Supreme Court takes up Guam munitions case

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal from the U.S. Air Force over open detonation of obsolete munitions on Tarague Beach in Guam. The site holds cultural importance for the CHamoru people and sits above the island's main drinking water aquifer. A federal appeals court had ruled in favor of requiring environmental analysis under NEPA.

Tarague Beach, part of Andersen Air Force Base in northern Guam, is the focus of a legal battle. The Air Force seeks to continue open detonations of legacy munitions there, a practice for which it has applied for permits since 1982. The beach overlies Guam's sole-source aquifer, supplying 80 percent of the island's drinking water, and supports endangered sea turtles and migratory seabirds. CHamoru activist Moneaka Flores, whose family once owned land there for coconut cultivation, pig raising, and fishing, views the Supreme Court appeal as a delay. “This is actually a delay for justice for us,” Flores said. “We were moving forward in the District Court, and I consider this move by the Department of War to challenge it at the Supreme Court as a strategy to delay justice for our people and to answer to the law.” In 2022, Flores and her group Prutehi Litekyan sued, arguing the Air Force must analyze alternatives under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). A 2018 National Academies report confirmed less-polluting options exist. Last year, a federal appeals court sided with them, but the Air Force appealed, claiming compliance with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) suffices, without needing NEPA's broader review. The case carries broader implications. Neil Weare of Right to Democracy noted it fits a trend of Supreme Court deference to federal power in territories. David Henkin of Earthjustice, representing the plaintiffs, said a ruling could take another year and emphasized NEPA's requirement for holistic reviews, including cultural impacts. Flores linked it to historical land seizures post-World War II, when the military took nearly two-thirds of Guam, and ongoing environmental concerns.

관련 기사

The U.S. Supreme Court building with journalists and protesters on the steps, symbolizing skepticism toward Trump's IEEPA tariffs during a key hearing.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Supreme Court signals skepticism toward Trump’s IEEPA tariffs

AI에 의해 보고됨 AI에 의해 생성된 이미지 사실 확인됨

The Supreme Court on Wednesday heard consolidated challenges to President Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs. Justices across the ideological spectrum pressed whether the emergency‑powers law at issue authorizes sweeping import duties, leaving the outcome uncertain.

A team of international researchers has accused the US government of hastening the collapse of coral reefs around Guam through military expansions and proposed rollbacks to the Endangered Species Act. In a letter published in Science this month, they highlight how national security priorities are overriding conservation efforts. Without changes, these reefs face functional extinction similar to those in Florida.

AI에 의해 보고됨

타클로반시 제45지방법원은 활동가 프렌치 메 쿰피오와 마리엘 도메킬이 제기한 테러 자금 조달 혐의 유죄 판결에 대한 재심 청구와 보석 신청을 기각했다. 필리핀 기자협회(NUJP)와 KAPATID 등 단체들은 이번 판결이 위험한 선례를 남겼다고 비판했으며, 변호인단은 판결 뒤집기를 위한 법적 대응을 예고했다.

미국 대법원은 트럼프 대통령의 1977년 국제긴급경제권한법(IEEPA)을 이용한 광범위한 관세 부과를 무효로 판결했다. 이는 그의 무역 정책에 큰 타격을 주었으며, 한국 등과의 무역 협정에 영향을 미칠 전망이다. 트럼프는 즉시 새로운 10% 글로벌 관세를 도입했다.

AI에 의해 보고됨

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration cannot deploy National Guard troops to Chicago to address violence during federal immigration raids. The 6-3 decision came after pushback from Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, who argued that local forces were sufficient. The ruling focuses on the lack of federal authority to use military in the state.

The Chilean government presented an eviction plan for the Cerro Centinela megatoma in San Antonio to the Valparaíso Court of Appeals, which will not begin before January 2026. The measure includes the expropriation of over 110 hectares for a housing project benefiting 90% of affected families. The decision aims to avoid a humanitarian crisis in a settlement housing over 10,000 people.

AI에 의해 보고됨

The US Supreme Court has ruled six to three that President Donald Trump exceeded his authority by imposing special tariffs on imports from dozens of countries. The tariffs, based on a 1977 emergency provision, are invalid. Trump now announces a new general ten percent tariff.

 

 

 

이 웹사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다

사이트를 개선하기 위해 분석을 위한 쿠키를 사용합니다. 자세한 내용은 개인정보 보호 정책을 읽으세요.
거부