Dramatic courtroom scene of U.S. Second Circuit reinstating $655.5M judgment against PLO/PA for American terror victims.
Dramatic courtroom scene of U.S. Second Circuit reinstating $655.5M judgment against PLO/PA for American terror victims.
Bild generiert von KI

Second Circuit reinstates $655.5 million Anti-Terrorism Act judgment against PLO and Palestinian Authority

Bild generiert von KI
Fakten geprüft

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has reinstated a $655.5 million judgment entered on a 2015 jury verdict against the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority in a long-running case brought by American victims of attacks in Israel during the Second Intifada.

A federal jury in Manhattan in 2015 found the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the Palestinian Authority (PA) liable under the federal Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) for six attacks in Israel that killed or wounded U.S. citizens. The jury awarded $218.5 million, which was automatically trebled under the ATA to $655.5 million.

In August 2016, a three-judge panel of the Second Circuit vacated the judgment, holding that U.S. courts lacked personal jurisdiction over the PLO and PA.

Congress later enacted the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act (PSJVTA) in December 2019. The statute names the PLO and PA and provides that they “shall be deemed to have consented” to personal jurisdiction in certain ATA suits if they engage in specified conduct, including making payments to individuals imprisoned for terrorist acts or to families of deceased terrorists.

The Second Circuit subsequently concluded that the PSJVTA’s “deemed consent” provisions could not constitutionally supply personal jurisdiction over the PLO and PA. But in June 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously reversed in Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization, upholding the PSJVTA’s personal-jurisdiction framework as consistent with the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause and emphasizing that the statute ties jurisdiction to conduct involving the United States and to foreign-policy and national-security considerations traditionally left to the political branches.

In its latest ruling, the Second Circuit reinstated the $655.5 million judgment and rejected the defendants’ request for a new trial. The court said the district court did not commit a reversible error in admitting expert testimony about the organizations’ structure and operations, and it emphasized the interest in finality after decades of litigation. The panel also noted that some plaintiffs have since died or are in poor health, a factor it said weighed against reopening the trial.

The decision leaves in place the 2015 verdict holding the PLO and PA civilly liable to American victims for the attacks at issue in the case.

Was die Leute sagen

X discussions largely celebrate the Second Circuit's reinstatement of the $655.5 million judgment as a major win for American victims of PLO/PA-supported terror attacks during the Second Intifada. Pro-Israel accounts emphasize accountability via 'pay-for-slay' policies and congressional laws after years of battles. Some users express skepticism about enforcement and collection feasibility.

Verwandte Artikel

DHS agents rearresting Columbia University pro-Palestinian protest organizer Mahmoud Khalil outside a federal courthouse amid deportation proceedings to Algeria.
Bild generiert von KI

DHS says it plans to rearrest Columbia protest organizer Mahmoud Khalil and pursue deportation to Algeria after appeals court ruling

Von KI berichtet Bild generiert von KI Fakten geprüft

The Department of Homeland Security says it is preparing to rearrest Mahmoud Khalil, a U.S. lawful permanent resident who helped organize pro-Palestinian demonstrations linked to Columbia University, and move forward with deportation proceedings that could send him to Algeria. The announcement came after a federal appeals court said a New Jersey judge lacked jurisdiction over an order that had led to his release from immigration detention.

Tacloban City Regional Trial Court Branch 45 has denied appeals by activists Frenchie Mae Cumpio and Marielle Domequil against their terrorism financing conviction and bail plea. Groups including NUJP and KAPATID condemned the ruling as a dangerous precedent. Their legal counsel plans to pursue remedies to reverse it.

Von KI berichtet

Fünf Personen, die mit den französischen Vereinen Humani’Terre und Soutien Humani’Terre verbunden sind, wurden am 20. Februar wegen Finanzierung eines terroristischen Unternehmens angeklagt. Die Nachrichtendienste halten sie für nahestehend zur Muslimbruderschaft. Die Justiz vermutet, dass Gelder unter dem Deckmantel humanitärer Hilfe an die Hamas geflossen sind.

A federal judge in Fort Worth declared a mistrial Tuesday during jury selection in the case against nine defendants charged in connection with a July 4, 2025, attack outside the Prairieland Detention Center in Alvarado, Texas, after raising concerns that a defense attorney’s clothing could be seen as political messaging to prospective jurors.

Von KI berichtet

South Korea's National Assembly passed a Democratic Party bill on Tuesday establishing dedicated trial panels at Seoul courts for criminal cases of insurrection, foreign aggression, and rebellion. Introduced two days earlier and surviving an opposition filibuster, the legislation raises ongoing concerns about judicial independence and sets a potential precedent for case-specific judicial changes.

Der Prozess wegen mutmaßlicher Korruption bei der Vergabe des Schulernährungsprogramms (PAE) von Neiva 2020 schreitet mit einem neuen Gerichtszeitplan voran, geleitet von Richterin Olga María Erazo. Der ehemalige Bürgermeister Gorky Muñoz Calderón, nun Senatskandidat, steht neben Ex-Beamten und Auftragnehmern vor Gericht. Die Vorbereitungshörung soll die Beweiserhebung abschließen, um den mündlichen Prozess im März zu beginnen.

Von KI berichtet

Aida Seif al-Dawla, Mitbegründerin des Al-Nadeem-Zentrums zur Rehabilitation von Gewaltopfern, wurde am Sonntag auf freien Fuß gesetzt, nachdem die Staatsanwaltschaft für Staatssicherheit sie wegen Vorwürfen der „Verbreitung falscher Nachrichten mit dem Ziel, die öffentliche Sicherheit und Ordnung zu stören“ vernommen hatte, so Anwalt Haytham Mohamadeen. Die Kaution belief sich auf 100.000 LE. Menschenrechtsorganisationen bezeichneten die Vorladung als Teil einer systematischen Eskalation gegen Rechteaktivisten, Politiker und Journalisten.

 

 

 

Diese Website verwendet Cookies

Wir verwenden Cookies für Analysen, um unsere Website zu verbessern. Lesen Sie unsere Datenschutzrichtlinie für weitere Informationen.
Ablehnen