Senate unanimously approves constitutional reform for judges council

The Senate chamber unanimously approved, with 31 votes in favor, the constitutional reform creating the Judicial Appointments Council and modifying judicial governance. The bill, pushed by the government in October 2024 after the Audio case scandal, aims to introduce radical changes in judge selection and judicial administration. Senators from various parties backed the initiative, though they requested indications for its refinement.

The constitutional reform bill, in its second constitutional stage, was approved in general during the Senate session on Tuesday, December 16, 2025. Initiated by the Executive in October 2024, it arose in response to the Audio case scandal, which involved lawyer Luis Hermosilla and affected figures in the Judicial Power, including judges and ministers.

Among the proposed changes, judicial governance is modified by removing courts from selecting slates for judge appointments and suppressing the Supreme Court's directive, correctional, and economic superintendency, established since 1833. The core of the reform is the creation of the Judicial Appointments Council, an autonomous body based on principles of objectivity, technicality, professionalism, independence, and merit, which will select candidates through effective opposition mechanisms. Additionally, an autonomous body is established for the administration and management of tribunal resources, excluding the Constitutional Court, Electoral Qualifying Court, and others defined by organic constitutional law.

The discussion received cross-party support, though senators raised observations. UDI Senator Juan Antonio Coloma backed the vote but criticized the lack of debate: “This is a constitutional reform, it's something important. Trying to open the vote without a minimum discussion goes against what I believe should be a debate in Congress.” Independent Senator Alejandra Sepúlveda highlighted the questioning of the Judicial Power: “If there's something that has surprised us all, it's how this fundamental state power is under constant questioning today.” FREVS Senator Esteban Velásquez emphasized autonomy: “The demands we all have... those who must administer justice must be autonomous, because otherwise, to some extent, the judicial system... ends up being a puppet.” RN Senator Francisco Chahuán, ineligible to vote, noted it requires modifications. PS Senator José Miguel Insulza saw few objections: “I see this as the beginning of a task.” Finally, UDI Senator Javier Macaya valued the new resource body: “It's by far the most relevant from the perspective of freeing the Supreme Court from a function that has diverted its jurisdictional focus.”

The deadline for submitting indications was set for Thursday, January 15, 2026. After approval, Senator Iván Moreira adjourned the session for a Christmas activity with staff.

Articoli correlati

Mexican Senate commissions approve Sheinbaum's 'Plan B' electoral reform with 24-11 vote in a tense session.
Immagine generata dall'IA

Le commissioni del Senato approvano la riforma elettorale 'Piano B' di Sheinbaum

Riportato dall'IA Immagine generata dall'IA

Le commissioni per i Punti Costituzionali e gli Studi Legislativi del Senato messicano hanno approvato il 24 marzo il progetto di riforma elettorale 'Piano B' della presidente Claudia Sheinbaum, a una settimana dalla sua presentazione. Il provvedimento è stato approvato con 24 voti favorevoli e 11 contrari dopo oltre cinque ore di dibattito e ora passa al plenum del Senato, nonostante l'opposizione del PT riguardo alla data del referendum revocatorio del 2027.

Chile's Supreme Court will elect its new president on Monday amid internal divisions and scandals like the Audio case and the Belarusian plot, which have eroded public trust in the judiciary. Tradition favors Gloria Ana Chevesich, but a group is pushing for María Angélica Repetto to break that practice. The election coincides with the vote on a constitutional accusation against Minister Diego Simpertegui.

Riportato dall'IA

The Chamber of Deputies unanimously approved the admissibility of the constitutional accusation against suspended Supreme Court Justice Diego Simpértegui, with 132 votes in favor. The libel, pushed by ruling-party deputies, is based on three chapters regarding breaches of probity in key judicial cases. The Senate will now decide the case on December 22, potentially removing him from office if approved by a majority.

Dopo il rifiuto della Camera bassa di un capitolo controverso, la Commissione Bilancio del Senato argentino ha approvato il 19 dicembre un dictamen di maggioranza per il Bilancio 2026, omettendo il Capitolo 11 sulla revoca delle leggi di finanziamento universitario e per la disabilità. È fissata una sessione speciale il 26 dicembre, mentre la riforma del lavoro slitta a febbraio.

Riportato dall'IA

In un passo chiave per la riforma elettorale della presidente Claudia Sheinbaum — inizialmente svelata il 25 febbraio e presentata formalmente il 4 marzo come il 'decálogo por la democracia' (vedi copertura precedente) — le commissioni Puntos Constitucionales e Reforma Política-Electoral della Camera dei Deputati hanno approvato la proposta il 10 marzo 2026 con 45 voti contro 39. Procede alla discussione in plenaria, probabilmente l'11 marzo, in mezzo all'opposizione di PVEM e PT nonostante la loro alleanza con Morena.

The Chamber of Deputies approved and dispatched the public sector readjustment bill to the Senate, including a gradual 3.4% salary increase. However, it rejected the controversial 'tie-down norms' pushed by the government, which plans to reintroduce them in the Upper House. Opposition lawmakers criticized the lack of clear funding for part of the fiscal cost.

Riportato dall'IA

Il Senato argentino ha trasformato il nuovo Regime Penale Minorile in legge, abbassando l'età della responsabilità penale a 14 anni, con 44 voti a favore e 27 contro, dopo sette ore di dibattito. Ha anche approvato la riforma del lavoro con 42 voti affermativi e 28 negativi, incorporando modifiche della Camera dei Deputati che hanno rimosso un articolo controverso sulle assenze per malattia. Il partito di governo ha celebrato i progressi, mentre l'opposizione ha criticato le misure come dannose per i lavoratori e i diritti umani.

 

 

 

Questo sito web utilizza i cookie

Utilizziamo i cookie per l'analisi per migliorare il nostro sito. Leggi la nostra politica sulla privacy per ulteriori informazioni.
Rifiuta