Alina Habba resigns as acting U.S. attorney for New Jersey, depicted leaving federal courthouse with resignation document after court ruling.
Imagen generada por IA

Alina Habba resigns as acting U.S. attorney in New Jersey after court ruling

Imagen generada por IA
Verificado por hechos

Alina Habba, a former personal attorney for Donald Trump, has resigned as acting U.S. attorney for New Jersey after a federal appeals court ruled that her appointment violated federal vacancies law. She said she was stepping down to protect the office’s integrity while continuing to serve in a new advisory role at the Justice Department.

Alina Habba resigned on Monday as the acting U.S. attorney for the District of New Jersey, days after a unanimous ruling by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that she had been unlawfully serving in the post.

The appeals court found that the Trump administration ran afoul of federal appointments law by keeping Habba in charge of the office after her 120‑day interim term expired without Senate confirmation, affirming an earlier district court decision that disqualified her from the role. According to Reuters and other outlets, some criminal matters in New Jersey’s federal courts were slowed or paused amid uncertainty over who was lawfully in charge of the office.

Habba, who rose to national prominence representing Trump in civil and other legal matters before his current term, was appointed interim U.S. attorney in March 2025 and later designated acting U.S. attorney. President Donald Trump nominated her for the permanent job, but the Senate has not acted on the nomination.

When her initial interim tenure ended after 120 days, New Jersey’s federal district court judges declined to extend her in the role and instead selected veteran career prosecutor Desiree Grace, who had been serving as Habba’s chief deputy, to lead the office. Attorney General Pam Bondi then removed Grace and placed Habba back in a senior position in the office, a maneuver that allowed Habba to continue exercising authority as acting U.S. attorney until the courts intervened.

In a statement released on social media and through the Justice Department, Habba said her departure should not be seen as a concession. She said she was stepping down "to protect the stability and integrity of the office" but insisted that "this decision will not weaken the Justice Department and it will not weaken me," according to accounts in national media. Habba will remain at the Justice Department as a senior adviser to Attorney General Pam Bondi on issues involving U.S. attorneys nationwide.

Bondi has sharply criticized the rulings against Habba, calling the appellate decision legally flawed and arguing that judges are improperly constraining the administration’s ability to staff top prosecutorial posts. She has vowed to seek further review of the case and has suggested that Habba could potentially return to the New Jersey office if the decision is overturned.

New Jersey’s Democratic U.S. senators, Cory Booker and Andy Kim, praised the 3rd Circuit’s decision and said it vindicated their longstanding objections to how the administration handled Habba’s appointment. In a joint statement released on Dec. 1, they said the ruling "affirms that Alina Habba has been unlawfully serving as U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey" and that the Trump administration’s effort to bypass clear legal requirements to install a loyalist "undermined the legitimacy of the U.S. Attorney’s Office in New Jersey."

The dispute over Habba’s status is part of a wider clash between the Trump administration and the federal courts over efforts to install preferred candidates in top Justice Department posts without Senate confirmation. Legal challenges to other interim U.S. attorney appointments are pending in several jurisdictions, and the 3rd Circuit’s ruling in Habba’s case is viewed by legal analysts as an important test of the limits on the administration’s appointment powers.

Qué dice la gente

Reactions on X to Alina Habba's resignation as acting U.S. Attorney for New Jersey after a federal appeals court ruled her appointment unlawful are polarized. Left-leaning accounts and influencers celebrated the outcome as upholding the rule of law and ending an unqualified tenure. Right-leaning users and media praised her defiant statement refusing to view it as surrender, noting her new senior advisory role at DOJ. Democratic senators criticized the appointment as politically motivated and called for a qualified, Senate-confirmed nominee.

Artículos relacionados

Federal judge dismissing cases against Comey and James in courtroom, gavel strike.
Imagen generada por IA

Judge tosses Comey and Letitia James cases after finding prosecutor was unlawfully appointed

Reportado por IA Imagen generada por IA Verificado por hechos

A federal judge in Virginia has dismissed the Justice Department’s criminal cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, ruling that the acting U.S. attorney who secured the indictments was unlawfully appointed. The dismissals were issued without prejudice, leaving open the possibility that prosecutors could try to bring new charges.

Lindsey Halligan, una exayudante del presidente Trump sin experiencia en la fiscalía, ha abandonado su rol interino como fiscal de EE.UU. para el este de Virginia tras fallos que declararon ilegal su nombramiento. Esta salida pone fin a un controvertido período marcado por intentos fallidos de imputación contra el exdirector del FBI James Comey y la fiscal general de Nueva York Letitia James. Jueces federales citaron violaciones de los procesos legales de nombramiento en sus decisiones.

Reportado por IA

El Departamento de Justicia del presidente Donald Trump enfrenta una semana turbulenta marcada por investigaciones contra adversarios políticos y frustraciones internas. La fiscal general Pam Bondi está bajo escrutinio mientras Trump impulsa persecuciones agresivas contra sus críticos. Renuncias e investigaciones destacan tensiones crecientes dentro de la administración.

El presidente Donald Trump ha presentado un recurso de 96 páginas ante un tribunal de apelaciones de Nueva York para revocar su condena por delito grave en el caso de dinero de silencio de Manhattan, argumentando que el juicio se basó indebidamente en pruebas vinculadas a sus actos oficiales y que el juez debería haberse recusado.

Reportado por IA Verificado por hechos

El 4 de noviembre de 2025, los votantes en ciudades importantes reelegieron a varios fiscales reformistas, incluidos el fiscal de distrito de Filadelfia, Larry Krasner, y el fiscal de distrito de Manhattan, Alvin Bragg, lo que indica un apoyo urbano continuo a los cambios en la justicia penal incluso después de reveses destacados en otros lugares.

La administración Trump ha despedido a casi 100 jueces de inmigración en el último año, según un recuento de NPR. Esto incluye cambios significativos en la Corte de Inmigración de San Francisco, que cerrará en enero de 2027 por no renovar el arrendamiento. Los casos del tribunal se transferirán a una instalación cercana en Concord.

Reportado por IA Verificado por hechos

En una audiencia del 5 de noviembre en Alexandria, Virginia, un juez magistrado federal criticó a los fiscales en el caso penal contra el exdirector del FBI James Comey y ordenó al Departamento de Justicia que entregue rápidamente materiales de investigación y del gran jurado, mientras las disputas sobre el manejo de pruebas y privilegios se intensificaban.

 

 

 

Este sitio web utiliza cookies

Utilizamos cookies para análisis con el fin de mejorar nuestro sitio. Lee nuestra política de privacidad para más información.
Rechazar