Japan to reconsider handcuffs and ropes for court defendants

Japan's Supreme Court has instructed courts nationwide to reconsider the use of handcuffs and waist ropes on defendants entering courtrooms for criminal trials. Detained defendants currently wear these restraints to prevent flight, but new measures aim to shield them from spectators' view. Existing rules will still apply for those deemed flight risks.

The Supreme Court has directed courts across Japan to review the practice of using handcuffs and waist ropes on defendants as they enter courtrooms for criminal trials, according to informed sources on Tuesday. These restraints are typically worn by detained defendants until the judge arrives, aimed at preventing any escape attempts.

In lay judge trials, which involve public participation, the restraints are removed to avoid prejudicing perceptions of guilt. However, courtroom spectators can still catch sight of defendants in restraints. Under the proposed new guidelines, courts would remove the handcuffs and ropes behind partitions near the courtroom entrances, on the judge's orders. Additional steps would ensure that spectators do not see restrained defendants when they exit.

The existing protocol remains in place for defendants assessed as flight risks.

This development follows a 2019 request from the Japan Federation of Bar Associations to eliminate the use of such restraints during entry and exit from courtrooms. The Supreme Court's guidance could lead to more humane practices in judicial proceedings.

Verwandte Artikel

South Korea's Supreme Court with banner announcing judicial reform laws taking effect on March 12, enabling constitutional appeals; judges and politicians celebrating.
Bild generiert von KI

South Korea's judicial reform laws take effect, enabling constitutional appeals

Von KI berichtet Bild generiert von KI

South Korea's judicial reform laws were proclaimed on March 12, allowing constitutional appeals against Supreme Court rulings and punishment for legal distortion. This marks the first major overhaul since the 1987 constitutional amendment, including an expansion of Supreme Court justices. The measures passed under the ruling Democratic Party despite opposition from the opposition and judiciary.

The Osaka District Court dismissed a request from three death-row inmates to ban executions by hanging, ruling that such a challenge is inappropriate through administrative litigation. The inmates argued that hanging violates an international treaty prohibiting cruel punishments. Presiding Judge Noriko Yokota stated that criminal judgments in Japan presuppose hanging as the method of execution.

Von KI berichtet

One week after South Korea's judicial reform laws took effect on March 12—introducing constitutional appeals and penalties for 'law distortion'—complaints against top judges have risen sharply. The National Assembly is set to vote Thursday on the remaining two bills of the 'judiciary trio,' prompting fears of paralyzing the judiciary.

South Korea's Supreme Court opened a three-day public hearing on Tuesday to discuss proposed judicial reforms amid concerns from the judiciary. The event aims to gather opinions from various sectors on enhancing transparency and expanding public participation. It follows recent legislative pushes by the ruling Democratic Party.

Von KI berichtet

For the first time, revisions to Japan's family law will allow parents to choose sole or joint custody after divorce. Effective from April, the system promises more child time for some parents but sparks fear among domestic violence survivors.

Justizminister Gérald Darmanin gab am 4. Februar bekannt, dass er aufgrund begrenzter Parlamentszeit zwei separate Gesetzesvorlagen zur Reform des Justizsystems vorlegen wird. Die erste zielt darauf ab, Verzögerungen bei Urteilen in Strafsachen zu halbieren, die zweite wird die Vollstreckung von Strafen behandeln.

Von KI berichtet

Representative judges from courts nationwide met on Monday to discuss the Democratic Party of Korea's push for judicial reform, following concerns voiced by top judicial officials over proposed bills. The gathering aims to address ways to restore public trust in the judiciary amid legislative debates.

 

 

 

Diese Website verwendet Cookies

Wir verwenden Cookies für Analysen, um unsere Website zu verbessern. Lesen Sie unsere Datenschutzrichtlinie für weitere Informationen.
Ablehnen