Dramatic illustration of California regulators threatening Tesla with sales suspension over misleading Autopilot marketing, featuring official notice and Tesla showroom.
Dramatic illustration of California regulators threatening Tesla with sales suspension over misleading Autopilot marketing, featuring official notice and Tesla showroom.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

California threatens Tesla with sales suspension over autopilot marketing

AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

California regulators are poised to suspend Tesla's vehicle sales license in the state for 30 days unless the company revises its marketing for self-driving features. An administrative law judge ruled that terms like 'Autopilot' and 'Full Self-Driving' mislead consumers about the technology's capabilities, which require constant human supervision. Tesla has 90 days to comply and avoid the penalty.

The California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) adopted a proposed decision by Administrative Law Judge Juliet Cox on December 16, 2025, following five days of hearings in Oakland in July. The judge determined that Tesla has engaged in deceptive practices by promoting 'Autopilot' and 'Full Self-Driving' as autonomous technologies, despite the systems operating at SAE Level 2, necessitating full driver attention at all times.

Cox recommended suspending Tesla's licenses to sell and manufacture vehicles in California for 30 days, but the DMV opted not to impose the manufacturing penalty, focusing instead on the dealer license. Tesla, based in Austin, Texas, but with a major factory in Fremont, California, will have a 90-day period to update its marketing materials to clearly convey the limitations of its driver-assistance features.

'Tesla can take simple steps to pause this decision and permanently resolve this issue – steps autonomous vehicle companies and other automakers have been able to achieve,' said Steve Gordon, director of the California DMV. The action stems from a 2023 complaint against Tesla for misleading advertising, including a 2020 video showing a car driving autonomously that remained on the company's website for nearly four years.

Tesla dismissed the ruling on X, stating: 'This was a “consumer protection” order about the use of the term “Autopilot” in a case where not one single customer came forward to say there’s a problem. Sales in California will continue uninterrupted.' The company has already renamed its advanced package to 'Full Self-Driving (Supervised)' and includes warnings in its owner's manual.

This case highlights ongoing scrutiny of Tesla's self-driving claims, amid federal investigations into crashes involving Autopilot and lawsuits, including a recent Florida jury awarding over $240 million in damages for a fatal 2019 accident. California, Tesla's largest U.S. market, underscores the stakes for the electric vehicle maker facing declining sales and increased competition.

사람들이 말하는 것

Reactions on X to California's DMV ultimatum on Tesla's Autopilot marketing are polarized: Tesla supporters view it as bureaucratic overreach with minimal impact due to the 90-day stay, while critics and skeptics praise it as accountability for misleading claims on self-driving capabilities. High-engagement posts highlight no immediate sales ban and Tesla's confirmation of uninterrupted operations.

관련 기사

Tesla has released promotional videos that depict drivers not supervising its Full Self-Driving system, even as the company faces up to $14.5 billion in related lawsuits. The videos include one posted on May 26 showing a driver making espresso and another on June 9 filmed in Denmark where the system violated traffic laws. These clips contradict Tesla's legal argument that drivers must always supervise the technology.

AI에 의해 보고됨

A Swedish transport authority is urging the European Union to reject Tesla’s Full Self-Driving system unless the company disables its ability to exceed speed limits. The recommendation comes ahead of a key EU committee meeting next month.

이 웹사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다

사이트를 개선하기 위해 분석을 위한 쿠키를 사용합니다. 자세한 내용은 개인정보 보호 정책을 읽으세요.
거부