La cour d'appel fédérale de D.C. maintient la suspension des règles de visite des centres de l'ICE

Le ministère de la Justice n'a pas réussi à obtenir la suspension d'une décision de justice de première instance bloquant sa politique exigeant un préavis pour les visites dans les centres de détention pour immigrés. La décision unanime de la cour d'appel du circuit de D.C. a été rendue vendredi après que les juges ont estimé que le gouvernement n'avait pas démontré que les visites de contrôle inopinées du Congrès lui causaient un préjudice suffisant. La juge fédérale Neomi Rao, dans une opinion concordante, a admis que l'administration n'avait pas apporté les preuves nécessaires, tout en soulignant qu'à son avis, le gouvernement avait de bonnes chances d'obtenir gain de cause en appel.

Cette politique, mise en œuvre par l'ICE, imposait un préavis d'au moins sept jours pour les visites des membres du Congrès dans les centres. Elle a été contestée dans le cadre d'un recours mené par le représentant du Colorado Joe Neguse et d'autres démocrates, qui soutenaient qu'elle violait la loi fédérale garantissant l'accès aux fins de contrôle. La juge de district Jia Cobb avait ordonné une suspension en mars 2026, et cette ordonnance reste en vigueur à la suite de la décision de la cour d'appel.

Articles connexes

Illustration of a federal appeals court gavel blocking Trump's border 'invasion' proclamation, with asylum seekers at an opening U.S.-Mexico border gate.
Image générée par IA

Appeals court blocks Trump’s ‘invasion’ border proclamation, clearing path to resume asylum processing

Rapporté par l'IA Image générée par IA Vérifié par des faits

A federal appeals court on Friday ruled that President Donald Trump’s proclamation describing migration at the U.S.-Mexico border as an “invasion” and using that finding to suspend access to asylum exceeds the authority Congress granted in immigration law. The decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit could require the government to restart at-the-border asylum processing, though the administration has indicated it plans to seek further review.

A divided panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has endorsed the Trump administration's reinterpretation of a 1996 immigration law, allowing mandatory detention without bond for unauthorized immigrants already in the United States. The 2-1 decision, issued on a recent Friday, applies to Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi, advancing plans for large-scale detention facilities. This ruling supports the administration's mass deportation efforts amid ongoing legal challenges.

Rapporté par l'IA

A federal judge in West Virginia has issued a stern warning to officials, stating that continued illegal detentions by Immigration and Customs Enforcement will lead to contempt proceedings and sanctions without qualified immunity. The ruling comes in a habeas corpus case involving Miguel Antonio Dominguez Izaguirre, whose detention was deemed a violation of due process rights. This decision highlights ongoing judicial rejections of the government's interpretation of immigration detention laws.

Top officials from U.S. immigration agencies testified before the House Homeland Security Committee on February 10, 2026, amid criticism over tactics following the fatal shootings of two U.S. citizens in Minneapolis. The hearing occurs as Congress faces a Friday deadline to fund the Department of Homeland Security, with Democrats demanding reforms to enforcement practices. Partisan tensions highlighted divides, though some bipartisan concerns emerged on training and oversight.

Rapporté par l'IA

A federal judge in Utah has issued a temporary restraining order against Immigration and Customs Enforcement, requiring the agency to justify why Lorenzo Chavez Rascon should remain detained after an arrest that involved dried pinto beans mistaken for drugs. The ruling highlights concerns over due process in immigration enforcement. Chavez, who has deferred action status from a bona fide U-visa petition, faces no criminal charges.

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., has ruled that the IRS violated internal rules approximately 42,695 times by disclosing confidential taxpayer addresses to Immigration and Customs Enforcement without proper verification. The decision stems from a lawsuit filed by a nonprofit and two unions challenging data-sharing practices under the Trump administration. The ruling highlights procedural lapses in over 47,000 requests from ICE.

Ce site utilise des cookies

Nous utilisons des cookies pour l'analyse afin d'améliorer notre site. Lisez notre politique de confidentialité pour plus d'informations.
Refuser