Trump administration fast-tracks logging in Illinois national forest

The U.S. Forest Service approved a commercial logging sale in southern Illinois' Shawnee National Forest, using a categorical exclusion to limit public input and bypass full environmental reviews. Local environmentalists, led by activist Sam Stearns, sued the agency, alleging violations of federal law amid broader efforts by the Trump administration to accelerate timber harvests. A federal judge temporarily halted the project, but logging partially proceeded as the case remains pending.

In late 2024, the Forest Service greenlit the sale of nearly 70 acres of timber in the Shawnee National Forest, Illinois' sole national forest and one of the nation's smallest. Initially presented as the McCormick Oak-Hickory Restoration Project—a thinning effort to promote younger trees—the operation raised alarms over potential habitat loss for species like endangered bats and impacts to nearby natural landmarks.

Sam Stearns, a 71-year-old founder of the preservation group Friends of Bell Smith Spring, criticized the plan sharply. "Never in the history of this planet has a forest been logged back to health," he said. Stearns and fellow advocates searched for public comment opportunities but missed the three-week window because the project was advertised under the obscure name "V-Plow." Previously, such periods extended up to 45 days. No bids came in initially, but the contract went to a Kentucky buyer in June 2025.

The following month, Stearns and others filed a lawsuit against the Forest Service, claiming breaches of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which requires assessment of environmental effects. A federal judge issued a temporary block in early fall before permitting logging to resume; the suit continues, with the agency declining comment due to litigation.

This dispute reflects wider tensions under President Donald Trump's directives to expedite timber production on public lands. An executive order urged the Forest Service to apply "categorical exclusions"—NEPA shortcuts for low-impact activities—to more projects, including adopting exclusions from other agencies like those for wastewater or transmission lines, and creating new ones for wildfire-related thinning. Garrett Rose, a senior attorney with the Natural Resources Defense Council, noted that while such exclusions suit minor tasks like trail maintenance, the administration has expanded them aggressively, reducing transparency.

Similar tactics appear elsewhere: the Forest Service invoked Tennessee Valley Authority exclusions for logging in Oregon's Mount Hood and Alaska's Tongass national forests. Ryan Talbott of Wildearth Guardians linked these to Trump's timber order, saying agencies seek every avenue to speed production. In contrast, a September federal ruling halted a larger logging plan in Indiana's Hoosier National Forest for NEPA shortcomings.

By late August 2025, a Kentucky crew had harvested about half the Shawnee site before pausing in early September due to the lawsuit. As of late November, work remained unfinished. Observing the scarred hillsides, Stearns remarked, "Even if they were getting a premium price for this wood, which I know they’re not, those trees would be much more valuable standing, contributing to the health of an ecosystem, than they’ll ever be cut like that."

Verwandte Artikel

Federal judge in San Francisco courtroom blocking Trump administration layoffs during government shutdown, with legal documents and affected workers.
Bild generiert von KI

Federal judge indefinitely blocks Trump administration layoffs during shutdown

Von KI berichtet Bild generiert von KI Fakten geprüft

A federal judge in San Francisco has indefinitely barred the Trump administration from carrying out mass reductions-in-force during the ongoing government shutdown, extending an earlier pause and affecting thousands of layoff notices issued since October 1.

After the Trump administration terminated over $1.6 billion in EPA grants for environmental justice projects in early 2025, affected communities across the US have faced setbacks in addressing pollution and health risks. In places like East St. Louis, Illinois, planned air quality monitoring efforts were halted midway, leaving residents without vital data on local hazards. Groups are now seeking alternative funding or pursuing legal action amid tighter resources.

Von KI berichtet

The Kenya Forest Service has demolished a two-roomed iron sheet structure built illegally inside Makutani Forest in Baringo County, as part of efforts to curb encroachments on public forest land. The operation took place on Saturday, January 3, 2026, and is seen as a measure to prevent attempts to seize the gazetted forest. KFS has refuted claims that the structure was an operational school for the local community.

Vier Tage nach dem 9-1-Urteil des Supremo Tribunal Federal, das den zeitlichen Rahmen für verfassungswidrig erklärte, kritisierte ein Bundesabgeordneter von PL-MS und Präsident der Landwirtschaftskommission der Abgeordnetenkammer das Urteil dafür, die verfassungsmäßige Absicht zu missachten und Unsicherheit für Produzenten im ländlichen Raum mit gutgläubigen Titeln zu schaffen. Der Kongress hatte ein Gesetz und einen Verfassungsnovellierungsantrag zugunsten des Rahmens verabschiedet.

Von KI berichtet

Das äthiopische Abgeordnetenhaus des Volkes hat einstimmig ein aktualisiertes Proklamationsgesetz zum Schutz und zur Entwicklung von Wäldern nach 55 Jahren genehmigt. Das neue Gesetz, Nummer 1400/2018, zielt darauf ab, die Wald-Biodiversität zu schützen und moderne Management-Systeme einzuführen. Es ersetzt ein veraltetes Rahmenwerk von vor Jahrzehnten.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration cannot deploy National Guard troops to Chicago to address violence during federal immigration raids. The 6-3 decision came after pushback from Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, who argued that local forces were sufficient. The ruling focuses on the lack of federal authority to use military in the state.

Von KI berichtet Fakten geprüft

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on December 8, 2025, in Trump v. Slaughter, a case examining whether President Donald Trump may remove Federal Trade Commission member Rebecca Kelly Slaughter without cause. The justices’ questions suggested a sharp divide over limits on presidential power and the future of a 90‑year‑old precedent that has helped insulate independent agencies from at‑will firings.

 

 

 

Diese Website verwendet Cookies

Wir verwenden Cookies für Analysen, um unsere Website zu verbessern. Lesen Sie unsere Datenschutzrichtlinie für weitere Informationen.
Ablehnen