Supreme Court rules Trump's tariffs under IEEPA unconstitutional

The US Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision on Friday ruling that President Donald Trump's tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act were unconstitutional. Trump responded by announcing new 10 percent global tariffs under a different statute, later raising them to 15 percent. The European Union has paused a recent trade deal with the US amid the resulting uncertainty.

In the case of Learning Resources, Inc v. Trump, the Supreme Court held that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) did not grant Trump the authority to impose the tariffs, leading to a 6-3 defeat for the administration. The majority opinion, supported by Chief Justice John Roberts, Justices Neil Gorsuch, Amy Coney Barrett, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson, decided the case without invoking the major questions doctrine, despite conservatives' debates over its application.

Trump held a press conference following the ruling, criticizing the justices as 'sleazebags' and 'slimeballs,' while praising dissenting Justice Brett Kavanaugh as a 'genius.' He then imposed new 10 percent global tariffs under a different statute, which he increased to 15 percent over the weekend, dismissing a 150-day expiration requirement and claiming clarity on his unilateral authority.

The decision has created uncertainty, including potential restitution for affected businesses and future tariff challenges. Justice Kavanaugh, in dissent joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, argued the doctrine does not apply in foreign affairs contexts, allowing presidents broad powers with minimal congressional authority. Conservatives like Roberts viewed tariffs as a major economic issue requiring the doctrine, while Gorsuch called it a constitutional principle and Barrett described it as a 'common sense' tool.

The ruling prompted the European Union to pause the Turnberry Deal, a July 2025 agreement establishing a 15 percent baseline tariff on EU imports, higher rates for steel and aluminum, and EU commitments to purchase $750 billion in US energy, invest $600 billion, and buy American military equipment. Bernd Lange, chair of the European Parliament’s international trade committee, stated the deal is 'on hold until further notice' due to lack of 'clarity & legal certainty.' He told CNBC that Trump's actions breached the deal and requested assurance of no new tariffs for three years.

Trump warned on Truth Social that countries 'playing games' with the decision would face higher tariffs. Kavanaugh's dissent noted the ruling could generate uncertainty around trade agreements under IEEPA. Separately, FedEx sued the administration on Monday for a full refund of tariffs paid under IEEPA.

Articles connexes

Symbolic photorealistic depiction of U.S. Supreme Court 6-3 ruling invalidating Trump's IEEPA tariffs, with gavel smashing documents.
Image générée par IA

Cour suprême 6-3 juge les tarifs IEEPA de Trump illégaux, appliquant la doctrine des grandes questions

Rapporté par l'IA Image générée par IA

La Cour suprême des États-Unis a statué 6-3 le 20 février 2026, dans l'affaire Learning Resources c. Trump, que les vastes tarifs imposés par le président Donald Trump en vertu de l'International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) excédaient son autorité. L'opinion majoritaire du juge en chef John Roberts a invoqué la doctrine des grandes questions pour limiter le pouvoir exécutif sur la taxation, tandis que les juges libéraux en concurrence ont mis l'accent sur le texte statutaire et l'histoire législative. Cette décision, accélérée en raison de la collecte en cours des recettes tarifaires, épargne certains droits ciblés mais introduit une incertitude au milieu des promesses de Trump pour des alternatives.

La Cour suprême des États-Unis a statué par 6 voix contre 3 vendredi que le président Trump ne peut pas utiliser la loi sur les pouvoirs d'urgence économique internationale pour imposer des droits de douane à grande échelle, provoquant des réactions immédiates de l'administration et de figures politiques. Trump a signé le lendemain un droit de douane mondial de 15 % sous une autre loi et a critiqué la Cour lundi. La décision a suscité des débats sur ses implications politiques avant les midterm et le discours sur l'état de l'Union.

Rapporté par l'IA

The US Supreme Court ruled against President Trump's use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose sweeping tariffs. The decision delivers a major setback to his trade policy and raises questions over deals with South Korea and others. Trump responded by ordering a new 10 percent global tariff.

U.S. President Donald Trump stated on January 20 during a press conference that he is 'anxiously' awaiting a Supreme Court ruling on the legality of his administration's global tariffs. He defended the levies for bolstering national security and federal revenue while noting that a potential refund process in case of a loss could be complicated. The Supreme Court did not issue a decision on the tariff case that day.

Rapporté par l'IA

La Cour suprême des États-Unis a déclaré illégales les tarifs réciproques et le tarif sur le fentanyl imposés par Donald Trump en vertu de l'IEEPA. Le Mexique conserve des tarifs zéro pour les biens conformes au T-MEC, mais les non conformes passent de 25 % à 15 %. Cela réduit l'avantage compétitif des exportations mexicaines non conformes.

Swedish economists and officials have criticized US President Donald Trump's escalation of global tariffs to 15% following the Supreme Court's invalidation of his prior levies, citing policy unseriousness and economic uncertainty for exporters. The government plans to assist companies via a hotline and push new trade deals.

Rapporté par l'IA

Le président indonésien Prabowo Subianto a exprimé la disposition de son pays à atténuer les risques liés à la hausse des tarifs douaniers mondiaux d'importation à 15 % par le président américain Donald Trump, annoncée le 21 février 2026, un jour après une décision de la Cour suprême invalidant les tarifs antérieurs. Les responsables ont affirmé que les négociations commerciales bilatérales se poursuivent, mettant en avant des accords à tarif zéro pour les principales exportations indonésiennes.

 

 

 

Ce site utilise des cookies

Nous utilisons des cookies pour l'analyse afin d'améliorer notre site. Lisez notre politique de confidentialité pour plus d'informations.
Refuser