Virginia Supreme Court justices striking down redistricting maps as Democratic politicians react and discuss options in a formal courtroom setting.
Virginia Supreme Court justices striking down redistricting maps as Democratic politicians react and discuss options in a formal courtroom setting.
Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

Demokrat Virginia mempertimbangkan opsi setelah pengadilan membatalkan peta redistricting

Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

Mahkamah Agung Virginia membatalkan peta kongres baru pada hari Jumat yang sebelumnya telah disetujui oleh para pemilih pada bulan April. Partai Demokrat kini tengah mempertimbangkan langkah tanggapan, termasuk rencana radikal untuk mengganti seluruh jajaran hakim pengadilan, meskipun para pemimpin partai tampaknya tidak mungkin menempuh langkah tersebut dalam waktu dekat.

Dalam putusan 4-3, pengadilan tinggi negara bagian tersebut memutuskan bahwa Partai Demokrat melanggar prosedur dalam menempatkan referendum tersebut pada surat suara. Peta tersebut sebelumnya diperkirakan akan mengubah delegasi DPR AS dari Virginia yang semula unggul 6-5 bagi Demokrat menjadi keunggulan 10-1. Para pemilih menyetujui perubahan tersebut dengan selisih suara tipis setelah kelompok-kelompok yang berafiliasi dengan Demokrat menghabiskan lebih dari $64 juta untuk upaya tersebut. Putusan ini membuat batas wilayah negara bagian tetap menggunakan aturan sebelumnya.

Apa yang dikatakan orang

Para pengguna X sebagian besar mengkritik rencana potensial Partai Demokrat Virginia untuk mengganti Mahkamah Agung sebagai perebutan kekuasaan yang munafik setelah putusan redistricting tersebut, dengan sebagian pihak memandangnya sebagai serangan terhadap demokrasi sementara yang lain menyebutnya sebagai respons putus asa atas upaya gerrymandering yang terhambat.

Artikel Terkait

Illustration of Virginia Supreme Court nullifying Democratic redistricting plan with 4-3 ruling
Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

Virginia supreme court nullifies democratic redistricting plan

Dilaporkan oleh AI Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

The Virginia Supreme Court on Friday struck down a voter-approved redistricting plan that Democrats hoped would add four House seats. The 4-3 ruling cited a procedural error in how the measure reached the ballot. The decision comes amid a broader wave of Republican-led map changes in Southern states.

The Supreme Court of Virginia ruled Friday that a voter-approved redistricting plan violated state constitutional procedures. The 4-3 decision nullifies the April referendum and keeps the state's existing congressional maps in place. Democrats had sought the change to gain a stronger edge ahead of the 2026 midterms.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

The Virginia Supreme Court has ruled that a newly drawn congressional map favored by Democrats is unconstitutional, overturning the results of a special election and leaving the state with its previous boundaries.

Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger has announced support for a ballot amendment that would allow temporary changes to the state's redistricting process in response to actions in other states. The move has drawn criticism from Republicans who point to her past opposition to gerrymandering. Voters will decide on the measure in April.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

Tennessee Republicans voted Thursday to pass new congressional maps expected to eliminate the state's only Democratic U.S. House seat. Republican Governor Bill Lee signed the measure into law shortly afterward. The move followed a Supreme Court decision striking down certain majority-black districts as unconstitutional racial gerrymandering.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on April 29 that Louisiana's congressional map, which included a second majority-Black district, constitutes an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the majority that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act requires proof of intentional discrimination, not just disparate impact. The decision, in Louisiana v. Callais, limits race-based redistricting and prompts new maps in several states.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

In response to the Supreme Court's Callais v. Louisiana decision curtailing Voting Rights Act protections (as covered in this series), Alabama lawmakers have begun a special session to reinstate 2023 congressional maps if courts lift a prior ban. Critics say the move would undermine Black representation.

Situs web ini menggunakan cookie

Kami menggunakan cookie untuk analisis guna meningkatkan situs kami. Baca kebijakan privasi kami untuk informasi lebih lanjut.
Tolak