Louisiana suspends U.S. House primaries after Callais ruling

In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's April 29, 2026, decision in Louisiana v. Callais declaring the state's congressional map an unconstitutional racial gerrymander (as covered previously in this series), Louisiana has suspended its upcoming primaries for U.S. House races. The ruling affects one of the state's two Democratic-held majority-Black districts. Other primaries, including U.S. Senate, proceed May 16.

The Supreme Court, in a majority opinion by Justice Samuel Alito, ruled that “the State’s attempt to satisfy the Middle District’s ruling, although understandable, was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.” A prior stay on an injunction ended with the 6-3 decision, enjoining elections under the current map.

Gov. Jeff Landry (R) and Attorney General Liz Murrill announced the suspension Thursday, stating they are coordinating with the legislature and Secretary of State’s office for a new map. Landry's executive order, he said, prevents elections under an invalid map to protect voter rights and system integrity, giving lawmakers time for a fair redraw.

Secretary of State Nancy Landry clarified that U.S. House races stay on ballots, but votes won't be counted; notices begin at early voting sites Saturday, though absentee ballots are out. Timeline for resumption unclear, with the Republican-led legislature expected to act, potentially eliminating a Democratic seat.

Rep. Troy Carter (D), Louisiana's sole Democratic congressman, decried the ruling as a “devastating blow,” warning of jeopardized progress for majority-Black districts and challenges for Black voters electing preferred candidates without Voting Rights Act safeguards.

Mga Kaugnay na Artikulo

Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry signs executive order postponing U.S. House primaries after Supreme Court strikes down congressional map.
Larawang ginawa ng AI

Louisiana Gov. Landry postpones House primaries after Supreme Court Callais ruling on congressional map

Iniulat ng AI Larawang ginawa ng AI

Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry (R) postponed the state's U.S. House primaries until at least mid-July via emergency executive order following the Supreme Court's April 29, 2026, ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, which struck down the congressional map as unconstitutional under the Voting Rights Act. The move, praised by President Trump and Speaker Mike Johnson but challenged by a lawsuit, has caused voter confusion amid ongoing early voting for other races, as Republicans eye redistricting gains.

Following the U.S. Supreme Court's April 29, 2026, Callais v. Louisiana decision striking down Louisiana's congressional map as a racial gerrymander (as covered in this series), experts warn the reinterpretation of Voting Rights Act protections could endanger minority representation nationwide. Louisiana has extended suspension of its U.S. House primaries until at least July 2026 amid expectations of a redraw.

Iniulat ng AI

The U.S. Supreme Court issued an order on Monday allowing its April 29 decision in Louisiana v. Callais to take immediate effect, bypassing the usual 32-day waiting period. This enables Louisiana to cancel its congressional primaries and redraw maps before the 2026 midterms. The move sparked a sharp exchange between Justice Samuel Alito's concurrence and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissent.

The US Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision in Callais v. Louisiana, significantly weakening Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act following October 2025 oral arguments. Critics argue the ruling, led by the Republican-appointed majority, invites states to redraw maps entrenching racial disenfranchisement. Republicans expressed satisfaction with the outcome.

Iniulat ng AI

In a follow-up to its April 29 ruling in Callais v. Louisiana, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an unsigned order on May 5 allowing the decision—striking down the state's congressional map as a racial gerrymander—to take effect immediately. Justice Samuel Alito, in a concurrence, sharply criticized Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's lone dissent as 'baseless' and 'insulting,' highlighting tensions amid 2026 election battles.

A POLITICO/Public First survey conducted May 9–11 finds a plurality of Democrats say their party should respond to Republican redistricting efforts even if it results in fewer majority-minority districts. The results come weeks after the Supreme Court’s April 29 decision in Louisiana v. Callais, which narrowed how Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act can be used in redistricting disputes.

Iniulat ng AI

South Carolina Republican lawmakers failed Tuesday to secure the votes needed to extend the legislative session and redraw congressional maps, stalling efforts pushed by President Donald Trump to eliminate the state's only Democratic-held House district.

 

 

 

Gumagamit ng cookies ang website na ito

Gumagamit kami ng cookies para sa analytics upang mapabuti ang aming site. Basahin ang aming patakaran sa privacy para sa higit pang impormasyon.
Tanggihan