D.C. Circuit bibehåller förbud mot föranmälan vid besök på ICE-anläggningar

Justitiedepartementet lyckades inte få igenom ett upphävande av ett beslut i lägre instans som blockerar myndighetens policy om krav på föranmälan för besök vid immigrationsförvar. Det enhälliga beslutet från D.C. Circuit kom i fredags efter att domarna funnit att regeringen inte kunnat påvisa tillräcklig skada till följd av oannonserad kongressinspektion. U.S. Circuit Judge Neomi Rao instämde i ett tilläggsyttrande i att administrationen inte nått upp till kraven, trots hennes bedömning att regeringen sannolikt kommer att vinna målet i ett överklagande.

Policyn, som implementerades av ICE, krävde minst sju dagars varsel för kongressbesök vid anläggningarna. Den överklagades i en rättsprocess ledd av kongressledamoten Joe Neguse från Colorado och andra demokrater, vilka hävdade att policyn stred mot federal lagstiftning som garanterar tillträde för tillsynsbesök. U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb utfärdade ett interimistiskt förbud i mars 2026, och det beslutet kvarstår efter appellationsdomstolens dom.

Relaterade artiklar

Illustration of a federal appeals court gavel blocking Trump's border 'invasion' proclamation, with asylum seekers at an opening U.S.-Mexico border gate.
Bild genererad av AI

Appeals court blocks Trump’s ‘invasion’ border proclamation, clearing path to resume asylum processing

Rapporterad av AI Bild genererad av AI Faktagranskad

A federal appeals court on Friday ruled that President Donald Trump’s proclamation describing migration at the U.S.-Mexico border as an “invasion” and using that finding to suspend access to asylum exceeds the authority Congress granted in immigration law. The decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit could require the government to restart at-the-border asylum processing, though the administration has indicated it plans to seek further review.

A divided panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has endorsed the Trump administration's reinterpretation of a 1996 immigration law, allowing mandatory detention without bond for unauthorized immigrants already in the United States. The 2-1 decision, issued on a recent Friday, applies to Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi, advancing plans for large-scale detention facilities. This ruling supports the administration's mass deportation efforts amid ongoing legal challenges.

Rapporterad av AI

A federal judge in West Virginia has issued a stern warning to officials, stating that continued illegal detentions by Immigration and Customs Enforcement will lead to contempt proceedings and sanctions without qualified immunity. The ruling comes in a habeas corpus case involving Miguel Antonio Dominguez Izaguirre, whose detention was deemed a violation of due process rights. This decision highlights ongoing judicial rejections of the government's interpretation of immigration detention laws.

Top officials from U.S. immigration agencies testified before the House Homeland Security Committee on February 10, 2026, amid criticism over tactics following the fatal shootings of two U.S. citizens in Minneapolis. The hearing occurs as Congress faces a Friday deadline to fund the Department of Homeland Security, with Democrats demanding reforms to enforcement practices. Partisan tensions highlighted divides, though some bipartisan concerns emerged on training and oversight.

Rapporterad av AI

A federal judge in Utah has issued a temporary restraining order against Immigration and Customs Enforcement, requiring the agency to justify why Lorenzo Chavez Rascon should remain detained after an arrest that involved dried pinto beans mistaken for drugs. The ruling highlights concerns over due process in immigration enforcement. Chavez, who has deferred action status from a bona fide U-visa petition, faces no criminal charges.

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., has ruled that the IRS violated internal rules approximately 42,695 times by disclosing confidential taxpayer addresses to Immigration and Customs Enforcement without proper verification. The decision stems from a lawsuit filed by a nonprofit and two unions challenging data-sharing practices under the Trump administration. The ruling highlights procedural lapses in over 47,000 requests from ICE.

Denna webbplats använder cookies

Vi använder cookies för analys för att förbättra vår webbplats. Läs vår integritetspolicy för mer information.
Avböj