Amazon se enfrenta a una demanda colectiva por el reembolso de aranceles

Una demanda colectiva presentada en Seattle acusa a Amazon de retener cientos de millones de dólares procedentes de aranceles ilegales en lugar de reembolsarlos a sus clientes. La demanda se produce tras una sentencia del Tribunal Supremo en contra de la política arancelaria.

La demanda fue presentada el viernes en Seattle. Alega que Amazon obtuvo beneficios de los costes arancelarios repercutidos a los consumidores y que no tiene intención de devolver el dinero, a pesar de tener derecho legal a recuperar los reembolsos del gobierno tras la decisión del Tribunal Supremo.

Artículos relacionados

Realistic courtroom scene depicting gamers suing Nintendo over tariff refund profits.
Imagen generada por IA

Gamers file class action lawsuit against Nintendo for tariff refunds

Reportado por IA Imagen generada por IA

Two Nintendo customers have filed a class action lawsuit against the company, seeking refunds for higher prices paid due to now-invalidated tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump. The suit, filed on April 21 in the United States District Court’s Western District of Washington, argues that Nintendo passed tariff costs to consumers while pursuing government refunds. As first reported by Aftermath, the plaintiffs aim to prevent Nintendo from profiting twice from the same payments.

The US Supreme Court has declared tariffs imposed on coffee imports by the Trump administration unconstitutional, potentially paving the way for refunds to affected roasters and importers. While the industry welcomes the decision for offering cost relief, questions remain over the process and timeline for reimbursements. The ruling highlights ongoing trade tensions that reshaped global coffee dynamics last year.

Reportado por IA

US firms scrambled on Monday to file claims for refunds on tariffs paid for Chinese imports, deemed illegally collected by the government. Companies like New Jersey-based food packaging importer Lanca Sales are navigating the new system through customs brokers, amid fresh confusion and administrative burdens.

In a 6-3 decision, the US Supreme Court has struck down President Donald Trump's sweeping global tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, citing lack of congressional authorization. The ruling triggered a relief rally in financial markets, including a brief spike in Bitcoin to $68,000, though gains faded amid ongoing uncertainties. President Trump responded by announcing a new 10% global tariff under Section 122.

Reportado por IA

Following the Supreme Court's rejection of his emergency tariff powers and Trump's subsequent 15% global tariff announcement, Democrats are framing the policy as a midterm vulnerability on affordability, while Republicans tout economic benefits amid new data showing sluggish growth.

The US Supreme Court annulled most tariffs imposed by Donald Trump under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) on Friday, in a 6-3 decision limiting its use for trade duties. Hours later, Trump signed an executive order for a 10% global tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, exempting T-MEC products. The measure takes effect on February 24.

Reportado por IA

A proposed class action lawsuit accuses Roku and TCL of releasing faulty software updates that rendered televisions inoperable. Plaintiff Terri Else claims her TCL Roku TVs stopped working after updates, with the companies failing to fix the issues. Roku dismissed the claims as meritless.

 

 

 

Este sitio web utiliza cookies

Utilizamos cookies para análisis con el fin de mejorar nuestro sitio. Lee nuestra política de privacidad para más información.
Rechazar