Tribunal do Distrito de Columbia mantém suspensão de norma sobre visitas a instalações do ICE

O Departamento de Justiça não conseguiu obter uma suspensão da ordem judicial que bloqueou sua política de exigir aviso prévio para visitas a centros de detenção de imigrantes. A decisão unânime do tribunal do Distrito de Columbia foi emitida na sexta-feira, após os juízes concluírem que o governo não demonstrou prejuízo suficiente decorrente de fiscalizações parlamentares sem aviso prévio. A juíza de circuito Neomi Rao, em um parecer concordante, admitiu que a administração não apresentou argumentos suficientes, embora tenha manifestado sua visão de que o governo provavelmente vencerá o recurso.

A política, implementada pelo ICE, exigia pelo menos sete dias de aviso prévio para visitas de parlamentares às instalações. A medida foi contestada em um processo liderado pelo deputado Joe Neguse, do Colorado, e outros democratas, que argumentaram que ela violava a lei federal que garante acesso para fins de fiscalização. A juíza distrital Jia Cobb emitiu uma liminar em março de 2026, e essa ordem permanece em vigor após a decisão do tribunal de apelações.

Artigos relacionados

Illustration of a federal appeals court gavel blocking Trump's border 'invasion' proclamation, with asylum seekers at an opening U.S.-Mexico border gate.
Imagem gerada por IA

Appeals court blocks Trump’s ‘invasion’ border proclamation, clearing path to resume asylum processing

Reportado por IA Imagem gerada por IA Verificado

A federal appeals court on Friday ruled that President Donald Trump’s proclamation describing migration at the U.S.-Mexico border as an “invasion” and using that finding to suspend access to asylum exceeds the authority Congress granted in immigration law. The decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit could require the government to restart at-the-border asylum processing, though the administration has indicated it plans to seek further review.

A divided panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has endorsed the Trump administration's reinterpretation of a 1996 immigration law, allowing mandatory detention without bond for unauthorized immigrants already in the United States. The 2-1 decision, issued on a recent Friday, applies to Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi, advancing plans for large-scale detention facilities. This ruling supports the administration's mass deportation efforts amid ongoing legal challenges.

Reportado por IA

A federal judge in West Virginia has issued a stern warning to officials, stating that continued illegal detentions by Immigration and Customs Enforcement will lead to contempt proceedings and sanctions without qualified immunity. The ruling comes in a habeas corpus case involving Miguel Antonio Dominguez Izaguirre, whose detention was deemed a violation of due process rights. This decision highlights ongoing judicial rejections of the government's interpretation of immigration detention laws.

Top officials from U.S. immigration agencies testified before the House Homeland Security Committee on February 10, 2026, amid criticism over tactics following the fatal shootings of two U.S. citizens in Minneapolis. The hearing occurs as Congress faces a Friday deadline to fund the Department of Homeland Security, with Democrats demanding reforms to enforcement practices. Partisan tensions highlighted divides, though some bipartisan concerns emerged on training and oversight.

Reportado por IA

A federal judge in Utah has issued a temporary restraining order against Immigration and Customs Enforcement, requiring the agency to justify why Lorenzo Chavez Rascon should remain detained after an arrest that involved dried pinto beans mistaken for drugs. The ruling highlights concerns over due process in immigration enforcement. Chavez, who has deferred action status from a bona fide U-visa petition, faces no criminal charges.

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., has ruled that the IRS violated internal rules approximately 42,695 times by disclosing confidential taxpayer addresses to Immigration and Customs Enforcement without proper verification. The decision stems from a lawsuit filed by a nonprofit and two unions challenging data-sharing practices under the Trump administration. The ruling highlights procedural lapses in over 47,000 requests from ICE.

Este site usa cookies

Usamos cookies para análise para melhorar nosso site. Leia nossa política de privacidade para mais informações.
Recusar