Dramatic courtroom scene of U.S. Second Circuit reinstating $655.5M judgment against PLO/PA for American terror victims.
Dramatic courtroom scene of U.S. Second Circuit reinstating $655.5M judgment against PLO/PA for American terror victims.
Larawang ginawa ng AI

Second Circuit reinstates $655.5 million Anti-Terrorism Act judgment against PLO and Palestinian Authority

Larawang ginawa ng AI
Fact checked

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has reinstated a $655.5 million judgment entered on a 2015 jury verdict against the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority in a long-running case brought by American victims of attacks in Israel during the Second Intifada.

A federal jury in Manhattan in 2015 found the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the Palestinian Authority (PA) liable under the federal Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) for six attacks in Israel that killed or wounded U.S. citizens. The jury awarded $218.5 million, which was automatically trebled under the ATA to $655.5 million.

In August 2016, a three-judge panel of the Second Circuit vacated the judgment, holding that U.S. courts lacked personal jurisdiction over the PLO and PA.

Congress later enacted the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act (PSJVTA) in December 2019. The statute names the PLO and PA and provides that they “shall be deemed to have consented” to personal jurisdiction in certain ATA suits if they engage in specified conduct, including making payments to individuals imprisoned for terrorist acts or to families of deceased terrorists.

The Second Circuit subsequently concluded that the PSJVTA’s “deemed consent” provisions could not constitutionally supply personal jurisdiction over the PLO and PA. But in June 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously reversed in Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization, upholding the PSJVTA’s personal-jurisdiction framework as consistent with the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause and emphasizing that the statute ties jurisdiction to conduct involving the United States and to foreign-policy and national-security considerations traditionally left to the political branches.

In its latest ruling, the Second Circuit reinstated the $655.5 million judgment and rejected the defendants’ request for a new trial. The court said the district court did not commit a reversible error in admitting expert testimony about the organizations’ structure and operations, and it emphasized the interest in finality after decades of litigation. The panel also noted that some plaintiffs have since died or are in poor health, a factor it said weighed against reopening the trial.

The decision leaves in place the 2015 verdict holding the PLO and PA civilly liable to American victims for the attacks at issue in the case.

Ano ang sinasabi ng mga tao

X discussions largely celebrate the Second Circuit's reinstatement of the $655.5 million judgment as a major win for American victims of PLO/PA-supported terror attacks during the Second Intifada. Pro-Israel accounts emphasize accountability via 'pay-for-slay' policies and congressional laws after years of battles. Some users express skepticism about enforcement and collection feasibility.

Mga Kaugnay na Artikulo

Illustration of a federal judge approving the Alavi Foundation settlement involving 650 Fifth Avenue, with courtroom documents and Manhattan skyline view.
Larawang ginawa ng AI

Court approved Alavi Foundation settlement over 650 Fifth Avenue stake; key terms later detailed in New York charity filing

Iniulat ng AI Larawang ginawa ng AI Fact checked

A federal court approved a settlement on January 17, 2025, resolving long-running U.S. litigation involving the Alavi Foundation and interests in the Manhattan office tower at 650 Fifth Avenue. The settlement’s main terms—including transferring Alavi’s assets to a newly created charity and providing $318 million in payments or releases to the U.S. government and terrorism judgment creditors—were later described in a filing with New York’s charities regulator and reported by Jewish Insider.

Tacloban City Regional Trial Court Branch 45 has denied appeals by activists Frenchie Mae Cumpio and Marielle Domequil against their terrorism financing conviction and bail plea. Groups including NUJP and KAPATID condemned the ruling as a dangerous precedent. Their legal counsel plans to pursue remedies to reverse it.

Iniulat ng AI

Five people linked to the French associations Humani’Terre and Soutien Humani’Terre were indicted on February 20 for financing a terrorist enterprise. Intelligence services consider them close to the Muslim Brotherhood. The judiciary suspects funds were sent to Hamas under the guise of humanitarian aid.

Two Pennsylvania teenagers have been charged with federal terrorism offenses after throwing homemade explosive devices inspired by ISIS during an anti-Islam protest outside New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani's Gracie Mansion residence on March 8, 2026. The FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Force is probing the planned attack, which involved undetonated IEDs containing TATP packed with shrapnel; a third suspicious device was later found nearby.

Iniulat ng AI

One week after South Korea's judicial reform laws took effect on March 12—introducing constitutional appeals and penalties for 'law distortion'—complaints against top judges have risen sharply. The National Assembly is set to vote Thursday on the remaining two bills of the 'judiciary trio,' prompting fears of paralyzing the judiciary.

Gumagamit ng cookies ang website na ito

Gumagamit kami ng cookies para sa analytics upang mapabuti ang aming site. Basahin ang aming patakaran sa privacy para sa higit pang impormasyon.
Tanggihan