Court rules employees must pay millions for abandoning employer vehicles

The Employment and Labour Relations Court has ruled that employees could face millions in liability for abandoning their employer's vehicles, stemming from a case where a truck driver sued his employer for unfair dismissal, underpayment, and failure to pay full benefits. The driver received compensation from the company, but the court also ordered him to pay substantial damages for truck damage and unreturned items.

A recent ruling by the Employment and Labour Relations Court highlights the severe financial risks employees face for abandoning employer vehicles. The decision arose from a lawsuit filed by a truck driver against his company, alleging unfair dismissal, underpayment, and denial of full benefits.

The employer defended the termination as lawful, citing the driver's misconduct, negligence, significant losses to a truck, and failure to return company property. However, the court deemed the dismissal unfair, emphasizing that the company failed to provide a fair hearing, despite the driver's abandonment of the vehicle in protest.

The court also determined that the driver's contract labeled him simply as a 'driver,' yet he operated a commercial heavy truck, entitling him to higher pay. Consequently, the company was ordered to pay Ksh 394,508.60 in compensation, Ksh 39,405.86 in notice pay, Ksh 59,221.15 in service pay, Ksh 233,518.32 for underpayments, and Ksh 37,653.85 for accrued leave, totaling Ksh 764,307.78.

In a counterclaim, the employer sought damages for the abandonment, which the court upheld, holding the driver liable for negligence causing truck damage and unreturned tools. The driver was ordered to pay Ksh 2,563,285 for vehicle losses and Ksh 113,000 for items, amounting to roughly Ksh 2.67 million.

Under Section 19 of the Employment Act, employees are accountable for losses from neglecting assigned tools like vehicles. Section 44 classifies abandonment as a fundamental breach of contract, potentially leading to dismissal and liability for employer property damage.

関連記事

Dramatic illustration of a Tesla Gigafactory worker injured by falling Cybertruck parts during a factory accident.
AIによって生成された画像

元テスラ監督者がCybertruck部品の怪我で訴訟

AIによるレポート AIによって生成された画像

テキサス州オースティンのテスラGigafactoryの元安全監督者が、2024年2月に固定されていないCybertruck部品が落下して重傷を負ったとして、同社を相手に訴訟を起こした。原告は、この事故は生産を優先し労働者の保護を後回しにした不十分な安全対策が原因だと主張している。彼は1か月後に解雇された後、100万ドル超の損害賠償を求めている。

The Supreme Court of Appeal has ruled that banks financing second-hand vehicles in South Africa must bear liability for defects, marking a significant shift in consumer protection. In a case involving a pensioner who bought a faulty Ford Ranger, the court ordered WesBank to repay over R170,000. This judgment emphasizes banks' dual role as credit providers and suppliers.

AIによるレポート

Auctioneers in Kenya have issued seven-day and 30-day ultimatums to owners of unclaimed vehicles stored at motor yards across the country, or they will be auctioned. The notices, dated January 9, were published under the Disposal of Uncollected Goods Act (Cap. 38). Owners must pay storage fees to retrieve their vehicles.

ミネソタ州のCybertruckオーナー、リチャード・エデル氏が、新しい車両がテスラのサービスセンターに駐車中だった際に損傷を受け、苛立ちを覚えた。輸送ドライバーが通常のサービス訪問中にトラックに衝突し、大きな修理が必要となった。テスラが保険請求を処理しているが、オーナーは車両の価値への長期的な影響を懸念している。

AIによるレポート

A Johannesburg High Court judgment has ordered former VhaVenda king Toni Mphephu, his nephew Oscar Thobakgale and the Dzata Trust to repay R17.29-million linked to the VBS Mutual Bank scandal. The 2 March ruling by Judge Johann Gautschi found the payments from Vele Investments to be dispositions without value. Respondents failed to demonstrate any value received by the bank in return.

マイアミの連邦判事は、テスラが2019年の同社Autopilotシステムを巡る死亡事故に関連する2億4300万ドルの陪審団判決を覆す試みを拒否した。この判決は、証拠が判決を強く支持すると判断した裁判所の決定を支持する。これにより、運転支援技術に関する継続的な訴訟の中で、テスラの第一審裁判所レベルの選択肢は尽きた。

AIによるレポート

The Environment and Land Court has ruled in favor of a private printing firm in Nairobi's Industrial Area, blocking its forced eviction and directing authorities to clean up illegal dumping along the Ngong River. The company contested a May 2, 2024, Public Security Order, arguing it was unlawful and infringed on its constitutional property rights under Article 40. The court mandated NEMA, Nairobi City County, and the Ministry of Environment to remove the waste within four months.

 

 

 

このウェブサイトはCookieを使用します

サイトを改善するための分析にCookieを使用します。詳細については、プライバシーポリシーをお読みください。
拒否