Putusan Callais mengancam kursi anggota Kongres kulit hitam di seluruh wilayah Selatan

Menyusul keputusan Mahkamah Agung AS pada 29 April 2026 dalam perkara Callais v. Louisiana yang membatalkan peta kongres Louisiana karena dianggap sebagai gerrymandering rasial (sebagaimana dibahas dalam seri ini), para ahli memperingatkan bahwa penafsiran ulang atas perlindungan Undang-Undang Hak Pilih dapat membahayakan keterwakilan kelompok minoritas di seluruh negeri. Louisiana telah memperpanjang penangguhan pemilihan pendahuluan DPR AS setidaknya hingga Juli 2026 di tengah ekspektasi adanya penggambaran ulang peta wilayah.

Legislatur yang dikuasai oleh Partai Republik diperkirakan akan menggambar ulang peta tersebut, yang kemungkinan besar akan menghapus setidaknya satu kursi yang dipegang Partai Demokrat yang terkait dengan distrik dengan mayoritas pemilih kulit hitam. Per 5 Mei 2026, jadwal untuk melanjutkan pemilihan DPR masih belum pasti. Mantan Jaksa Agung AS Eric Holder, ketua National Democratic Redistricting Committee (NDRC), menyoroti risiko terhadap 12 hingga 19 kursi kongres di zona peluang mayoritas minoritas di wilayah Selatan, serta keterwakilan di tingkat negara bagian dan lokal. 'Amandemen ke-14 masih melarang diskriminasi rasial dalam pemungutan suara. Kami akan melihat ke pengadilan negara bagian. Kami telah mengajukan gugatan terhadap apa yang coba dilakukan Louisiana di pengadilan negara bagian Louisiana,' ujar Holder dalam sebuah wawancara NPR. 'Kami akan melakukan apa pun yang kami bisa.' Saat Partai Republik mendorong redistricting di berbagai negara bagian, Partai Demokrat melalui NDRC melakukan perlawanan secara agresif. Holder menyatakan optimisme: 'Ini akan menjadi beberapa tahun yang sulit. Namun, saya sebenarnya yakin bahwa masyarakat Amerika yang tergerak dan fokus dapat memperbaiki sistem ini.' Ia mendesak Kongres untuk melarang praktik gerrymandering partisan dan rasial.

Artikel Terkait

Illustration of Supreme Court ruling against Louisiana redistricting map
Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

Supreme Court strikes down Louisiana congressional map, tightening limits on race-conscious redistricting

Dilaporkan oleh AI Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI Fakta terverifikasi

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6–3 on April 29, 2026, in Louisiana v. Callais that Louisiana’s congressional map (SB8) was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, concluding the Voting Rights Act did not require the state to draw an additional majority-Black district. Sen. Raphael Warnock, D-Ga., called the ruling “a massive and devastating blow,” warning it could accelerate redistricting fights across Southern states ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's April 29, 2026, decision in Louisiana v. Callais declaring the state's congressional map an unconstitutional racial gerrymander (as covered previously in this series), Louisiana has suspended its upcoming primaries for U.S. House races. The ruling affects one of the state's two Democratic-held majority-Black districts. Other primaries, including U.S. Senate, proceed May 16.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry (R) postponed the state's U.S. House primaries until at least mid-July via emergency executive order following the Supreme Court's April 29, 2026, ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, which struck down the congressional map as unconstitutional under the Voting Rights Act. The move, praised by President Trump and Speaker Mike Johnson but challenged by a lawsuit, has caused voter confusion amid ongoing early voting for other races, as Republicans eye redistricting gains.

The U.S. Supreme Court last week issued a ruling in Louisiana v. Callais that dismantled key elements of the Voting Rights Act. The decision has prompted swift redistricting efforts in multiple states. Revelations about the lead plaintiff have also surfaced.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

The Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling on April 29 that significantly limited the reach of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. The decision in Louisiana v. Callais has prompted several states to redraw congressional maps. Lawmakers in affected states have cited partisan reasons for the changes.

Virginia Democrats filed a lawsuit with the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday seeking to overturn a state court decision that struck down a voter-approved congressional map. The move comes after the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Louisiana v. Callais effectively weakened the Voting Rights Act, prompting several Southern states to redraw districts.

Dilaporkan oleh AI Fakta terverifikasi

South Carolina Republicans are considering new congressional district lines that could put at risk the seat held by Rep. Jim Clyburn, the state’s lone Democratic member of the U.S. House delegation. The effort follows a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision that weakened Voting Rights Act protections for minority districts, and Clyburn says he plans to run no matter how the lines are drawn.

 

 

 

Situs web ini menggunakan cookie

Kami menggunakan cookie untuk analisis guna meningkatkan situs kami. Baca kebijakan privasi kami untuk informasi lebih lanjut.
Tolak