El Departamento de Justicia admite haber presentado un documento erróneo en un caso de fraude electoral

El Departamento de Justicia de los Estados Unidos reconoció un error de presentación en un caso ante un tribunal federal de Nuevo Hampshire relacionado con acusaciones de fraude electoral. Los funcionarios presentaron una moción el viernes para retirar un aviso que estaba destinado a una demanda diferente en Minnesota. El Departamento de Justicia también presentó el documento correcto poco después.

La fiscal general adjunta Harmeet K. Dhillon y los fiscales de la División de Derechos Civiles presentaron la moción de dos páginas en el caso de Granite State de septiembre de 2025. El documento declaraba que el aviso de autoridad suplementaria fue presentado por error y solicitaba su retirada del expediente. El aviso fuera de lugar correspondía en realidad a un caso de fraude electoral en Minnesota presentado contra el estado y su secretario de estado el mismo día del año pasado.

Artículos relacionados

Dramatic split-scene illustration of Democratic attorneys general strategizing against Trump's proof-of-citizenship voting bill, backed by a supportive Heritage poll.
Imagen generada por IA

Democratic attorneys general organize legal preparations as Trump backs proof-of-citizenship voting bill and Heritage Action poll shows broad support

Reportado por IA Imagen generada por IA Verificado por hechos

Democratic state attorneys general have stepped up legal and political efforts ahead of the 2026 midterm elections as President Donald Trump promotes federal changes to election rules, including a House-passed bill tied to proof of citizenship. A Heritage Action-commissioned poll reported majority support for those requirements in five states.

The US Department of Justice has appealed a district court's dismissal of criminal cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James. The appeal centers on the validity of interim US Attorney Lindsey Halligan's appointment and Attorney General Pam Bondi's retroactive ratification of her actions. The DOJ argues that any flaws were harmless and do not warrant dismissal.

Reportado por IA

A federal judge in Georgia ruled that the Department of Justice must reveal the names of three witnesses in a case over the 2020 election ballot seizure. The decision came because their identities are already publicly known. U.S. District Judge J.P. Boulee, a Trump appointee, ordered the unredacted affidavits filed within two days.

Lawyers Defending American Democracy, joined by former White House lawyer Ty Cobb, filed an ethics complaint with the D.C. Bar against DOJ Deputy Assistant Attorney General Drew Ensign. The group accuses Ensign of making false statements to U.S. District Judge James Boasberg during a hearing on Alien Enemies Act deportations. The complaint stems from a mid-March 2025 emergency order that the government allegedly ignored.

Reportado por IA

The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments on March 23 in Watson v. Republican National Committee, weighing whether states can count mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day but received later. The case challenges a Mississippi law allowing a five-day grace period, with similar rules in over 30 states. Conservative justices expressed concerns over fraud risks, while liberals defended state authority.

Este sitio web utiliza cookies

Utilizamos cookies para análisis con el fin de mejorar nuestro sitio. Lee nuestra política de privacidad para más información.
Rechazar