as a historic victory and criticized former Kirchnerist officials. The ruling averts a massive payout, though Burford Capital said it will appeal.

由 AI 报道 事实核查

A federal appeals court on Friday ruled that President Donald Trump’s proclamation describing migration at the U.S.-Mexico border as an “invasion” and using that finding to suspend access to asylum exceeds the authority Congress granted in immigration law. The decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit could require the government to restart at-the-border asylum processing, though the administration has indicated it plans to seek further review.

此网站使用 cookie

我们使用 cookie 进行分析以改进我们的网站。阅读我们的 隐私政策 以获取更多信息。
拒绝