Mahkamah Agung membatasi Undang-Undang Hak Pilih dalam kasus Louisiana

Mahkamah Agung mengeluarkan putusan penting pada 29 April yang secara signifikan membatasi jangkauan Bagian 2 dari Undang-Undang Hak Pilih. Keputusan dalam kasus Louisiana v. Callais telah mendorong beberapa negara bagian untuk menggambar ulang peta kongres. Para pembuat undang-undang di negara bagian yang terdampak menyebutkan alasan partisan atas perubahan tersebut.

Putusan ini mengharuskan penggugat di masa depan dalam kasus hak pilih untuk memenuhi standar yang lebih tinggi dengan memisahkan faktor ras dari politik. Pergeseran ini beralih dari kerangka kerja berbasis dampak menuju kerangka kerja yang berfokus pada pembuktian diskriminasi yang disengaja.

Artikel Terkait

Illustration of Supreme Court ruling against Louisiana redistricting map
Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

Supreme Court strikes down Louisiana congressional map, tightening limits on race-conscious redistricting

Dilaporkan oleh AI Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI Fakta terverifikasi

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6–3 on April 29, 2026, in Louisiana v. Callais that Louisiana’s congressional map (SB8) was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, concluding the Voting Rights Act did not require the state to draw an additional majority-Black district. Sen. Raphael Warnock, D-Ga., called the ruling “a massive and devastating blow,” warning it could accelerate redistricting fights across Southern states ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

The US Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision in Callais v. Louisiana, significantly weakening Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act following October 2025 oral arguments. Critics argue the ruling, led by the Republican-appointed majority, invites states to redraw maps entrenching racial disenfranchisement. Republicans expressed satisfaction with the outcome.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

The U.S. Supreme Court last week issued a ruling in Louisiana v. Callais that dismantled key elements of the Voting Rights Act. The decision has prompted swift redistricting efforts in multiple states. Revelations about the lead plaintiff have also surfaced.

In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's April 29, 2026, decision in Louisiana v. Callais declaring the state's congressional map an unconstitutional racial gerrymander (as covered previously in this series), Louisiana has suspended its upcoming primaries for U.S. House races. The ruling affects one of the state's two Democratic-held majority-Black districts. Other primaries, including U.S. Senate, proceed May 16.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry (R) postponed the state's U.S. House primaries until at least mid-July via emergency executive order following the Supreme Court's April 29, 2026, ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, which struck down the congressional map as unconstitutional under the Voting Rights Act. The move, praised by President Trump and Speaker Mike Johnson but challenged by a lawsuit, has caused voter confusion amid ongoing early voting for other races, as Republicans eye redistricting gains.

The Virginia Supreme Court has ruled that a newly drawn congressional map favored by Democrats is unconstitutional, overturning the results of a special election and leaving the state with its previous boundaries.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

The Virginia Supreme Court on Friday struck down a voter-approved redistricting plan that Democrats hoped would add four House seats. The 4-3 ruling cited a procedural error in how the measure reached the ballot. The decision comes amid a broader wave of Republican-led map changes in Southern states.

 

 

 

Situs web ini menggunakan cookie

Kami menggunakan cookie untuk analisis guna meningkatkan situs kami. Baca kebijakan privasi kami untuk informasi lebih lanjut.
Tolak