Kelompok hak sipil di Deep South mengecam putusan Mahkamah Agung dalam kasus Callais mengenai peta pemungutan suara

Menyusul putusan Mahkamah Agung AS pada 29 April dalam kasus Callais v. Louisiana—yang membatalkan distrik kongres dengan mayoritas pemilih kulit hitam kedua sebagai tindakan gerrymandering rasial—para advokat hak sipil di Deep South mengutuk keputusan tersebut sebagai ancaman terhadap perwakilan warga kulit hitam. Negara bagian termasuk Alabama, Tennessee, dan Louisiana sedang menyusun ulang peta wilayah, yang memicu janji untuk menempuh jalur hukum dan mobilisasi menjelang pemilihan paruh waktu.

Keputusan dalam kasus Callais v. Louisiana, yang merupakan bagian dari seri mengenai kasus Mahkamah Agung ini, telah memicu reaksi keras di seluruh Deep South, menggemakan perjuangan hak suara di wilayah tersebut sejak pawai Selma tahun 1965. Senator Georgia Raphael Warnock menyebutnya sebagai 'tamparan bagi para martir hak sipil,' yang membangkitkan ingatan akan pengucilan kekuasaan di era Jim Crow. Debbie Elliott dari NPR melaporkan dari Orange Beach, Alabama.

Para pemimpin Partai Republik merespons dengan cepat: Gubernur Alabama Kay Ivey mengadakan sidang khusus mulai hari Senin setelah Jaksa Agung Steve Marshall berupaya mencabut perintah pengadilan, dengan menolak penggunaan sudut pandang 'kulit hitam versus kulit putih.' Gubernur Tennessee Bill Lee menjadwalkan sidang untuk menyasar distrik mayoritas kulit hitam di Memphis. Louisiana membatalkan pemilihan pendahuluan bulan Mei untuk redistricting.

Para pemilih dan advokat kulit hitam menyatakan kekhawatiran. Shalela Dowdy, seorang penggugat dan kandidat dari Alabama, memperingatkan bahwa kekuasaan sedang dirampas dari komunitas kulit hitam, yang menandakan pertempuran hak sipil baru. Melanie Campbell dari National Coalition on Black Civic Participation menegaskan: 'Kami akan berorganisasi, menyusun strategi, dan melakukan mobilisasi... Sejarah telah mengajarkan kita bahwa ketika kita bersatu, kita akan menang.' Gugatan hukum sedang berjalan di Louisiana, dengan pertarungan yang diperkirakan akan berlanjut di pengadilan dan dewan legislatif menjelang pemilihan paruh waktu 2026.

Artikel Terkait

Illustration of the Supreme Court with maps of redrawn districts in Louisiana and Alabama for a news article.
Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

Supreme Court speeds up redistricting changes for southern states

Dilaporkan oleh AI Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a series of recent orders allowing Louisiana and Alabama to redraw congressional maps that eliminate Black opportunity districts. The rulings came in the Louisiana v. Callais case and related Alabama litigation. They mark a sharp shift in the court's approach to voting rights enforcement under the Voting Rights Act.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6–3 on April 29, 2026, in Louisiana v. Callais that Louisiana’s congressional map (SB8) was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, concluding the Voting Rights Act did not require the state to draw an additional majority-Black district. Sen. Raphael Warnock, D-Ga., called the ruling “a massive and devastating blow,” warning it could accelerate redistricting fights across Southern states ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

The US Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision in Callais v. Louisiana, significantly weakening Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act following October 2025 oral arguments. Critics argue the ruling, led by the Republican-appointed majority, invites states to redraw maps entrenching racial disenfranchisement. Republicans expressed satisfaction with the outcome.

Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry (R) postponed the state's U.S. House primaries until at least mid-July via emergency executive order following the Supreme Court's April 29, 2026, ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, which struck down the congressional map as unconstitutional under the Voting Rights Act. The move, praised by President Trump and Speaker Mike Johnson but challenged by a lawsuit, has caused voter confusion amid ongoing early voting for other races, as Republicans eye redistricting gains.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

The U.S. Supreme Court issued an order sending Mississippi and North Dakota state legislative map cases back to lower courts for reconsideration in light of its recent Louisiana v. Callais ruling.

A POLITICO/Public First survey conducted May 9–11 finds a plurality of Democrats say their party should respond to Republican redistricting efforts even if it results in fewer majority-minority districts. The results come weeks after the Supreme Court’s April 29 decision in Louisiana v. Callais, which narrowed how Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act can be used in redistricting disputes.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

Tennessee Republicans voted Thursday to pass new congressional maps expected to eliminate the state's only Democratic U.S. House seat. Republican Governor Bill Lee signed the measure into law shortly afterward. The move followed a Supreme Court decision striking down certain majority-black districts as unconstitutional racial gerrymandering.

 

 

 

Situs web ini menggunakan cookie

Kami menggunakan cookie untuk analisis guna meningkatkan situs kami. Baca kebijakan privasi kami untuk informasi lebih lanjut.
Tolak