Dramatic illustration of California regulators threatening Tesla with sales suspension over misleading Autopilot marketing, featuring official notice and Tesla showroom.
Dramatic illustration of California regulators threatening Tesla with sales suspension over misleading Autopilot marketing, featuring official notice and Tesla showroom.
Billede genereret af AI

California threatens Tesla with sales suspension over autopilot marketing

Billede genereret af AI

California regulators are poised to suspend Tesla's vehicle sales license in the state for 30 days unless the company revises its marketing for self-driving features. An administrative law judge ruled that terms like 'Autopilot' and 'Full Self-Driving' mislead consumers about the technology's capabilities, which require constant human supervision. Tesla has 90 days to comply and avoid the penalty.

The California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) adopted a proposed decision by Administrative Law Judge Juliet Cox on December 16, 2025, following five days of hearings in Oakland in July. The judge determined that Tesla has engaged in deceptive practices by promoting 'Autopilot' and 'Full Self-Driving' as autonomous technologies, despite the systems operating at SAE Level 2, necessitating full driver attention at all times.

Cox recommended suspending Tesla's licenses to sell and manufacture vehicles in California for 30 days, but the DMV opted not to impose the manufacturing penalty, focusing instead on the dealer license. Tesla, based in Austin, Texas, but with a major factory in Fremont, California, will have a 90-day period to update its marketing materials to clearly convey the limitations of its driver-assistance features.

'Tesla can take simple steps to pause this decision and permanently resolve this issue – steps autonomous vehicle companies and other automakers have been able to achieve,' said Steve Gordon, director of the California DMV. The action stems from a 2023 complaint against Tesla for misleading advertising, including a 2020 video showing a car driving autonomously that remained on the company's website for nearly four years.

Tesla dismissed the ruling on X, stating: 'This was a “consumer protection” order about the use of the term “Autopilot” in a case where not one single customer came forward to say there’s a problem. Sales in California will continue uninterrupted.' The company has already renamed its advanced package to 'Full Self-Driving (Supervised)' and includes warnings in its owner's manual.

This case highlights ongoing scrutiny of Tesla's self-driving claims, amid federal investigations into crashes involving Autopilot and lawsuits, including a recent Florida jury awarding over $240 million in damages for a fatal 2019 accident. California, Tesla's largest U.S. market, underscores the stakes for the electric vehicle maker facing declining sales and increased competition.

Hvad folk siger

Reactions on X to California's DMV ultimatum on Tesla's Autopilot marketing are polarized: Tesla supporters view it as bureaucratic overreach with minimal impact due to the 90-day stay, while critics and skeptics praise it as accountability for misleading claims on self-driving capabilities. High-engagement posts highlight no immediate sales ban and Tesla's confirmation of uninterrupted operations.

Relaterede artikler

Illustration depicting Tesla car outside California DMV with ultimatum notice to rename Autopilot or face sales suspension.
Billede genereret af AI

Update: California DMV formally adopts ruling requiring Tesla to rename Autopilot amid sales suspension threat

Rapporteret af AI Billede genereret af AI

Following yesterday's initial reports, the California DMV on December 17 officially adopted Judge Juliet E. Cox's decision, giving Tesla 60 days to revise 'Autopilot' and 'Full Self-Driving Capability' branding or face a 30-day sales license suspension. Manufacturing remains unaffected under a permanent stay.

Tesla has ceased using the term 'Autopilot' in its California vehicle marketing and rebranded driver assistance features, complying with a California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) order and avoiding a 30-day suspension of its dealer license. The changes stem from a years-long dispute over misleading names for its Level 2 systems, which require constant human supervision. DMV Director Steve Gordon commended Tesla for protecting consumers.

Rapporteret af AI

Tesla filed a lawsuit on February 13, 2026, against the California Department of Motor Vehicles, challenging a December 2025 ruling that accused the company of misleading consumers through marketing of its Autopilot and Full Self-Driving features. Despite complying with required changes to avoid a sales license suspension, Tesla argues the decision was factually erroneous, legally flawed, and lacked evidence of consumer harm. The dispute underscores intense scrutiny of Tesla's driver-assistance systems amid its major California operations.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has launched a probe into Tesla's Full Self-Driving feature following reports of vehicles running red lights and entering oncoming lanes. The investigation covers nearly 2.9 million vehicles and stems from dozens of incidents, including crashes and injuries. Regulators are examining whether the system provides adequate warnings to drivers.

Rapporteret af AI

A driver in Houston has filed a lawsuit against Tesla following an incident where her Cybertruck allegedly attempted to drive off an overpass while using the autopilot feature. The suit claims that Tesla's self-driving technology is defectively designed and misleadingly marketed as fully autonomous. The event occurred last year.

Israel's Ministry of Transport has approved Tesla to conduct trials of its supervised autonomous driving system on public roads. The initiative focuses on integrating the technology into local conditions while prioritizing safety. This step aims to position Israel as a hub for smart vehicle innovation.

Rapporteret af AI

Tesla has started test drives for its Robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, labeling them as unsupervised. However, reports indicate that human monitors are still involved, following the vehicles from trailing cars. Critics argue this setup introduces new safety risks by potentially overburdening remote supervisors.

 

 

 

Dette websted bruger cookies

Vi bruger cookies til analyse for at forbedre vores side. Læs vores privatlivspolitik for mere information.
Afvis