SolGen recommends acquittal of Ressa and researcher in libel case

The Office of the Solicitor General has recommended the acquittal of Nobel laureate Maria Ressa and former researcher Reynaldo Santos Jr. in their cyberlibel case against businessman Wilfredo Keng. The recommendation is based on a Supreme Court ruling that the prescription period for cyber libel is one year. The motion was filed with the Supreme Court in March 2026.

On March 10, 2026, the Office of the Solicitor General (SolGen) announced its recommendation for the acquittal of Maria Ressa, CEO of Rappler, and Reynaldo Santos Jr., a former Rappler researcher, in the cyberlibel case filed against them by businessman Wilfredo Keng. The SolGen stated that the charges were filed beyond the one-year prescription period, as clarified by the Supreme Court in Berteni Causing v. People in October 2023.

The 2012 Rappler article linked Keng to former Chief Justice Renato Corona. Keng discovered it in 2016, but filed the complaint in 2018 and the case in February 2019. Thus, the one-year prescription period had expired in 2017, according to the SolGen.

On June 15, 2020, a Manila Regional Trial Court convicted them of cyber libel, imposing a sentence of six months to six years in prison and P400,000 in damages each. The Court of Appeals denied their appeal in October 2022, leading them to file a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court in 2022.

The SolGen noted that it now accepts the Causing decision, which clarified that cyber libel is not a new offense but governed by the Revised Penal Code with a one-year prescription from the discovery of the offense. However, the SolGen emphasized that this does not make cyber libel protected speech, and penalties remain important to safeguard reputation, privacy, and dignity.

"Although the OSG previously sought reconsideration in Causing, it manifested... that the government now accepts the Court’s decision," the SolGen stated. It also referenced amicus curiae submissions from UN Special Rapporteur Irene Khan, highlighting the need for clear limiting principles in cyber libel prosecutions, especially in matters of public interest.

Verwandte Artikel

Courtroom scene depicting the acquittal of defendants in the SQM case, showing relieved figures like Pablo Longueira and Marco Enríquez-Ominami amid a historic verdict in Santiago.
Bild generiert von KI

Gericht spricht Angeklagte im SQM-Fall nach 11-jährigem Verfahren frei

Von KI berichtet Bild generiert von KI

Das Dritte Mündliche Strafgericht in Santiago hat acht Angeklagte im SQM-Fall per Mehrheitsbeschluss freigesprochen, darunter den ehemaligen Senator Pablo Longueira und den Kandidaten Marco Enríquez-Ominami, und kritisierte die Dauer des Verfahrens sowie die Qualität der Beweise der Staatsanwaltschaft. Das Urteil hebt eine Verletzung des Rechts auf ein zeitnahes Verfahren nach 11 Jahren Untersuchung und einem dreijährigen Prozess hervor. Das Urteil wird im August 2026 verkündet und lässt Raum für eine Nichtigkeitsberufung.

Billionaire Enrique Razon has filed cyberlibel complaints against suspended Cavite Representative Francisco "Kiko" Barzaga over statements targeting the business tycoon. The complaints focus on a January 9 Facebook post by Barzaga accusing Razon of bribing National Unity Party lawmakers. Barzaga has stated he is ready to face Razon in court.

Von KI berichtet

A Nairobi court has acquitted activist Nuru Okanga of cybercrime charges linked to alleged incitement against President William Ruto. Magistrate Rose Ndombi ruled that prosecutors failed to provide evidence connecting Okanga to the contentious video. Defended by 10 lawyers, Okanga vowed to continue advocating for justice and return to secondary school.

Senate President Pro Tempore Panfilo Lacson has urged the Office of the Solicitor General to review the Supreme Court's 'fugitive disentitlement doctrine' to restrict legal avenues for fugitives like former congressman Zaldy Co and businessman Charlie 'Atong' Ang. The call follows a 2025 court decision clarifying rules on those evading justice. This aims to prevent accused individuals from seeking relief while avoiding court jurisdiction.

Von KI berichtet

Gabriela Representative Sarah Elago has filed a disbarment complaint against a lawyer for alleged misogynistic remarks against her. This raises questions about whether lawyers can lose their license for such language. In 2023, the Supreme Court disbarred lawyer Larry Gadon for his sexist and abusive statements.

The Supreme Court has ruled that Vice President Sara Duterte's first impeachment case is unconstitutional due to violations of the one-year bar rule and due process. It clarified that new complaints can now be filed immediately. Duterte's lawyers are prepared for potential future proceedings.

Von KI berichtet

The Supreme Court of the Philippines has ruled the impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte unconstitutional due to timing issues. Associate Justice Marvic Leonen authored the decision, igniting debates over the court's role in impeachment proceedings. Critics contend this intervention shields Duterte from accountability.

 

 

 

Diese Website verwendet Cookies

Wir verwenden Cookies für Analysen, um unsere Website zu verbessern. Lesen Sie unsere Datenschutzrichtlinie für weitere Informationen.
Ablehnen