Dramatic courtroom scene of U.S. Second Circuit reinstating $655.5M judgment against PLO/PA for American terror victims.
Dramatic courtroom scene of U.S. Second Circuit reinstating $655.5M judgment against PLO/PA for American terror victims.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Second Circuit reinstates $655.5 million Anti-Terrorism Act judgment against PLO and Palestinian Authority

AI에 의해 생성된 이미지
사실 확인됨

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has reinstated a $655.5 million judgment entered on a 2015 jury verdict against the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority in a long-running case brought by American victims of attacks in Israel during the Second Intifada.

A federal jury in Manhattan in 2015 found the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the Palestinian Authority (PA) liable under the federal Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) for six attacks in Israel that killed or wounded U.S. citizens. The jury awarded $218.5 million, which was automatically trebled under the ATA to $655.5 million.

In August 2016, a three-judge panel of the Second Circuit vacated the judgment, holding that U.S. courts lacked personal jurisdiction over the PLO and PA.

Congress later enacted the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act (PSJVTA) in December 2019. The statute names the PLO and PA and provides that they “shall be deemed to have consented” to personal jurisdiction in certain ATA suits if they engage in specified conduct, including making payments to individuals imprisoned for terrorist acts or to families of deceased terrorists.

The Second Circuit subsequently concluded that the PSJVTA’s “deemed consent” provisions could not constitutionally supply personal jurisdiction over the PLO and PA. But in June 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously reversed in Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization, upholding the PSJVTA’s personal-jurisdiction framework as consistent with the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause and emphasizing that the statute ties jurisdiction to conduct involving the United States and to foreign-policy and national-security considerations traditionally left to the political branches.

In its latest ruling, the Second Circuit reinstated the $655.5 million judgment and rejected the defendants’ request for a new trial. The court said the district court did not commit a reversible error in admitting expert testimony about the organizations’ structure and operations, and it emphasized the interest in finality after decades of litigation. The panel also noted that some plaintiffs have since died or are in poor health, a factor it said weighed against reopening the trial.

The decision leaves in place the 2015 verdict holding the PLO and PA civilly liable to American victims for the attacks at issue in the case.

사람들이 말하는 것

X discussions largely celebrate the Second Circuit's reinstatement of the $655.5 million judgment as a major win for American victims of PLO/PA-supported terror attacks during the Second Intifada. Pro-Israel accounts emphasize accountability via 'pay-for-slay' policies and congressional laws after years of battles. Some users express skepticism about enforcement and collection feasibility.

관련 기사

Illustration of a federal judge approving the Alavi Foundation settlement involving 650 Fifth Avenue, with courtroom documents and Manhattan skyline view.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Court approved Alavi Foundation settlement over 650 Fifth Avenue stake; key terms later detailed in New York charity filing

AI에 의해 보고됨 AI에 의해 생성된 이미지 사실 확인됨

A federal court approved a settlement on January 17, 2025, resolving long-running U.S. litigation involving the Alavi Foundation and interests in the Manhattan office tower at 650 Fifth Avenue. The settlement’s main terms—including transferring Alavi’s assets to a newly created charity and providing $318 million in payments or releases to the U.S. government and terrorism judgment creditors—were later described in a filing with New York’s charities regulator and reported by Jewish Insider.

타클로반시 제45지방법원은 활동가 프렌치 메 쿰피오와 마리엘 도메킬이 제기한 테러 자금 조달 혐의 유죄 판결에 대한 재심 청구와 보석 신청을 기각했다. 필리핀 기자협회(NUJP)와 KAPATID 등 단체들은 이번 판결이 위험한 선례를 남겼다고 비판했으며, 변호인단은 판결 뒤집기를 위한 법적 대응을 예고했다.

AI에 의해 보고됨

Five people linked to the French associations Humani’Terre and Soutien Humani’Terre were indicted on February 20 for financing a terrorist enterprise. Intelligence services consider them close to the Muslim Brotherhood. The judiciary suspects funds were sent to Hamas under the guise of humanitarian aid.

Two Pennsylvania teenagers have been charged with federal terrorism offenses after throwing homemade explosive devices inspired by ISIS during an anti-Islam protest outside New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani's Gracie Mansion residence on March 8, 2026. The FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Force is probing the planned attack, which involved undetonated IEDs containing TATP packed with shrapnel; a third suspicious device was later found nearby.

AI에 의해 보고됨

민주당 주도의 사법개혁 3법 중 법률왜곡죄가 3월12일 시행된 직후 대법원장과 현직 판사에 대한 고발이 잇따랐다. 나머지 두 법안은 3월20일 국회 본회의 표결을 앞두고 있다. 비판론자들은 사법 시스템 마비를 우려하고 있다.

이 웹사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다

사이트를 개선하기 위해 분석을 위한 쿠키를 사용합니다. 자세한 내용은 개인정보 보호 정책을 읽으세요.
거부