Demanda colectiva contra Sony por los reembolsos de aranceles de la PS5

Se presentó una demanda colectiva contra Sony Interactive Entertainment en un tribunal federal de California, alegando que la empresa obtiene un beneficio financiero indebido de los reembolsos de aranceles. El caso sostiene que los consumidores deberían recibir ese dinero tras haber pagado precios más altos por las consolas PlayStation 5.

La demanda, Walker et al contra Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC, fue presentada el 6 de mayo de 2026 ante el Tribunal de Distrito de los Estados Unidos para el Distrito Norte de California. Acusa a Sony de quedarse con ganancias inesperadas procedentes de reembolsos vinculados a aranceles que la Corte Suprema de los EE. UU. declaró ilegales en abril de 2026. Los demandantes sostienen que Sony aumentó los precios de las consolas para compensar los aranceles y que ahora debería transferir los reembolsos a los compradores en lugar de retener los fondos.

Artículos relacionados

Realistic courtroom scene depicting gamers suing Nintendo over tariff refund profits.
Imagen generada por IA

Gamers file class action lawsuit against Nintendo for tariff refunds

Reportado por IA Imagen generada por IA

Two Nintendo customers have filed a class action lawsuit against the company, seeking refunds for higher prices paid due to now-invalidated tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump. The suit, filed on April 21 in the United States District Court’s Western District of Washington, argues that Nintendo passed tariff costs to consumers while pursuing government refunds. As first reported by Aftermath, the plaintiffs aim to prevent Nintendo from profiting twice from the same payments.

A UK class action lawsuit against Sony over its 30 percent commission fees on digital PlayStation purchases reaches its conclusion this week. The case, valued at $2.6 billion, covers consumers who bought games via PlayStation Network from August 2016 to February 2026. This follows a separate US antitrust settlement that received preliminary approval last month.

Reportado por IA

A class action lawsuit filed in Seattle accuses Amazon of retaining hundreds of millions of dollars from unlawful tariffs instead of refunding customers. The suit follows a Supreme Court ruling against the tariff policy.

A federal judge in San Francisco has ruled that Tesla must face a class-action lawsuit alleging discrimination against American workers in favor of H-1B visa holders. The decision allows claims by software engineer Scott Taub to advance, though the judge expressed skepticism about their ultimate success. Tesla has denied the allegations, calling them preposterous.

Reportado por IA

The US Court of International Trade ruled on Thursday that the 10% temporary tariffs imposed by Donald Trump in February are illegal.

A federal judge in San Francisco has ruled that Tesla must proceed with a class-action lawsuit alleging discrimination in hiring practices favoring H-1B visa holders over U.S. citizens. The decision allows claims by software engineer Scott Taub to advance, though the judge expressed skepticism about the evidence. A second plaintiff's claims were dismissed but can be amended.

Reportado por IA

In a 6-3 decision, the US Supreme Court has struck down President Donald Trump's sweeping global tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, citing lack of congressional authorization. The ruling triggered a relief rally in financial markets, including a brief spike in Bitcoin to $68,000, though gains faded amid ongoing uncertainties. President Trump responded by announcing a new 10% global tariff under Section 122.

 

 

 

Este sitio web utiliza cookies

Utilizamos cookies para análisis con el fin de mejorar nuestro sitio. Lee nuestra política de privacidad para más información.
Rechazar