Supreme Court rules Trump's tariffs under IEEPA unconstitutional

The US Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision on Friday ruling that President Donald Trump's tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act were unconstitutional. Trump responded by announcing new 10 percent global tariffs under a different statute, later raising them to 15 percent. The European Union has paused a recent trade deal with the US amid the resulting uncertainty.

In the case of Learning Resources, Inc v. Trump, the Supreme Court held that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) did not grant Trump the authority to impose the tariffs, leading to a 6-3 defeat for the administration. The majority opinion, supported by Chief Justice John Roberts, Justices Neil Gorsuch, Amy Coney Barrett, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson, decided the case without invoking the major questions doctrine, despite conservatives' debates over its application.

Trump held a press conference following the ruling, criticizing the justices as 'sleazebags' and 'slimeballs,' while praising dissenting Justice Brett Kavanaugh as a 'genius.' He then imposed new 10 percent global tariffs under a different statute, which he increased to 15 percent over the weekend, dismissing a 150-day expiration requirement and claiming clarity on his unilateral authority.

The decision has created uncertainty, including potential restitution for affected businesses and future tariff challenges. Justice Kavanaugh, in dissent joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, argued the doctrine does not apply in foreign affairs contexts, allowing presidents broad powers with minimal congressional authority. Conservatives like Roberts viewed tariffs as a major economic issue requiring the doctrine, while Gorsuch called it a constitutional principle and Barrett described it as a 'common sense' tool.

The ruling prompted the European Union to pause the Turnberry Deal, a July 2025 agreement establishing a 15 percent baseline tariff on EU imports, higher rates for steel and aluminum, and EU commitments to purchase $750 billion in US energy, invest $600 billion, and buy American military equipment. Bernd Lange, chair of the European Parliament’s international trade committee, stated the deal is 'on hold until further notice' due to lack of 'clarity & legal certainty.' He told CNBC that Trump's actions breached the deal and requested assurance of no new tariffs for three years.

Trump warned on Truth Social that countries 'playing games' with the decision would face higher tariffs. Kavanaugh's dissent noted the ruling could generate uncertainty around trade agreements under IEEPA. Separately, FedEx sued the administration on Monday for a full refund of tariffs paid under IEEPA.

Verwandte Artikel

Symbolic photorealistic depiction of U.S. Supreme Court 6-3 ruling invalidating Trump's IEEPA tariffs, with gavel smashing documents.
Bild generiert von KI

Supreme Court 6-3 Rules Trump's IEEPA Tariffs Unlawful, Applying Major-Questions Doctrine

Von KI berichtet Bild generiert von KI

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on February 20, 2026, in Learning Resources v. Trump that President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) exceeded his authority. Chief Justice John Roberts' majority opinion invoked the major-questions doctrine to limit executive power over taxation, while concurring liberal justices emphasized statutory text and legislative history. The decision, expedited due to ongoing tariff revenue collection, spares some targeted duties but introduces uncertainty amid Trump's vows for alternatives.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on Friday that President Trump cannot use the International Economic Emergency Powers Act to impose broad-scale tariffs, prompting immediate responses from the administration and political figures. Trump signed a 15% global tariff under a different law the next day and criticized the court on Monday. The decision has sparked debates over its political implications ahead of the midterms and the State of the Union address.

Von KI berichtet

The US Supreme Court ruled against President Trump's use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose sweeping tariffs. The decision delivers a major setback to his trade policy and raises questions over deals with South Korea and others. Trump responded by ordering a new 10 percent global tariff.

U.S. President Donald Trump stated on January 20 during a press conference that he is 'anxiously' awaiting a Supreme Court ruling on the legality of his administration's global tariffs. He defended the levies for bolstering national security and federal revenue while noting that a potential refund process in case of a loss could be complicated. The Supreme Court did not issue a decision on the tariff case that day.

Von KI berichtet

The US Supreme Court declared illegal the reciprocal tariffs and the fentanyl tariff imposed by Donald Trump under the IEEPA. Mexico keeps zero tariffs for T-MEC compliant goods, but non-compliant ones drop from 25% to 15%. This narrows the competitive edge of non-compliant Mexican exports.

Swedish economists and officials have criticized US President Donald Trump's escalation of global tariffs to 15% following the Supreme Court's invalidation of his prior levies, citing policy unseriousness and economic uncertainty for exporters. The government plans to assist companies via a hotline and push new trade deals.

Von KI berichtet

Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto expressed readiness to mitigate risks from US President Donald Trump's hike of global import tariffs to 15%, announced February 21, 2026, one day after a Supreme Court ruling invalidated prior tariffs. Officials affirmed that bilateral trade negotiations continue, highlighting zero-tariff deals for key Indonesian exports.

 

 

 

Diese Website verwendet Cookies

Wir verwenden Cookies für Analysen, um unsere Website zu verbessern. Lesen Sie unsere Datenschutzrichtlinie für weitere Informationen.
Ablehnen