Mahkamah Agung Virginia tolak peta daerah pemilihan kongres yang baru

Mahkamah Agung Virginia telah memutuskan bahwa peta daerah pemilihan kongres yang baru dan didukung oleh Partai Demokrat adalah inkonstitusional, membatalkan hasil pemilihan khusus dan membuat negara bagian tersebut tetap menggunakan batas-batas wilayah sebelumnya.

Keputusan 4-3 yang dikeluarkan pada hari Jumat tersebut menyatakan bahwa proses perubahan konstitusi negara bagian melanggar persyaratan pemilihan sela berdasarkan Pasal XII, Bagian 1. Pengadilan menyatakan bahwa pendekatan yang diambil oleh Persemakmuran tersebut merusak integritas pemungutan suara referendum dan menjadikannya batal demi hukum.

Artikel Terkait

Virginia Supreme Court justices rejecting a redistricting map in a courtroom setting
Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

Virginia supreme court strikes down redistricting referendum

Dilaporkan oleh AI Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

The Supreme Court of Virginia ruled Friday that a voter-approved redistricting plan violated state constitutional procedures. The 4-3 decision nullifies the April referendum and keeps the state's existing congressional maps in place. Democrats had sought the change to gain a stronger edge ahead of the 2026 midterms.

The Virginia Supreme Court on Friday struck down a voter-approved redistricting plan that Democrats hoped would add four House seats. The 4-3 ruling cited a procedural error in how the measure reached the ballot. The decision comes amid a broader wave of Republican-led map changes in Southern states.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

The Virginia Supreme Court has struck down a congressional map approved by voters in a recent referendum, ruling it unconstitutional. Democratic leaders have criticized the decision as overturning the will of the people.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on April 29 that Louisiana's congressional map, which included a second majority-Black district, constitutes an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the majority that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act requires proof of intentional discrimination, not just disparate impact. The decision, in Louisiana v. Callais, limits race-based redistricting and prompts new maps in several states.

Dilaporkan oleh AI Fakta terverifikasi

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6–3 on April 29, 2026, in Louisiana v. Callais that Louisiana’s congressional map (SB8) was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, concluding the Voting Rights Act did not require the state to draw an additional majority-Black district. Sen. Raphael Warnock, D-Ga., called the ruling “a massive and devastating blow,” warning it could accelerate redistricting fights across Southern states ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Louisiana Republicans approved a new congressional map that eliminates one of the state's two majority-Black House districts. The change follows a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that narrowed the Voting Rights Act.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

The US Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision in Callais v. Louisiana, significantly weakening Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act following October 2025 oral arguments. Critics argue the ruling, led by the Republican-appointed majority, invites states to redraw maps entrenching racial disenfranchisement. Republicans expressed satisfaction with the outcome.

 

 

 

Situs web ini menggunakan cookie

Kami menggunakan cookie untuk analisis guna meningkatkan situs kami. Baca kebijakan privasi kami untuk informasi lebih lanjut.
Tolak