Pengadilan D.C. Circuit pertahankan penundaan kunjungan ke fasilitas ICE

Departemen Kehakiman gagal mendapatkan penundaan atas perintah pengadilan yang lebih rendah yang memblokir kebijakan mereka yang mengharuskan pemberitahuan terlebih dahulu untuk kunjungan ke fasilitas detensi imigrasi. Keputusan bulat dari D.C. Circuit keluar pada hari Jumat setelah para hakim memutuskan bahwa pemerintah tidak menunjukkan kerugian yang cukup akibat pengawasan kongres yang tidak diberitahukan sebelumnya. Hakim Pengadilan Sirkuit AS Neomi Rao, dalam pendapat yang setuju, sepakat bahwa pemerintah gagal memenuhi persyaratan meskipun ia berpendapat bahwa pemerintah kemungkinan besar akan menang dalam banding.

Kebijakan yang diterapkan oleh ICE tersebut mengamanatkan pemberitahuan setidaknya tujuh hari untuk kunjungan kongres ke fasilitas-fasilitas terkait. Kebijakan ini digugat dalam tuntutan hukum yang dipimpin oleh anggota DPR Joe Neguse dari Colorado dan anggota Partai Demokrat lainnya, yang berargumen bahwa kebijakan tersebut melanggar hukum federal yang memberikan akses untuk pengawasan. Hakim Distrik AS Jia Cobb mengeluarkan perintah penundaan pada Maret 2026, dan perintah tersebut tetap berlaku menyusul keputusan pengadilan banding.

Artikel Terkait

Illustration of a federal appeals court gavel blocking Trump's border 'invasion' proclamation, with asylum seekers at an opening U.S.-Mexico border gate.
Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

Appeals court blocks Trump’s ‘invasion’ border proclamation, clearing path to resume asylum processing

Dilaporkan oleh AI Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI Fakta terverifikasi

A federal appeals court on Friday ruled that President Donald Trump’s proclamation describing migration at the U.S.-Mexico border as an “invasion” and using that finding to suspend access to asylum exceeds the authority Congress granted in immigration law. The decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit could require the government to restart at-the-border asylum processing, though the administration has indicated it plans to seek further review.

A divided panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has endorsed the Trump administration's reinterpretation of a 1996 immigration law, allowing mandatory detention without bond for unauthorized immigrants already in the United States. The 2-1 decision, issued on a recent Friday, applies to Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi, advancing plans for large-scale detention facilities. This ruling supports the administration's mass deportation efforts amid ongoing legal challenges.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

A federal judge in West Virginia has issued a stern warning to officials, stating that continued illegal detentions by Immigration and Customs Enforcement will lead to contempt proceedings and sanctions without qualified immunity. The ruling comes in a habeas corpus case involving Miguel Antonio Dominguez Izaguirre, whose detention was deemed a violation of due process rights. This decision highlights ongoing judicial rejections of the government's interpretation of immigration detention laws.

Top officials from U.S. immigration agencies testified before the House Homeland Security Committee on February 10, 2026, amid criticism over tactics following the fatal shootings of two U.S. citizens in Minneapolis. The hearing occurs as Congress faces a Friday deadline to fund the Department of Homeland Security, with Democrats demanding reforms to enforcement practices. Partisan tensions highlighted divides, though some bipartisan concerns emerged on training and oversight.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

A federal judge in Utah has issued a temporary restraining order against Immigration and Customs Enforcement, requiring the agency to justify why Lorenzo Chavez Rascon should remain detained after an arrest that involved dried pinto beans mistaken for drugs. The ruling highlights concerns over due process in immigration enforcement. Chavez, who has deferred action status from a bona fide U-visa petition, faces no criminal charges.

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., has ruled that the IRS violated internal rules approximately 42,695 times by disclosing confidential taxpayer addresses to Immigration and Customs Enforcement without proper verification. The decision stems from a lawsuit filed by a nonprofit and two unions challenging data-sharing practices under the Trump administration. The ruling highlights procedural lapses in over 47,000 requests from ICE.

Situs web ini menggunakan cookie

Kami menggunakan cookie untuk analisis guna meningkatkan situs kami. Baca kebijakan privasi kami untuk informasi lebih lanjut.
Tolak