Supreme Court rules Trump's tariffs under IEEPA unconstitutional

The US Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision on Friday ruling that President Donald Trump's tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act were unconstitutional. Trump responded by announcing new 10 percent global tariffs under a different statute, later raising them to 15 percent. The European Union has paused a recent trade deal with the US amid the resulting uncertainty.

In the case of Learning Resources, Inc v. Trump, the Supreme Court held that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) did not grant Trump the authority to impose the tariffs, leading to a 6-3 defeat for the administration. The majority opinion, supported by Chief Justice John Roberts, Justices Neil Gorsuch, Amy Coney Barrett, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson, decided the case without invoking the major questions doctrine, despite conservatives' debates over its application.

Trump held a press conference following the ruling, criticizing the justices as 'sleazebags' and 'slimeballs,' while praising dissenting Justice Brett Kavanaugh as a 'genius.' He then imposed new 10 percent global tariffs under a different statute, which he increased to 15 percent over the weekend, dismissing a 150-day expiration requirement and claiming clarity on his unilateral authority.

The decision has created uncertainty, including potential restitution for affected businesses and future tariff challenges. Justice Kavanaugh, in dissent joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, argued the doctrine does not apply in foreign affairs contexts, allowing presidents broad powers with minimal congressional authority. Conservatives like Roberts viewed tariffs as a major economic issue requiring the doctrine, while Gorsuch called it a constitutional principle and Barrett described it as a 'common sense' tool.

The ruling prompted the European Union to pause the Turnberry Deal, a July 2025 agreement establishing a 15 percent baseline tariff on EU imports, higher rates for steel and aluminum, and EU commitments to purchase $750 billion in US energy, invest $600 billion, and buy American military equipment. Bernd Lange, chair of the European Parliament’s international trade committee, stated the deal is 'on hold until further notice' due to lack of 'clarity & legal certainty.' He told CNBC that Trump's actions breached the deal and requested assurance of no new tariffs for three years.

Trump warned on Truth Social that countries 'playing games' with the decision would face higher tariffs. Kavanaugh's dissent noted the ruling could generate uncertainty around trade agreements under IEEPA. Separately, FedEx sued the administration on Monday for a full refund of tariffs paid under IEEPA.

Verwandte Artikel

Symbolic photorealistic depiction of U.S. Supreme Court 6-3 ruling invalidating Trump's IEEPA tariffs, with gavel smashing documents.
Bild generiert von KI

Supreme Court 6-3 Rules Trump's IEEPA Tariffs Unlawful, Applying Major-Questions Doctrine

Von KI berichtet Bild generiert von KI

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on February 20, 2026, in Learning Resources v. Trump that President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) exceeded his authority. Chief Justice John Roberts' majority opinion invoked the major-questions doctrine to limit executive power over taxation, while concurring liberal justices emphasized statutory text and legislative history. The decision, expedited due to ongoing tariff revenue collection, spares some targeted duties but introduces uncertainty amid Trump's vows for alternatives.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on Friday that President Trump cannot use the International Economic Emergency Powers Act to impose broad-scale tariffs, prompting immediate responses from the administration and political figures. Trump signed a 15% global tariff under a different law the next day and criticized the court on Monday. The decision has sparked debates over its political implications ahead of the midterms and the State of the Union address.

Von KI berichtet

The US Supreme Court ruled against President Trump's use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose sweeping tariffs. The decision delivers a major setback to his trade policy and raises questions over deals with South Korea and others. Trump responded by ordering a new 10 percent global tariff.

Der Oberste Gerichtshof der USA hat mit sechs zu drei Stimmen entschieden, dass Präsident Donald Trump seine Befugnisse überschritten hat, indem er Sonderzölle auf Importe aus Dutzenden Ländern verhängte. Die Zölle, die auf einer Notstandsregelung aus dem Jahr 1977 basierten, sind ungültig. Trump kündigt nun einen neuen allgemeinen Zoll von zehn Prozent an.

Von KI berichtet

US-Präsident Donald Trump unterzeichnete am Freitag (20) eine Verordnung, die einen 10%igen Zoll auf Importe aus allen Ländern verhängt, als Reaktion auf das Urteil des Obersten Gerichts, dass vorherige Zölle unter dem IEEPA-Gesetz illegal waren. Die neue Maßnahme tritt am 24. Februar in Kraft und dauert 150 Tage, wobei Artikel wie Rindfleisch, Orangen und kritische Mineralien ausgenommen sind. Für Brasilien verbessert der globale Satz die Wettbewerbsfähigkeit im Vergleich zu früheren reziproken Zöllen von bis zu 50%.

Präsident Donald Trump warnte den Obersten Gerichtshof der USA, dass ein Urteil gegen seine reziproken Zölle massives finanzielles Chaos auslösen würde, nach seinem Anruf mit der mexikanischen Präsidentin Claudia Sheinbaum. In einem Truth-Social-Post erklärte Trump, dass die Aufhebung der Zölle die Rückzahlung von Hunderten Milliarden Dollar und Auswirkungen auf Billionen an Investitionen erfordern würde. Das Gericht, skeptisch in einer November-Hörung, könnte die im April 2025 angekündigten Maßnahmen aufheben.

Von KI berichtet

Frankreich fordert einheitliche EU-Reaktion und Deutschland plant Gespräche mit Verbündeten, nachdem US-Präsident Donald Trump seine globalen Zölle am Samstag auf 15 % angehoben hat und damit ein Urteil des Obersten Gerichts missachtete, das seine anfänglichen Handelmaßnahmen aufhob. Die Erhöhung gilt sofort und trifft wichtige US-Partner einschließlich EU, Japan, Südkorea und Taiwan.

 

 

 

Diese Website verwendet Cookies

Wir verwenden Cookies für Analysen, um unsere Website zu verbessern. Lesen Sie unsere Datenschutzrichtlinie für weitere Informationen.
Ablehnen