Virginia Democrats appealing to the Supreme Court over a gerrymandering ruling, with lawyers holding district maps in front of the court building
Virginia Democrats appealing to the Supreme Court over a gerrymandering ruling, with lawyers holding district maps in front of the court building
Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

Demokrat Virginia ajukan banding ke Mahkamah Agung atas putusan gerrymandering

Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

Partai Demokrat Virginia mengajukan gugatan ke Mahkamah Agung AS pada hari Senin untuk membatalkan keputusan pengadilan negara bagian yang membatalkan peta daerah pemilihan kongres yang disetujui pemilih. Langkah ini diambil setelah putusan Mahkamah Agung AS dalam kasus Louisiana v. Callais yang secara efektif melemahkan Undang-Undang Hak Pilih, yang mendorong beberapa negara bagian di Selatan untuk menyusun ulang daerah pemilihan.

Mahkamah Agung negara bagian memutuskan dengan suara 4-3 bahwa badan legislatif Virginia gagal mengikuti prosedur yang tepat saat mengamandemen konstitusi untuk membuat peta baru, meskipun peta tersebut telah disetujui dalam referendum pemilih. Partai Demokrat berargumen bahwa pengadilan negara bagian telah melampaui wewenangnya dan bahwa badan legislatiflah yang memegang keputusan akhir terkait aturan pemilihan umum. Mereka juga mengusulkan untuk menurunkan usia pensiun wajib bagi hakim negara bagian dari 75 tahun menjadi 54 tahun guna merombak komposisi pengadilan sebelum pemilu paruh waktu.

Apa yang dikatakan orang

Reaksi awal di X menunjukkan para pengguna konservatif mengkritik Partai Demokrat Virginia karena melakukan gerrymandering dan mengajukan banding atas putusan tersebut, sementara The Nation menyoroti kesalahan strategis dalam upaya hak pilih. Akun-akun berita melaporkan banding ke Mahkamah Agung AS secara faktual, dengan mencatat pertanyaan-pertanyaan prosedural. Suara-suara skeptis menyebut langkah ini sebagai upaya sia-sia tanpa dasar hukum federal yang kuat.

Artikel Terkait

Virginia Supreme Court justices striking down redistricting maps as Democratic politicians react and discuss options in a formal courtroom setting.
Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

Virginia Democrats weigh options after court voids redistricting maps

Dilaporkan oleh AI Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

The Virginia Supreme Court struck down new congressional maps on Friday that voters had approved in April. Democrats are now considering responses, including a radical plan to replace the entire court, though leaders appear unlikely to pursue it immediately.

The Virginia Supreme Court on Friday struck down a voter-approved redistricting plan that Democrats hoped would add four House seats. The 4-3 ruling cited a procedural error in how the measure reached the ballot. The decision comes amid a broader wave of Republican-led map changes in Southern states.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

The Supreme Court of Virginia ruled Friday that a voter-approved redistricting plan violated state constitutional procedures. The 4-3 decision nullifies the April referendum and keeps the state's existing congressional maps in place. Democrats had sought the change to gain a stronger edge ahead of the 2026 midterms.

The U.S. Supreme Court last week issued a ruling in Louisiana v. Callais that dismantled key elements of the Voting Rights Act. The decision has prompted swift redistricting efforts in multiple states. Revelations about the lead plaintiff have also surfaced.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on April 29 that Louisiana's congressional map, which included a second majority-Black district, constitutes an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the majority that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act requires proof of intentional discrimination, not just disparate impact. The decision, in Louisiana v. Callais, limits race-based redistricting and prompts new maps in several states.

In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's April 29 ruling in Callais v. Louisiana—which struck down a second majority-Black congressional district as racial gerrymandering—civil rights advocates in the Deep South have condemned the decision as a threat to Black representation. States including Alabama, Tennessee, and Louisiana are redrawing maps, prompting vows of lawsuits and midterm mobilization.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a series of recent orders allowing Louisiana and Alabama to redraw congressional maps that eliminate Black opportunity districts. The rulings came in the Louisiana v. Callais case and related Alabama litigation. They mark a sharp shift in the court's approach to voting rights enforcement under the Voting Rights Act.

 

 

 

Situs web ini menggunakan cookie

Kami menggunakan cookie untuk analisis guna meningkatkan situs kami. Baca kebijakan privasi kami untuk informasi lebih lanjut.
Tolak