Mahkamah Agung California mencabut izin praktik pengacara John Eastman

Mahkamah Agung California telah mencabut izin praktik pengacara John Eastman, tokoh kunci dalam upaya mantan Presiden Donald Trump untuk menantang hasil pemilu 2020. Pengadilan menolak permohonan peninjauan kembali baik dari Eastman maupun dari State Bar of California, sehingga menguatkan rekomendasi pengadilan yang lebih rendah. Eastman kini diwajibkan untuk memberi tahu kliennya dan membayar sanksi.

Mahkamah Agung California mengeluarkan perintah singkat pada hari Rabu yang menolak permohonan peninjauan kembali yang diajukan September lalu oleh John Eastman dan State Bar of California. Keputusan ini secara efektif mencabut izin praktik Eastman, seorang mantan profesor di Chapman University School of Law dan arsitek strategi yang tertuang dalam memo yang bertujuan untuk membatalkan kemenangan elektoral Joe Biden pada pemilu 2020. Pengadilan menyatakan: 'Permohonan peninjauan kembali ditolak. Pengadilan memerintahkan agar John Charles Eastman (Responden), State Bar Number 193726, dicabut izin praktiknya dari dunia hukum di California dan nama Responden dihapus dari daftar pengacara.' Pengadilan yang lebih rendah sebelumnya telah merekomendasikan pencabutan izin setelah menemukan pelanggaran etika dalam tindakan Eastman yang terkait dengan pemilu, dengan menerapkan pengawasan ketat terhadap pernyataannya sebagai wujud kebebasan berpendapat politik inti. State Bar sebelumnya mengajukan standar yang berbeda, namun Mahkamah Agung mendukung putusan tingkat bawah tanpa membahas kerugian di luar dampaknya terhadap publik, pengadilan, dan profesi hukum. Eastman kini dihadapkan pada kewajiban untuk memberi tahu klien, rekan pengacara, dan pihak lainnya dalam jangka waktu yang ditentukan, mengembalikan dana retainer yang belum digunakan, dan membayar sanksi sebesar $5.000 ke Client Security Fund milik State Bar, ditambah biaya-biaya lainnya. Pengacara Eastman, Randall A. Miller, menanggapi: 'Mahkamah Agung California telah membiarkan rekomendasi State Bar Court tetap berlaku, yang menurut kami menyimpang dari preseden Mahkamah Agung Amerika Serikat yang sudah lama ada dalam melindungi hak-hak Amandemen Pertama... Kami akan mencari peninjauan kembali di Mahkamah Agung.' Kepala Penasihat Persidangan State Bar, George Cardona, menyambut baik perintah tersebut, dengan menyatakan bahwa hal itu menegaskan bahwa para pengacara harus menjunjung tinggi kejujuran dan aturan hukum, terlepas dari siapa klien mereka.

Artikel Terkait

Illustration depicting Supreme Court striking down Trump's broad tariffs as he signs a new 15% global tariff order amid political drama.
Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

Supreme Court rules against Trump's broad tariffs

Dilaporkan oleh AI Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on Friday that President Trump cannot use the International Economic Emergency Powers Act to impose broad-scale tariffs, prompting immediate responses from the administration and political figures. Trump signed a 15% global tariff under a different law the next day and criticized the court on Monday. The decision has sparked debates over its political implications ahead of the midterms and the State of the Union address.

Ed Martin, serving as U.S. pardon attorney in the Trump administration, has been accused of ethical violations for threatening sanctions against Georgetown University Law Center over its diversity programs. The D.C. Bar's disciplinary counsel also alleges he improperly pressured judges to interfere with an investigation into his conduct. These claims stem from a complaint by a retired California judge.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

Lawyers Defending American Democracy, joined by former White House lawyer Ty Cobb, filed an ethics complaint with the D.C. Bar against DOJ Deputy Assistant Attorney General Drew Ensign. The group accuses Ensign of making false statements to U.S. District Judge James Boasberg during a hearing on Alien Enemies Act deportations. The complaint stems from a mid-March 2025 emergency order that the government allegedly ignored.

A Georgia judge has denied Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis's motion to intervene in a dispute over nearly $17 million in attorneys' fees sought by Donald Trump and co-defendants in a dismissed election interference case. The ruling stems from Willis's prior disqualification for improper conduct under a new state law. The case will proceed to a bench trial without her participation.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

Almost two months after unveiling a proposed rule on March 5 to let the attorney general review ethics complaints against DOJ attorneys before state bar action, the Justice Department faces intensifying debate. With Pam Bondi out as attorney general and Todd Blanche acting in the role, officials cite rising politically motivated filings—citing cases involving Bondi, Ed Martin and Drew Ensign—while critics decry it as undermining state oversight and the McDade-Murtha Amendment.

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon has ordered the Department of Justice not to release former special counsel Jack Smith's final report on the investigation into classified documents taken by Donald Trump. The ruling, issued this week, revives Cannon's earlier stance that Smith's appointment was invalid. Critics argue the decision lacks jurisdiction and contradicts historical precedent for such reports.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on February 20, 2026, in Learning Resources v. Trump that President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) exceeded his authority. Chief Justice John Roberts' majority opinion invoked the major-questions doctrine to limit executive power over taxation, while concurring liberal justices emphasized statutory text and legislative history. The decision, expedited due to ongoing tariff revenue collection, spares some targeted duties but introduces uncertainty amid Trump's vows for alternatives.

 

 

 

Situs web ini menggunakan cookie

Kami menggunakan cookie untuk analisis guna meningkatkan situs kami. Baca kebijakan privasi kami untuk informasi lebih lanjut.
Tolak